2010

City Sales tax increase to go to a committee vote on Thursday

Advocates, We learned something since yesterday, namely that HB1198 (to allow more sales tax for new city projects) comes up on Thursday. So contacts are needed to the committee members who will vote on Thursday. Urge them to oppose this bill.

The news of the hearing comes from the Sioux Falls Chamber of Commerce, a big supporter of HB1198. They want 1% more sales tax for an event center. (Other cities might want to raise sales tax for their new projects.) They put out legi contact info (copied below) to their members.

Please urge Rep’s to OPPOSE HB1198, because it would be problematic for the cost of living to go up, which would happen if cities raise sales tax. I personally think it would be morally wrong to charge the poor and middle class for large portions of the cost of a place of entertainment.

HB1198 says the tax hike would be temporary. But it does not prevent a city from thinking of one project after another.
It requires a local vote for the project and accompanying tax hike. But we know low- and middle-income people would not be able to mount the kind of advertising campaign that project enthusiasts could. And low-and middle-income people have a harder time getting information except from advertising and getting to the polls.
It says cities could have a refund program, if they choose. We know about refund programs! No matter how generous and simple, refund programs miss people, often lots of them. If the idea is that basic necessities should not be taxed, then let’s not tax them in the first place.
Cities do not often admit it, but there are other ways to raise funds. In the case of the event center, the city could be asking for a higher allowable bed-board-booze tax (BBB). If not such a hurry to pay off the building (3-4 years), they could build an event center mostly with 2% more on BBB, supplemented with some private fundraising (donations, naming rights, ticket fees, luxury suite fees, etc).

Here is nifty Legi Contact info (from the Sioux Falls Chamber):
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
On Thursday, Feb. 11, the House Local Government Committee will take up the Local Option Sales and Use Tax increase - HB 1198. Here is your chance to be part of the process. We have included a list of those who are on the committee. It is usually most effective to contact your local representative or senator; however, if you personally know others on the committee your contact to them can be very powerful.

Here is a listing of all those who are on this particular committee (just click on their names to send them an email):
Mark Kirkeby (Chair, represents Pennington County)
Val Rausch (Vice Chair, represents Brookings, Deuel, Grant and Moody counties)

**Sioux Falls area legislators**:
•  Jim Bolin lives in Canton and represents Lincoln and Union counties. His phone number is 987-2630.
•  Blake Curd lives in Sioux Falls and represents Lincoln and Minnehaha counties. His phone number is 321-0121 while in Pierre and 339-8918 in Sioux Falls.
•  Dan Lederman lives in Dakota Dunes and represents Lincoln and Union counties. His phone number is 712-251-1992.
•  Darrell Solberg lives in Sioux Falls and represents Lincoln and Minnehaha counties. His phone number is 361-2475.
•  Martha Vanderlinde lives in Sioux Falls and represents Minnehaha County. Her phone number is 201-7427.

Other legislators on the committee include (we’ve linked their names to their email addresses):
•  Justin Cronin lives in Gettysburg and represents seven area counties.
•  Dennis Feickert represents Brown and McPherson counties
•  Justin Frerichs represents Day, Marshall and Roberts counties
•  Betty Olson represents Butte, Corson, Harding, Meade and Perkins counties
•  Fred Romkema represents Lawrence County
•  Tim Rounds represents Hughes, Stanley and Sully counties

City attorney Tornow uncooperative? Get outta here.

City Attorney Shawn Tornow has more important things to do then assist the citizenry that pays his wages

Trust me, I have heard the horror stories about attorney Tornow from citizens and city employees alike. I hope the next mayor has the brains to give this guy his walking papers. I find it hard to believe that City Clerk Owen is the one being uncooperative in this matter;

After Tornow and Owen disagreed on whether ballot measures should contain the editing marks indicating how existing law was being changed, and whether the proposal to let the City Council set initiative filing deadlines was written too broadly to be constitutional, a frustrated commissioner Pamela Miller told them “it seems a lot of discussion between your offices goes on right here. I guess I’d appreciate a little more communication between your offices.”

Tornow has gotten quite a reputation for sweeping things under the rug, just ask Dan Daily how times his court case got postponed because Tornow had some lame excuse. I have a feeling that Owen probably tried to get Tornow’s cooperation, but like most requests from the attorney’s office you never hear anything back.

And with no surprise by me, he favors less transparent government;

Owen and former state Rep. Mary Glenski told commissioners that elected officials routinely see the marks in draft ordinances and they would be helpful to voters, too.

But Tornow countered that the marks would be confusing.

“The council is used to dealing with that. Joe Citizen is not,” he said.

Yeah, God forbid they see what the current law is before voting to change it.

Go away Shawn.

Awesome Photos!

It was 12 below zero in Pierre on January 9, 2010. I glanced over to see Capitol Lake as exceptionally beautiful this day. so I couldn’t resist stopping to “play photographer.” In those few minutes, my fingers became numb. I had stopped to have a little fun, but stood in silence before leaving with a deeper respect for our great American soldiers. Images by Colette Kessler.

ATT00046

ATT00052

ATT00055

Pakistani ambassador given the shaft by Saudis

Apparently, the name of the new Pakistani ambassador has rubbed the Saudis the wrong way. The ambassador’s name, Akbar Zeb, in arabic means “Biggest Dick”.  Similar attempts to penetrate the diplomatic corps of the UAE and Bahrain were also cockblocked.

While the Pakistanis had a huge swell of confidence that their man would be able to erect new bridges with their middle-eastern friends, it turns out that a major case of penis envy has given diplomacy the blue balls, and the Pakistani government a throbbing headache.

I, for one, am proud to live in a country where men whose name is also a euphamism for the male genitalia can be elected to high office and serve as members of our diplomatic corps anywhere in the world. All they need is a stiff adherence to our American principles and the peoples’ mushroom stamp of approval.

Last I checked, politicians have the same 1st Amendment rights as I do

Image; Pat Powers, Dakota War College

I have stayed pretty quiet on this issue over the last couple of days (because the legislation would be impossible to enforce and quite frankly, it is unconstitutional), but I think it’s time I said something. I have often told politicians that I use sarcasm on my blog to ‘make observations’ in an attempt that someone can produce the facts, hopefully the party I am skewering. I will give any politician an opportunity to set the record straight, libel and slander isn’t a good thing, and if I wronged you, prove it. But that defense usually never happens. Why? Maybe because it is true? Maybe because they think they are above me? Maybe they don’t know how to work their email? Who knows, who cares. When someone tries to slander me, I defend myself. What I can’t understand is why politicians don’t do the same? The Gargoyle Leader tried to paint me as the ‘anti-pavilion’ a few years back because I opposed some policies of the Arts Center and I went after them tooth and nail. That is what I don’t understand? If you are a politician and you think someone is spreading lies about you on the internet, why not use your First Amendment rights to defend yourself, instead of writing pitiful legislation that only helps lawyers make money. I’m not even going to go into detail about the author of this legislation, all I am going to say is that I am very disappointed in him, but not surprised. He has done silly stuff like this in the past. But what can I say, lawyers truly are ‘birds of a feather.’

I often wonder if Benjamin Franklin (my American hero) would have gotten discouraged or worried about slandering the King? Would the Revolution ever have happened? Challenging and dissenting government takes balls. It can also be messy and mean. I thank God everyday that I live in a country that put the most important amendment first – free speech. Now STFU SD Legislators and go work on something more important, LIKE HOW YOU ARE GOING TO BALANCE THE BUDGET.