August 2008

Let the misleading ensue

Once again the Anti-choicers are spreading BS. Apparently they didn’t learn anything from their lying last year. They claim SD Healthy Families stole Vote Yes’ color scheme. Really? As I recall last year, SD healthy families site was similiar colors to what it is this year, and Vote Yes’ was pink and teal. Who is copying who? Remember when the Alpha Center bought the old PP building by the mall? Or when Leslee Unruh told everyone she had to hire a bodyguard last year (but didn’t tell us it was to protect her from another pro-lifer, who was apparently crazier then her – didn’t think it was possible.) So remember folks, condoms are bad and if you need to get checked for cervical cancer, call a chiropractor.

We don’t need an Event Center . . . yet.

During the CIP hearings I heard a lot of talk and speculation from several departments who say they want to hold off renovations and future plans until they here if an Event Center is going to be built. Enough already.

I compare the idea of a new EC to the idea of an indoor pool. Do the math and you come to the same conclusion that neither is needed.
I voted against an indoor pool, not because I thought the concept was a bad idea, I voted against it because there is already several privately owned indoor pool facilities in SF that you have to pay an admission to just like you would to a municipal one.

Why compete with private industry using my tax dollars?

I see the same with an EC. Our current major subsidized entertainment and event facilities rarely sellout events and are only used about 50% of the year. What does this mean? It means the need is not there.

I think eventually, 10-15 years down the road, we will need a new facility, but not now. Besides, state tax code will have to change before it is even possible to fund it, and I doubt that will happen this year.

I think there is a better idea then building a new EC, especially in SF current economic climate.

First the city needs to contract a promotions and marketing company that’s sole purpose is to book events at our major facilities (Arena, Pavilion, Orpheum), use a central box office and ticketmaster. Pay the contractor a commission depending on the success of the events, not a subsidy. Make them accountable to the taxpayers of SF. I think all of these facilities are capable of generating revenue for the city – if we use them to there capacity. This means allowing a diversity of entertainment.

Second, renovate and retrofit the Arena. This could be done for millions less then building a new EC, and you could accommodate more seating.

Third, double the size of the convention center. The convention center has proven time and time again that it is a huge investment for the city, bringing in millions each year in tax revenue.
Lastly, build a parking ramp in the current parking area by the CC and Arena that is equipped with climate controlled tunnels and elevators to make it more inviting to attend events. The hospitals figured it out, why can’t the city?

Instead of trying to find ways to line the pockets of already wealthy developers, landowners and contractors in this city to build a new EC, why not look out for the taxpayers for once. Is that too much to ask? Hardly, it is our money you are spending.