Ask Dan Daily;

The city lost my driveway issue in circuit court and didn’t appeal it into state Supreme Court.

The case of Daily versus the city became a constitutional argument questioning all city civil procedures. I won my driveway, so new code enforcement policy does not concern me. However, defendants must not be denied access to the courts for any civil procedure.

If city ordinance 2-66 still resembles “subject to judicial review” instead of “either party can appeal into circuit court,” they have not complied with the state court ruling.

I advise every citizen who contests a city decision to carry the argument straight into court. It doesn’t matter what the city process is, you’ll lose and need the court anyway.

Kinda sounds like nothing has really changed when it comes to code enforcement. No DUE PROCESS FOR YOU!

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2lfZg-apSA[/youtube]

 

By l3wis

2 thoughts on “So did the city really fix due process when it comes to code enforcement?”
  1. The city is not known for honesty, integrity, & justice. Never accept the mediator theyre paying. He’s a down on his luck alcoholic lawyer they prop up with lines they give him to say. Some day they’ll find out their way is more expense. Probably not because then they’d have real jobs in the private sector where common sense prevails.

Comments are closed.