2008

Two of my favorite South Dakotans

Not sure if you know Jerry and Norma Wilson, but the Argus Leader did a story about their property by Vermillion.

“Since I was a small child, I’ve felt most alive in nature. I’ve spent most of life in rural areas observing, learning, hiking, skiing and lying in the grass and looking around,” Wilson, 63, says.

I met Jerry when he was editor of South Dakota magazine. Him and his wife are regulars at the Touch of Europe in Sioux Falls. Amazing people and great examples of how to live a progressive and honest lifestyle.

Vote No on 10 bologna sandwich

by Stacey Steinhagen

KDLT-TV
Sioux Falls, South Dakota
September 19, 2008

With the election a matter With the election a matter of weeks away, debate is brewing about Initiated Measure 10. The measure would restrict political donations by people with some state contracts, ban government-funded lobbying, and require the government to create a website listing all state contracts.

Supporters say it prohibits taxpayer funded lobbying while others argue it tramples their freedom of speech. A recent 30 second ad, sponsored by the group opposing measure 10, is being challenged by those supporting the measure. KDLT’s Stacy Steinhagen checks the facts.

Miller public school teacher Ellen Iverson is the subject of the ad. In it Iverson calls initiated measure 10 a gag law.

Ellen Iverson says “I won’t be able to visit with our school board members, our legislators. I won’t even be able to visit with my husband about county issues.”

Iverson’s husband is Hand County Commissioner Jim Iverson. Those who have a problem with measure ten say that in her role as a public employee in the Miller School District she cannot lobby, even to her husband.

David Owen, who is the president of the South Dakota Chamber of Commerce, says “Even as an unpaid person exercising her individual rights, she can’t be representing somebody, she can’t be directed by them. I can’t figure out how somebody could have the same agenda as the school board or school administrator or somebody else and not look like they’ve been directed.”

But the group South Dakotans for Open and Clean Government–in vocal support of measure ten—have two problems with the ad. One: it never names Iverson’s husband or the fact that he’s a county commissioner, which is true. And second: the measure’s proponents say language in the measure in no way restricts hers or any government employee’s constitutionally-guaranteed right as a citizen to discuss anything she wants with her school board members, her legislators and, of course, her own husband.

Dena Espenscheid, SE Regional Coordinator for the Yes on 10 Campaign, says, “Unless the school board is paying her to talk to her husband, she’s not breaking the law. But when the school board walks up to her and says here’s some money go talk to your husband, that’s a problem because your tax dollars should never be paying for lobbyists or political campaigns…We’re not saying public employees can’t go out and lobby and campaign. We’re just saying that they need to do it on their own time on with their own money.”

In the attorney general’s description of the initiative, it says if passed the measure will likely be tied up in court since it involves constitutional issues.

In fact, the measure specifically says a public employee acting in an uncompensated personal capacity is exempt.

 

 

 

While Augustana government Professor Brent Lerseth says the initiative is fairly clear he does says one question needs to be addressed for voters about a teacher’s right to speak.Lerseth says, “Does she have to be very careful not to mention she’s a teacher when she’s talking about political issues?”

Lerseth says it will be interesting to see future ads on Initiated Measure 10, and see if voters can get a grasp of it and decide for themselves before the issue is staring them down inside the polls.

 

 


http://www.kdlt.com/news/0919n1.html 

Silliness

I saw this the other day. The entire display is quite a site. I think this person has like 30 McSame signs in the yard. But the centerpiece this a large tire guage that says ‘BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S ENERGY PLAN’. I think if I was a Republican I wouldn’t want this guy supporting me.

SF Developer finally speaks

Now that the vote is over.

As the Argus Leader points out, Mr. Lloyd is developing in the area where some new roads will be built, the same guy who contributed to Jamison’s, Litz’s and Brown’s campaigns this year. Even throwing a fundraiser for Brown at his house.

To the north, on Benson Road, the city plans a $2.8 million arterial from Interstate 29 to Career Avenue. Eventually, it will extend west past Marion Road.Craig Lloyd, who has developed office and commercial buildings on the south side of Benson Road, says there are 3,000 to 4,000 people already employed in the area. Another call center is going in next year, and the two-lane road can’t handle the traffic.

He also believes that growth reduces property taxes. Property taxes NEVER go down, they only rise, and continue to rise in Sioux Falls, one more reason why people are buying houses in Tea, Harrisburg and Baltic instead of Sioux Falls.

Developers and members of the city’s building community spent more than a year putting the package together and getting it through the political process. Lloyd, who marshaled about two-dozen supporters for last week’s council meeting, said it would be a mistake to assume that developers and builders supported the increases out of self-interest.

New roads will open more areas to development, Lloyd said. But that growth helps lower the property tax burden for all residents. Without growth, Lloyd said, the burden will increase for residents.

Then he goes on to say how he deserves to be heard. Yet he never approached the podium even once during Monday night’s meeting. But he got former city planner Steve Metli to go up and vouch for him. 

Lloyd said he’s tired of the implication that he and other supporters of the package were up against “the citizens of Sioux Falls.” “Last time I checked, I’m a citizen,” he said. “I pay taxes. I support the community. Am I a second-rate citizen?”

No, you are not – but we are.