2011

Important changes to the way the city handles contracts

I could try to explain this in a very long blog post. But I will let you read this document yourself, AND watch the petulant city directors piss and moan about the changes. Basically it comes down to the city council having more control of the city awarding contracts, which city directors fear will slow the process. While this may be true, I support the changes because it will bring in greater oversight for the council and transparency to the public. What the council may or may not realize is that they are creating more work for themselves, but hey, that is why we elected them. Maybe they can pass a city ordinance that allows them to be paid $75 dollars every time they have to debate a city contract.

While education funding is in the crapper, Debbie Hoffman bellies up to the trough

“Maybe I can invoice the SF School District for the time it takes me to eat my free lunch?”

This of course doesn’t surprise me;

SIOUX FALLS, SD – How much would someone have to pay you to do a TV interview?

KELOLAND News doesn’t offer compensation for interviews, but South Dakota school districts do offer compensation for board members who are interviewed, or doing anything on behalf of the district outside of official meetings.  It turns out an interview KELOLAND News did with a former board member this spring cost taxpayers $75.

On March 21, then-school board member Debbie Hoffman came to the KELOLAND studios for an interview about a policy to allow for teacher searches on school grounds.

A month later, on April 25, Hoffman submitted her time to the school board and was approved for compensation. Turns out, it’s perfectly legal.

“State law allows school board members to turn in for up to $75 a day for school board meetings or events or meetings related to school board business,” current School Board President Kent Alberty said.

When Hoffman sat on the last EC task force, she never showed up for a meeting until the end when they needed to start making decisions, and she acted like she had all the answers. While education is extremely underfunded, and school kids in SF get FREE and reduced lunches, Debbie thinks she should be paid for a 5 minute interview. I hope she takes that $75 check, rolls it up really tight and shoves it straight up her  . . .

20th Anniversary of Nevermind

Man, I am fucking old. This album came out the summer I graduated from HS. I was a ‘Grunge Punker’ and wore flannel, All-Stars and shitty white t-shirts. Nirvana turned me onto some great bands like the Melvins, Screaming Trees, Smashing Pumpkins (when they were good).

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYxkezUr8MQ[/youtube]

The Jazz Fusion group THE BAD PLUS does the best cover (Fuck Tori Amos, or as one of my Ex’s called her Hairy Anus. Rocco wrote a concert review about her in his college paper and called her a dried up turd. One of the advisors didn’t think kindly of it, and he got in a bit of trouble, I’m off topic now, sorry)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZ6Xo1mYSJg[/youtube]

If a new road is essential for growth, jobs and development – why the secrecy?

If you don’t give us taxpayer money, we are packing our bags (where have we heard that one before?)

The public becomes suspect when in one breath government tells us we must subsidize private industry for our benefit then turns around in another breath tells us that industry must remain secret;

They won’t name the employer but think they can secure state and federal money to help pay for a new roadway to accelerate improvements in the area.

“It’s a major organization we want to keep in Sioux Falls,” said Darrin Smith, city director of community development.

————————–

“The company wants to keep its identity confidential, and we’ll honor that,” Barr said. “There’s no commitment on their part or our part, but anytime a company opens the door to relocate, you want to make sure you have a competitive option for them.”

If they are asking for public money, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever that they remain confidential. If you want our money, fine, fess up. Secondly, I find it very hard to believe this company would be packing bags if we don’t build this road for them. I do think this road is needed in that part of town, but to make it sound like we are going to lose jobs and businesses if we don’t build this road is a stretch.

I have no idea who this business is, but if I had to guess, here is a pretty good clue;

Much discussion now is about another city business that has outgrown its location and might be looking at the park for a new plant.

I’m guessing it is the metal recycling plant that wanted to move in the old stockyards, and the city has been jumping through hoops for them so they WON’T locate in that location. If anybody else has the facts and wants to confirm that, please comment.

 

The SF River Greenway project is getting environmental funds?

Look at all the waste we are cleaning up with these cool steps

I guess building bike trails and amphitheaters qualifies as ‘environmental’ projects;

7/15/11 • The City of Sioux Falls announces that the Downtown River Greenway Project will receive funding made available through the Big Sioux River Environmental Trust Fund.

The order authorizing the full expenditure of the fund was signed by U.S. District Court Judge Lawrence Piersol after receiving the necessary approvals from the counties of Minnehaha and Lincoln in South Dakota and Lyon County in Iowa. The fund, established in 1996, was created in a settlement with John Morrell & Co. for environmental infractions and is estimated at approximately $1.9 million.

The funding will help pay for improvements downtown along the Greenway between Sixth Street and Tenth Street. The improvements are designed to provide greater public use and access to the river while also providing water quality improvements and reducing pollution in the Big Sioux River.

From a reader;

Phase I is much more than just blocks and concrete for yet another amphitheater. 5.1 million was allocated for Phase I of the project (between 6th and 8th street) 3.3 million of that was supposed to go towards items that are ENVIRONMENTALLY related. I fail to see how tons and tons of concrete between 6th and 8th street is environmentally related.

And I find the settlement money even more troubling. The city says the 1.9 million in this trust fund is going to be used for improvements from 6th to 10th street. Huh? As I recall, the taxpayer funded 5.1 million was supposed to be for improvements from 6th to 8th street. Another 3 million, of which this 1.9 million is part of, was originally intended for Phase II from 8th street to 10th street.

About that 1.9 million dollars. That is money from a settlement with John Morrell for polluting the Sioux River back in the ’90’s. It is called “The Big Sioux River ENVIRONMENTAL Trust Fund.” It was established in 1996 by court order. The money was to be used primarily for these 3 reasons.

1. Reduce pollution along the Big Sioux River.

2. Identify continuing sources of pollution along the Big Sioux River.

3. Develop and implement strategies to reduce and/or eliminate pollution along the Big Sioux River.

How does a heavy concentration of concrete along a small stretch of DT meet these ends?

The intent of the use of that 1.9 mill was clearly laid out in the 1996 settlement. It is called The Big Sioux River Environmental Trust Fund for a reason. I stated the top three reasons above. Using that money to build concrete and block barriers for stages every 200 feet, or two pedestrian walkways within 100 feet of the 8th street crossing does not meet the environmental smell test IMHO.

IMHO bringing the 1.9 mill into play now BEFORE the 6th to 8th street phase is even close to completion says one thing. A while back finding bedrock for phase I added a mere 1.4 mill to the cost. Just another cost overrun. Something this city knows real well. Is this “environmental” trust money being used to finish phase I, or will it be used to turn 8th to 10th street into a concrete jungle? GREENWAY project? Yeah….right.

No surprise the city is running out of money on this project and there is cost overuns, it is typical of how the city operates. That is why a $120 million dollar cost estimate on the EC is a complete joke.