2010

Blogs are not impartial? Get out of here!

Like Mayor Huether, Gargoyle Leader Publisher Randell Beck just can’t stop beating a dead horse about the blogs on the internets (yes Randell I can read between the lines, too bad Dan Scott and Bill Janklow cannot). In his column this week he tells us why newspapers should be able to endorse politicians (instead of actually keeping an eye on them) And in an effort to drive his point home he had to take a swipe at the blogs, again;

The need for credible and meaningful information about government and our public officials, especially on the local front, is greater than it’s ever been. To prove the point, I suggest you list the sources of impartial news you used to learn about candidates in the recent city elections or this week’s state primary – and campaign commercials and ads don’t count.

See what I mean?

Oh, I know what a few of you are thinking – and a guy I respect a lot agrees with you.

Blogs are not impartial newsmakers, and we know it and unlike yourself, most of us make little to nothing to be public advocates. Just list the blogs in this state, and none of them claim or even act like they are impartial – that’s why we blog, we have our causes! Even the one about gardening has a liberal slant. It is your job as a ‘real’ news organization to be impartial, it is that whole ‘fourth estate’ thingy, and when you endorse a candidate (like blogs do) you are no different then we are, not impartial. I could go on a rant about being a for-profit newspaper makes the endorsement process a gigantic conflict of interest or that the 1st Amendment protects free speech (including bloggers) to say anything about a political candidate as long as it is not libelous and is opinion oriented. But I am sure you have heard it all before. Why not just take the advice of your big boss, who I could not agree with more;

“Enlightened newspaper editors and owners have come to understand that when they endorse a political candidate, their news coverage becomes suspect in the eyes of readers, even though most reporters are basically fair and accurate,” Neuharth wrote.

He is right – and it could not be any clearer with the Gargoyle Leader. I have often complained to the few reporters I can trust at your newspaper that the editorial board has a clear agenda for this city and state and it is no where inline with what the real citizens want or even need. You often endorse candidates who match your agenda, and that is unfortunate. Like I mentioned above, the job of a local newspaper is to inform and be the watchful eye of government (The fourth estate) not to agree or disagree with a certain politician or political agenda. Too often you let your ‘personal’ beliefs spill over on the pages of your newspaper and they really show in your endorsements.

I hate to break it to you Randell, but blogs are not going away, so you better just get used to them and go back to what you are good at, being impartial, let us present the endorsements.

Republican Governor Primary Forum

Like I said in my last post, I don’t have a dog in this fight. I watched the Stormland TV forum, here’s some things I took away from it;

LYON COUNTY CASINO

“We have known about this for awhile, so there should have been some proactive leadership.” Munsterman

SMOKING BAN

“It is a public safety and health issue . . . I support the ban for citizens.” Knudson

MEDICAL MARIJUANA – They all said they would vote ‘NO’ and not support the measure

3RD PENNY SALES TAX INCREASE

Knuppe, Knudson and Munsterman support the tax increase (Knudson even goes farther and feeds that same bullshit line the Events Center tax force fed us; “We are increasing the taxes – it will be up to the voters.”)

Doogard and Howie DO NOT support the tax increase.

“I’m not surprised you would support a tax increase, Dave.” Howie’s response to Knudson

FUNDING GOVERNMENT

Munsterman & Howie agree on finding new revenue sources (energy) to reduce taxes and bringing in more revenue for funding state government.

EDUCATION FUNDING

Doogard and Howie threw Knudson’s education funding idea (increase education funding at the same rate as revenue) overboard. Doogard pointed out the obvious;

“Over the past few years education would have seen no increase.”

CLOSING STATEMENTS

“Ken, don’t trust anyone in a fancy suit.” Knuppe quoting his grandfather

Who do I think won? Well, I didn’t see any real winners in the forum. I felt Doogard and Howie had a strong showing, but if I was an undecided voter, I would vote for Munsterman. He had fresh ideas that were much different then the other candidates.

The Rapid City Journal’s endorsement of Knudson is no surprise

UPDATE: The Gargoyle Leader follows suit

Will the Gargoyle Leader follow suit?

Senate Majority Leader Dave Knudson led the long overdue movement to cut state spending this legislative session and knows that more cuts will be necessary to tackle the projected deficits which lie ahead. While the state’s Republican legislative and executive leaders have all been guilty of overspending and underestimating the impact of the nation’s recession, at least Knudson tried – albeit a little late in the session – to rein in spending in Pierre.

Knudson’s approach is in contrast to the governor and lieutenant governor, who support dipping into the reserves and not addressing the fundamental issue which so many Americans are demanding this year: Reduce government spending.

Knudson is looking for ways to increase funding for our K-12 education system, and would like to retool the current formula to allow state school districts to receive additional revenues when the state prospers.

Knudson became an advocate for open government and open records in 2009 – following in a path carved out by former attorney general Larry Long and Sen. Nancy Turbak Berry. Knudson helped get SB 147 passed which presumes state’s records to be open, no small feat in a state which is desperately far behind when it comes to supporting a public’s right to know.

Knudson believes our infrastructure needs improvement, and has the courage to outline how he would pay for it. A gas tax increase and license plate fee increase may not be popular, but credit him for his honesty and for giving specific funding sources for his initiatives.

I don’t have a dog in this fight, and have said all along, Doogard probably has this all wrapped up. But it is clear Dave Knudson is the most qualified candidate in the race, and maybe with endorsements from both the RCJ and the AL, he may be able to sneak by Doogard. I know a battle between Dave and Scott would be fun to watch. One being an ex-Dem and the other an ex-Rep, not to mention all the legislation they have worked on together, it could be a finger pointing death match to the end, or a chummy-chummy hugfest of barforific proportions.

Here we go again with that transparency thingy

We hear it every election season from politicians, “Transparency, Transparency, Transparency!” Then we get this;

The city of Sioux Falls has rejected a request from the Argus Leader to make public an audit report critical of Sioux Falls Convention Center management. Lead Auditor Rich Oksol denied the open records request Tuesday, arguing that the audit is a draft. “When it’s still in the draft stage, it’s still up for the discussion between the person being audited and the audit committee,” Oksol said.

Here’s the deal, if you don’t want to be transparent, then don’t tell us you will be in your campaigns. Most people probably don’t care two shits about the audit (or the fact that the convention center continues to make less money each year while asking to expand). Of course, the councilors (and mayor) throw it in the lap of a city employee;

“Although no precedential case has been found that would decide this issue exactly on point, it appears more likely than not that this draft report is not a public record,” stated Assistant City Attorney Gail Eiesland in a written opinion.

Then she goes on to pass the buck back to the public officials;

Reached Tuesday, Eiesland said the audit committee could decide to make the audit public.

“They have the option to release the record or not,” she said.

Isn’t this how code enforcement turned into such an unconstitutional fucking mess? I’m just saying.

“I think our goal has been to be out in the open as much as we can. In the end, all we are trying to do is to shine light on the practices of different departments and making sure the public’s money is being spent and handled appropriately,” Jamison said.

If your goal is to be open, then release the document and stop shagging the monkey. IMO they are trying to ‘tweak’ the numbers before the public sees the report.