2009

We don’t want no stinking pack rats, long grass or crazy branches in our city

A flow chart accompanying the audit revealed the complexity, prompting City Council member Vernon Brown to say it “would be funny” if it weren’t a report on “the inefficiency of city government.”

The code enforcement officers in Sioux Falls are busy. Gee I wonder why?

The city’s process for enforcing codes and collecting unpaid fines is “tedious and consumes a large amount of staff time,” an internal city audit has found.

At the end of last summer, more than $160,000 remained outstanding in fines, including more than $85,000 in fines from citations that were more than a year old.

City codes forbid many things, including overgrown weeds, junk cars, RVs parked in driveways and untrimmed trees. Although the city has a dedicated code enforcement officer, employees in several departments inspect properties for violations.

I think the last sentence says it all. They should only issue violations on a complaint basis. Period. Too many cooks spoil the stew.

Then Mike Cooper has a little hissy-fit;

He criticized the audit for “exceeding the scope” of its intended purpose and for crossing “into matters of administrative affairs unrelated to financial practices.”

See, Mr. Cooper doesn’t like ‘AUDITS’ or people investigating how he does his job. Why? Because as you can see, he ain’t real efficient at it.

Oksol (auditor) suggested the council empanel a citizens’ review committee to assess the “adequacy and appropriateness” of code ordinances and review the balance between “community standards and property rights.”

Damn Right! The problem is that there are too many violations being handed over to people who have certain rights on their property, the city has started acting like a police state. I think it is silly for the city of Sioux Falls to be handing out violations for too long of tree branches on trees they own in the blvd. Wouldn’t it be more cost effective to just have a truck come by and trim the damn trees themselves? What do we pay taxes for anyway?

Have 20 of our state senators completely lost their frickin’ minds?

Apparently So. They continue to try to get this Amendment on the ballot. I hope the House has enough sense to vote this down and kill it in it’s tracks.

Sen. Scott Heidepriem, D-Sioux Falls, says the state might scare off the Iowa developers by giving the governor and Legislature power to respond to such border threats.

Listen, I understand your revenue concerns, but they are silly. One wonders if you are just doing this to protect video lottery owners. The facts are simple. If a large Casino opens in Larchwood it will supply many quality jobs to residents of Sioux Falls, high-paying, good benefits jobs. These people will live and spend their paychecks in Sioux Falls. Also, people who travel to the Casino from other parts of Iowa, South Dakota and Minnesota will most likely come shopping in Sioux Falls. I think the casino in Iowa would actually boost the economy in Sioux Falls. The losers? Video Lottery casinos on the Eastside of Sioux Falls. Who cares. Boo-Hoo!

Senator Knudson is the only one who got it right;

Sen. Dave Knudson, R-Sioux Falls, said the proposed amendment doesn’t limit the types of gambling the governor and lawmakers could create.

“In the end, this will have the effect of locating one mega-casino in Sioux Falls,” Knudson said. He said it likely would also result in development of huge casinos for the state’s reservations.

Of course, now if he can just get a backbone, this might have not passed the Senate.

Wouldn’t this be fun to attend?

A Sioux Falls man is challenging the city’s HOME RULE charter in a hearing on Friday.

Judge Caldwell will hear arguments on February 13, 2009 – 9 AM.

It should be in courtroom 6 on th 6th floor (not sure yet).

Witnesses in order will be Gary Colwill (former city atty who installed 1994 Home Rule, 9AM)

Kathryn Rockwell (Tornow’s paralegal who signs everything for him, 11AM)

Brad Hartmann (city code enforcement officer, all afternoon)

Shawn Tornow is city’s defense council

 

Hopefully the MSM will be covering it . . .