And the winner is . . .
l3wis 
This site outta make wingnuts heads explode. I like his montage of mission accomplished photos.
2009
What a sad, pathetic little man . . .
Good Riddance!
He calls it making ‘tough decisions’ while the rest of us call it ‘bad decisions.‘
Leaving office with the highest disapproval rating since Richard Nixon, Bush said, “You may not agree with some of the tough decisions I have made, but I hope you can agree that I was willing to make the tough decisions.â€
And than there was his great success in keeping our economy strong . . .
Bush’s presidency began with the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil and ends with the worst economic collapse in three generations.
“Facing the prospect of a financial collapse, we took decisive measures to safeguard our economy,†he said. “
You mean like pretty much letting the SEC do nothing?
“Like all who have held this office before me, I have experienced setbacks,†Bush said. “And there are things I would do differently if given the chance.
Like concede the election in 2000? I’ll call Michael J. Fox and see if we can fire up the DeLorean.
What a ******* *******! Tuesday can’t come soon enough.
Blanchard; Close, but no cigar
After the World Trade Center fell, Bush decided that stopping the next attack was not a matter of law enforcement, but a matter of war. It was imperative to find out what the terrorists were planning, and make them stop. I think he was right to do so. His most vociferous critics accused him of trampling of civil liberties, but I wonder how much those liberties would have been worth to most Americans if 9/11 had been followed by a series of terrible attacks. Americans have not yet been scared. The World Trade Center was in New York. We don’t want to see what happens when we get really scared. If you want to protect civil liberties, and I certainly do, you have to stop the really big scare from happening.
First off, I will address the 4th Amendment, and Bush’s ass-wiping session with it. I think most Americans don’t have a problem with the surveillance of ‘possible’ terrorists, I sure don’t. Afterall, it is his job to protect us. I think all we are asking is that he follows the 4th amendment and allow some oversight. Obviously national security prevents private citizens from knowing everything, but Shrub could have have asked people in the Judicial or Legislative branch for a little insight in what he was doing. It’s called building trust. He could have done that without violating the Fourth and risking national security. This is where people get suspicious – like when the NIA is building secret rooms in private phone company buildings . . .
As for keeping us safe, I beg to differ. He was warned about 9/11 and did nothing. He knew WMD’s were not in Iraq and sent over 4,000 American troops to their deaths anyway. If that is your idea of ‘keeping us safe’Â I have some ocean front property I would like to sell you in Tea, SD.
Need a party to crash?
Ironic Johnny’s R & R birthday bash seems like a good place to start! I wonder if the president’s ear will be there? Better tell Munson so he come and kiss his ass.
South DaCola art club with me!
Debbie Harry Bouquet #3 (Blondie)
8″ x 8″ – Mixed media collage & Acrylics on wood
Custom wood frame – FOR SALE $50