2011

Ellis’ weekly column touches on my post about campaign promises

Poor Mike, no matter how hard he tries, he can’t bury the past. Just like a Shakespeare play;

Then out pops an ad from the Huether camp. There’s a picture of a smiling My Man Mike, and he’s promising to save taxpayers $100 million by building an events center that costs $100 million.

How do you save $100 million by spending $100 million? Next to Huether’s picture is a picture of Brown and Costello, looking like ghouls who eat puppies. Below that is a summary of the plan they endorsed, albeit with some exaggeration. The ad says Brown and Costello supported a plan that would cost $202 million and increase sales taxes.

At the time, Huether said he would build the facility using private investment, the existing entertainment tax and user fees.

The irony in all this is actually Vernon Brown, while the mayor has HAD to change his mind based on polls and studies and by already securing the office of mayor, Brown is notorious for flip-flopping like a fish out of water. Maybe that is why he got 3rd place in the mayoral election, TWICE.

But back to campaign promises. There was only one candidate running for mayor that would have given us exactly what he promised. And since he told the truth, he was not selected. What a sad state of affairs we are in now. As I told some commenters the other day, you made the Mike Huether bed, now you can sleep in it.

 

Here we go again, another rate increase

While the economy, inflation and employee pay stays stagnant, another utility wants more, more more;

Xcel Energy is asking for a 9.3 percent hike in electric rates for its 84,000 customers in Sioux Falls and surrounding areas of southeast South Dakota.

The company said Thursday that the increase would add about $7 to the monthly bill of a typical residential customer and raise $14.6 million in revenue.

Xcel said the money is needed to improve infrastructure, comply with new regulatory requirements, and respond to changes in the economy.

The request for a rate increase will be decided by the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission.

Respond to changes in the economy? If so, shouldn’t you be reducing rates instead of raising them?

 

Imagine that, the Feds put a stop to stupid anti-choice laws

This doesn’t surprise me one bit;

“Nothing in the text of the statute permits physicians to use their medical judgment to avoid disclosing information that is untrue, misleading or irrelevant,” she (U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier) wrote.

Oh, but this truly becomes ridiculous;

In arguments over the law on Monday, lawyers for Attorney General Marty Jackley argued that legislators simply intended for Planned Parenthood to provide a checklist for mental health risk factors.

Checklist? This isn’t Jiffy Lube. This is a place that provides many low income & younger single women health services (besides abortion). I think Planned Parenthood knows what they are doing. Nothing to see here, please move along.

BREAKING: City finally held accountable for sewer backups in 2004

You will notice that even though the city was insured for these kind of problems, they still had to be taken to court to get the money. Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

For immediate release:

SEWER SYSTEM CLASS ACTION AGAINST CITY OF

SIOUX FALLS SETTLED BY THE PARTIES

The law firms of JOHNSON HEIDEPRIEM & ABDALLAH LLP and HUGHES LAW OFFICE are pleased to announce a settlement in Arneson v. City of Sioux Falls, Civ. No. 05-1713.

In 2007, the Circuit Court in Minnehaha County certified a class action comprised of property owners in Sioux Falls who suffered damage to their homes and businesses in 2004 as the result of the City’s inadequate storm sewer system. Following a notification procedure, 159 class member residents who suffered such damages completed the necessary forms to request inclusion in the class, executed affidavits, and provided documentation detailing their damages suffered in these devastating events.

Attorneys Steve Johnson, John Hughes, Pamela Bollweg, Ron Parsons and Jonathan Krueger have been working with a group of committed class representatives since that time to try to hold the City accountable.

These representatives are pleased to announce that an agreement has been reached with the City and its insurers to settle the certified claims brought against the City.

The settlement creates a fund of $1.95 million dollars that will provide partial reimbursement to the 159 class members that executed inclusion affidavits during the notification process on a pro rata basis.

“In 2004, a group of committed citizens came to me following this disaster,” said Attorney John Hughes. “They wanted accountability and they wanted justice. This settlement represents the fruits of all of their effort and hard work.” These claims are covered by the City’s insurance policies purchased for this type of event and no taxpayer dollars are involved in the settlement.

The settlement, which must be approved by the Court, will be overseen by a consulting firm that specializes in class administration. Should the court approve the final settlement, class members that have previously executed affidavits should expect to receive partial compensation some time this fall.

“This settlement represents a fair compromise, given the complexities involved in the case,” said Attorney Steve Johnson.

“We are pleased that these innocent property owners will finally receive reimbursement for the damages they incurred.”

Pesky campaign promises

I found this statement about Events Center funding ‘interesting’

Turbak said Monday the city soon will finish paying off other bonds, which would free up revenue to pay off the bonds for an events center. That means other programs and projects won’t be sacrificed for the events center.

You mean like transferring the Lewis & Clark bond over to water rates and out of 2nd penny CIP revenue? Oh and those pesky campaign promises. Notice during the campaign he promised

• Not to add on to Convention Center

• Pay for it with Entertainment taxes, user fees, private donors and parking and rental fees. No mention of bonding (click on image to expand).