September 2009

Texas schools move away from abstinence-only education: We don’t think it’s working. (H/T – Helga)

stdtexas3e

I wonder if Mrs. Unruh has seen this flowchart?

Texas currently has the third-highest teen birth rate in the country and “the highest rate of repeat teen births.” It also leads the nation in the amount of government money it spends on abstinence-only education. But some school districts in the state are now shifting away from that approach, admitting that it isn’t working:

“We mainly did it because of our pregnancy rate,” said Whitney Self, lead teacher for health and physical education at the Hays Consolidated Independent School District. “We don’t think abstinence-only is working.” […]

Both approaches to sex education teach that refraining from sexual activity is the safest choice for teens.

But abstinence-only gives limited information about contraceptives and condoms and tends to downplay their effectiveness, while abstinence-plus stresses the importance of using such protection if teens are sexually active.

Medical experts have stated concluded that not only do abstinence-only programs not curb teen pregnancy, but “there is evidence to suggest that some of these programs are even harmful and have negative consequences by not providing adequate information for those teens who do become sexually active.”

Will the drinking age get changed to 19? I guess we will know more tomorrow.

10-reasons-to-drink-beer-3

I can think of a few good reasons to change the drinking age to 19.

I have heard underlying inklings that this will be some major legislation next session;

He (Tim Rounds) says he plans to discuss the idea Tuesday when the Legislature’s interim Alcoholic Beverage Control and Licensing Committee meets in Pierre.

I have a feeling this meeting is taking place to get a feel for what the committee thinks of the idea. Hopefully there will be some news on this tomorrow.

$150 Million for a new Events Center? Yeah right.

We have heard this song and dance before;

The parking fee is among emerging details as promoters seek support for a
$150 million entertainment and sports complex next to the Arena and Convention Center.

Remember the $18 million dollar renovation of the Washington Pavilion that has costed taxpayers $40 million to date and we are still not done with the building (this is construction costs NOT subsidies). Or the $1.5 million for Phillips to the Falls that ended up costing twice that (after the mayor broke city ordinance to approve the 100% increase in spending). Not sure where this number is coming from, but I can guarantee $150 million won’t build us a 12,000 seat facility.

Here are my cost estimates (based on the South DaCola Sioux Falls entertaintment facility calculator, where you basically take everything your told by politicians and take that times two)

• New EC: $180 million

• Arena upgrades: $10 million

• Convention Center upgrades and expansion: $20 million

• New Howard Wood (which taxpayers will have to foot the bill for one way or another): $26 million (this was a number Darin Daby was throwing around)

• Destruction of HW and Parking: $15 million

TOTAL COST OF PROJECT: $251 MILLION

I will be curious how the Task Force spins these numbers. There was one positive part to the column though;

It also depends on City Council endorsement this fall, permission from the Legislature to raise the city sales tax, then voter approval in November 2010 and two years for construction.

I don’t think it will make it to voter approval, but I was glad to here that is still a part of the plan. We all know our rubber stamp council will approve it, any opportunity to raise our taxes they are front and center.