11 Thoughts on “City of SF to appeal all counts to the SD Supreme Court of the Daily case

  1. Costner on August 4, 2010 at 9:49 am said:

    You can’t even teach stupid on these levels. What is the purpose of this – don’t they even care about due process rights?

    I’m very disappointed.

  2. l3wis on August 4, 2010 at 9:57 am said:

    I suspect it is a stall tactic until they can fix the appeals process.

  3. l3wis on August 4, 2010 at 9:57 am said:

    I guess it tells me one thing, never hire a lawyer from the CADWELL firm if you are in a constitutional jam.

  4. Is this the Sanford that is helping the county sell the fair grounds?

  5. Oh yeah.

  6. Ghost of Dude on August 4, 2010 at 12:22 pm said:

    Sounds like it’s time for a citizen letter-writing campaign to tell them to quit with this lunacy and just fix their damned problem already.

  7. He’s also the guy leading the Minnehaha Country Club negotiations with the City I believe.

  8. Plaintiff Guy on August 4, 2010 at 1:14 pm said:

    What if an answer with counter lowers the city’s bond rating and insurance grade?

    City civil procedures are void until there’s a decision and neither party appeals into federal court. Citizens are protected from their government for 3 to 5 years.

  9. l3wis on August 4, 2010 at 7:40 pm said:

    Sanford was also one of Huether’s ‘advisors’ when looking for a city attorney.

  10. l3wis on August 5, 2010 at 2:25 am said:

    As I suspected, it is a stall tactic;

    http://www.argusleader.com/article/20100805/NEWS/8050301

    ‘City Attorney David Pfeifle said the notice of appeal doesn’t necessarily mean the case will be argued before the state’s highest court, however.

    The notice had to be filed to meet the 30-day window for appeals to the Supreme Court, but the city still is determining what its next move is. Mayor Mike Huether’s administration needs time to review the effect of the decision, Pfeifle said, and the city still could choose to alter its appeals process to bring it in line with Caldwell’s ruling.

    “There are a lot of options on the table, but we had to preserve our right to appeal,” Pfeifle said.’

  11. Plaintiff Guy on August 5, 2010 at 6:56 am said:

    (Hands around an imaginary dictators globe)

    We can get Home Rule Charter tyranny revoked. We can Sioux Falls. You don’t need the ‘Millionaire’ book, just one state court case with major constitutional violations.

Post Navigation