May 2008

Mystery of the altered Sculpture in SculptureWalk

This is the front of the piece called Guardian.

When this piece was originally installed it had cave paintings on the back side of the figure. They looked kind of cool. I assumed it had something to do with southwest Indian culture. Yesterday I was walking my dog and I noticed the cave paintings were gone on the back of the sculpture. After closer inspection I noticed that they had been coverd up with mesh and more resin then painted over. What was strange about it was the job was done rather hastily and the paint didn’t match the orignal color of the sculpture.

What’s up?

I know artists will have a change of heart, and that wouldn’t surprise me, or it may have been vandalized, but one wonders if the artist was asked to cover it up? Seems weird, because there was nothing offensive about the cave drawings. Maybe they were inaccurate and someone pointed it out. I guess we will never know, since the SW committee is good at keeping secrets.

UPDATE:

I talked to someone who works near the sculpture over lunch. He told me that the day the sculpture was installed it DID NOT have the cave paintings on it, then a day or so later they showed up, but were dripping and running when they got wet (so it was done with a magic marker or something similiar that washes away). What he wasn’t sure of is who did it. I assumed that maybe the artist did it, because the drawings looked good enough that it wasn’t the work of a vandal.

Sioux Falls Progress; Citizens FIRST!

UPDATE: I just found out yesterday that if you are considering buying a home in Sioux Falls proper (Central/Downtown) you can apply for a Community Development loan to help pay closing costs. Depending on your credit qualifications this loan can be low interest to interest free in most cases and you only have to pay back 75% if you stay in the house for at least 5 years. Pretty cool.

Photo by Ehrisman, Falls Park Summer 2007

Progress in Sioux Falls can be achieved through economic development directed at citizens. The large development firms in Sioux Falls have squandered the city’s infrastructure budget on new projects and left our current infrastructure maintenance behind and in the red. Don’t be fooled by the lip service some city councilors, the mayor or deep pocketed developers give you. The money is there to maintain our current infrastructure, but there needs to be an overhaul on how we direct that money and projects that will have real economic impact on the citizens of Sioux Falls. I have listed suggestions on how the city can produce revenue, maintain current infrastructure while keeping taxes low in our city.

Double the size of the convention center. The convention center has proven that it has the potential to have an enormous impact on revenue in our city. We should make it larger and reap the benefits from it. Expanding the convention center will have a bigger impact then building a new events center. We will need an events center someday, but if you look at the attendance numbers at our current entertainment facilities it is very obvious that the need is another 7-10 years down the road. The state needs to do a major overhaul of our tax code first before it will be even possible to pay for it anyway, and I don’t see that happening for at least 3-4 years from now.

Eliminate the 1.92% food tax in Sioux Falls. Our city council has the power to do this. It would only apply to grocery items and not to hospitality. I think the largest city in the state should set a moral and ethical example and end this regressive tax.

Build a road through the current location of Minnehaha country club. This project could be a joint effort with federal and state dollars. Once the land is obtained and the country club moves we could use the leftover fare ways for a state campground and hiking trails. Like a Sioux Falls version of New York’s central park. The city and state could obtain fees from campground rental. The new road would also encourage more shopping from people living on the East side of town and ease traffic on 41st and 12th street. 

Promote selling older homes to new families downtown and central Sioux Falls with mortgages that include an automatic community development equity loan for remodeling, rebuilding and landscaping. This will only work if we can convince construction and landscaping companies to focus on rebuilding projects instead of new development through tax incentives, and lower development fees. If we want to rebuild neighborhoods we need to do it with families and individual property owners not pawn shops, casinos and strip malls. This is a no-brainer that the bureaucrats in city hall haven’t figured out yet, or refuse to accept.

Have a central management company to schedule events at the Pavilion Great Hall, Arena, Orpheum etc. and instead of paying a set salary to the company, pay them commission on how well the events are attended and profit. I guarantee you will only get entertainment in Sioux Falls that people actually want to see, and you will produce enough revenue to take risks on entertainment that may be unique to the region.

Hire a full-time commission based realtor to sell off the city’s unused property and obsolete rarely utilized parks.

Relax rules on public art by letting business owners decide on what art or murals can be on the exterior of their businesses. Simplify the rules/ordinances so they don’t have to go through the Visual Arts Commission for approval each time. A variety of visual art would lively up the business sector and make certain parts of the city more appealing. Public art now is controlled by a select group of insiders that wouldn’t know a Rodin if it fell on them.

I know my suggestions are short on details, but worth looking at. Progress in a city can only take place if you involve the citizens and creative thinkers with lawmakers. It seems city hall’s answer to progress is increasing taxes and inflating the city budget. You can actually progress while being fiscally wise. Don’t forget the most important part, it is our money they are spending, we should expect a good return on it.

What you don’t know can’t hurt you

I copied this from SculptureWalk’s sponsor page:

Sponsors

SculptureWalk is a volunteer organization that raises approximately $70,000 in private funds from site sponsorships, memberships, and sales commissions.   All expenses are paid from the private funds.  SculptureWalk is a program of the Sioux Empire Arts Council a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and all contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by law. The City of Sioux Falls contributes $25,000 annually to purchase the People’s Choice Award sculpture and quartzite and concrete pedestals for the sculptures.

http://www.sculpturewalksiouxfalls.com/sponsors/

Most of this information is true, but some information has been conveniently left out.

1) SW has a city representative. I would assume if they are attending SW meetings during their regular work schedule they are on the clock. So that would make SW not entirely volunteer.

2) (I think) The city also contributes liability insurance (which is good) this is how it was originally done because it is cheaper for the city to cover it as a blanket policy then for SW to buy it individually and since the sculptures are placed on city owned property they are liable for any accidents involving the sculptures.

3) SEAC also receives a subsidy from the city, so any contribution from SEAC to SW, has public money intertwined in it. In the SW brochure it mentions grants from The Community Foundation and The SD Arts Council, both organizations that receive public money also.

SculptureWalk’s biggest argument for keeping the public out of the loop on decisions is because of the private funds. But as you can tell, by their own admission, the public gives quite a bit, and should be allowed to participate.

I’ve dubbed this year’s SW, “The Revenge of the Animal Crackers”