Now that’s a great response from a local philanthropist

So a constituent reached out asking Matt Paulson if he would be interested in helping to save the Delbridge collection (this is just a portion of his pitch);

Dear Matt Paulson,
You seem to have some very interesting ideas on how to make Sioux Falls a better place to live, work, and entertain people. Your business sense is second to none, and I am reaching out to you to help find a solution to keep, and maintain the Delbridge Taxidermy Assets as a publicly held asset in Sioux Falls. If you read pages 249-265 of the Sioux Falls Shape Place Plan, it discusses some of the same common attitudes as I have proposed to the City Council in recent months. And I am reaching out to you, to get your thoughts, opinion, and ideas. 
I made a sales pitch to the City Council to create a third Business Improvement District, to be modeled after Experience Sioux Falls. I envision it to be called Explore Sioux Falls, which would promote, market, and attract people to the City by way of marketing and selling our Natural Wildlife, Nature, Green Space, History of the Community. By partnering with local businesses, we could add campgrounds, lodging, and other amenities throughout the city that could potentially raise revenues to support such causes of promoting local taxidermy itself. 

While it is rough in details, it does lay out a good plan. Paulson did respond, and NOT what you would expect (or maybe you will);

Good to hear from you. 

I think a BID district to support the Zoo or the Brockhouse collection would be tough because it’s not really an assessment for a specific geographic area to benefit a geographic area (like downtown).

After the mural situation, I decided I am not going to make donations to clean up messes created by the city. The issue with the Brockhouse collection is a self-inflicted wound — a problem the city created and a problem the city will need to solve for itself.

Matt

Messes made by the city? So you are blaming the mural fiasco solely on city hall? Give me a break! You were the sponsor, you could have stood your ground but instead you caved to the pressures of city hall. Sad really.

I also see that the city is full steam ahead on getting rid of the collection, this was in their bid notices this week;

24-0099 – Requests Qualifications and an Expression of Interest (RFQEI) for the Relocation of the Brockhouse Collection Housed at the Delbridge Museum of Natural History.

That collection will be gone before you can blink an eye, and the mayor will get away with it, AGAIN, because our media is busy raiding food trucks and digging thru Noem’s hair salon receipts.

Sanford updates wellness patrons

So Sanford sends out updates to patrons and this was their latest;

The City of Sioux Falls Parks & Recreation department continues to take necessary steps to finalize the purchase of this facility. We understand you may have seen news regarding the pause of the aquatics bond, which originally included the Tea-Ellis purchase agreement. The decision to pause that bond does not impact the sale, and we remain committed to working closely with Parks & Recreation to transition operations from Sanford to City of Sioux Falls no later than Jan. 1, 2025.

Yeah, this deal was inked over a year ago, but nice excuses.

A Word of Advice to the Argus Counsel

GO AFTER THE FRICKIN’ CONFLICT OF INTEREST THE COVER UP AND THE LIES!

Okay, that was my vent. A judge has granted a hearing for the Argus vs. the Scab. I have said that the Argus has a case if they go after the blatant conflict of interest with every single councilor KNOWING in advance of the vote that Matt Paulson was an investor and that he gave to every single person sitting on the dais’ campaigns. The worst part was the council and the Scab hid it from the public. That’s deception on the highest level, not only by council but by the Scab. On top of it, the only blogger covering city politics for 20 years gets told in a nasty text message from one of the owners that him and the other main writers are the only owners . . . until they weren’t.

If the Argus argues this on the original premise of not posting investor info in advance, they will lose the case. Go after the conflicts.

RIP Wave Thingy

I saw the last vestige of these tonight. Drivers have successfully destroyed every single one of you. Before the haters start in, I supported painting the streets, I actually think the painted part should go all the way thru the intersection and should be a bright hazard orange with white stripes and even verbiage that says ‘CAUTION-PEDS’. But putting out devices that cost taxpayers money and destroy vehicles is a very bad idea. Do you think the city engineers learned anything? Doubtful.

That’s some great advertising

So I have rode my bike past this place hundreds of times and it always makes me laugh that an engineering firm didn’t know how to put stones in the ground level and upright. Maybe it’s an artistic touch but me is guessing they just dropped them in the dirt without a concrete anchor. If they were a dentist office or brake shop, wouldn’t think much of it, but you are an engineering firm, this doesn’t bode a lot of confidence in your skills. Don’t let councilor Lucy Bayse know about it, she will write some silly ordinance.