Advocates,
Here are some bills that would have an effect on low-income children and families in South Dakota. We know that money is tight in these homes, especially with rising food prices and utility bills. I am taking the liberty of suggesting whether to support or not, but you can assess them given the low-income people you know.
On taxes:
SUPPORT
HB 1154 would help by shifting tax from food to non-food. The state’s portion of the food tax would drop from 4% to 0%, while non-food would compensate going from 4% to 4.35%. The many low-income people we have interviewed about this plan have thought it a good idea that would help them. Even people with food stamps like the idea, because they are hoping to get off food stamps, and their neighbors are paying tax on their food.
HB 1154 would help by shifting tax from food to non-food. The state’s portion of the food tax would drop from 4% to 0%, while non-food would compensate going from 4% to 4.35%. The many low-income people we have interviewed about this plan have thought it a good idea that would help them. Even people with food stamps like the idea, because they are hoping to get off food stamps, and their neighbors are paying tax on their food.
Special focus: House Taxation Committee – Rep’s Duvall, Erickson, Feinstein, Greenfield, Hunhoff(Bernie), Kirschman, Latterell, Miller, Novstrup(David), Peterson, Rasmussen, Rozum, Russell, Solum, Wick
OPPOSE
HB 1193 would raise the state’s portion of sales tax from 4% to 5%. It states no particular purpose. Sales tax is a regressive tax. We should raise it only for a very good purpose that allows the low-income households to come out ahead.
HB 1193 would raise the state’s portion of sales tax from 4% to 5%. It states no particular purpose. Sales tax is a regressive tax. We should raise it only for a very good purpose that allows the low-income households to come out ahead.
Special focus: House Taxation Committee – Rep’s Duvall, Erickson, Feinstein, Greenfield, Hunhoff(Bernie), Kirschman, Latterell, Miller, Novstrup(David), Peterson, Rasmussen, Rozum, Russell, Solum, Wick
OPPOSE, unless amended
SB 172Â would raise the sales tax in June, July and August for “support of the state government”. Â Unfortunately they did not exempt food or utilities. Summer is when families have the most expense for food for their faat-growing, physically active school-age children. Â We can suggest that this bill be amended so that when this tax goes up for those summer months, at the same time, it could be dropped one percent or more on food.
SB 172Â would raise the sales tax in June, July and August for “support of the state government”. Â Unfortunately they did not exempt food or utilities. Summer is when families have the most expense for food for their faat-growing, physically active school-age children. Â We can suggest that this bill be amended so that when this tax goes up for those summer months, at the same time, it could be dropped one percent or more on food.
Special focus: Senate Appropriations Committee – Senators Adelstein, Heineman (Phyllis), Jones, Novstrup (Al), Peters, Sutton, Tidemann, Van Gerpen, White
On healthcare:
SUPPORT
SB 140Â would allow more low-income pregnant women to get medical coverage. It would allow enough funds to raise the income for eligibility a little higher. The payoff can be huge when pregnancy care prevents even one life-long disability and its expenses.
Special focus: Senate Appropriations Committee – Senators Adelstein, Heineman(Phyllis), Jones, Novstrup(Al), Peters, Sutton, Tidemann, Van Gerpen, White
SUPPORT
The Medicaid option in the Affordable Care Act. This would help 48,000 low-income adults get medical coverage. Most of them will not be eligible for the newly affordable policies that will be offered next year. Some of these adults are parents of children who have Medicaid. It is really important for children to have healthy parents. Adults with no children need coverage too. Some have health problems that could be solved making them more able to function in society. (On this topic, my hunch is that philosophy is more the issue than money. Most of the funds would be federal.)
Special focus: We would like to convince all legislators and the governor of the value of this.
On criminal justice reforms
SUPPORT helpful provisions in SB 70 that would allow out-of-penitentiary placement for crimes like drugs and alcohol, which can be monitored in home communities. This would mean more parents could be in the home with their children and also able to go to their jobs to support their families. Families could be less destitute and children more attended to.
I hope this is a helpful start at looking at some of this year’s bills and suggesting topics for the weekend public or private sessions with legislators. Other bills may yet show up as impacting low-income children and families especially. Don’t wait too long to make your contacts. The session goes fast. Thanks for being the voices people need.
Bread for the World members,
You and your friends are invited to First Lutheran Church next Sunday, Feb. 3, for the presentations by our Bread for the World staffer Tammy Walhof. (You don’t need to be a Lutheran to come, even to come to the worship service there.)
If you have been to her presentations before, you know how interesting they are. We are so blessed to be in her region.
Time:  adult education hours, 9:30am and 11:00 am, your choice.
Place: First Lutheran-Sioux Falls, 327 S. Dakota Ave, Friendship Room. When you come in the main doors off the parking lot, take a left and go downstairs. (I am sure there would be a wheelchair accessible way to get there too – just ask.)
Topic: “A place at the table: Ending hunger in God’s worldâ€
Tremendous progress has been made in dramatically reducing hunger and poverty around the world. Churches play an important role in “serving our neighbor.â€Â Yet in our country, both poverty and hunger are on the rise. What’s been accomplished, and what still needs to be done? Bread for the World Senior Organizer Tammy Walhof answers those questions and more.
Food:Â Also there on Sunday, you can eat at the Belgian Waffle Breakfast, 9am-1pm, $6 ahead or $6.50 at the door. Children under 5 eat free.
I hope some BFW folks can come. Then come to Pierre with us for Bread Days if you can. Once again, here is the info about that:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/88418838/Bread%20Days%202013%20half-pg%20flier.pdf
“faat-growing, physically active school-age children”
Yea those ‘faat’ growing kids…. perhaps we need higher taxes on junk food?
Seriously though I might support elimination of food taxes if there were categories that were still taxed. I don’t think I should have to pay more sales tax for clothing and soap just so someone can save a few cents on their 12 pack of Pepsi or their meal at the Olive Garden.
So I feel we need a differentiation between nutrition (which can be exempt from taxation) and empty calories / junk food (which should continue to be taxed) as well as prepared food (which should also continue to be taxed).
The problem with this is it requires yet another government agency to determine what is taxed vs. what isn’t, and that costs money and is incredibly inefficient. Same holds true when you say food isn’t taxed at all because now you have people interpreting what is food vs. what isn’t. Is chewing gum food? Does pet food count? How about alcohol?
Next you need to think about logistics. It is probably easy for Hy-Vee or Walmart to code their POS system to know what items are taxed at what rate, but think of the small town grocery store that still has price tags on every item. Now it is up to the cashier to know if something is food or not since they sell everything from ground beef to rat poison in one store.
Sure seems a lot easier to just tax everything and call it a day which is probably why we do it that way. If anything just add sales taxes to advertising and services that are currently exempt, and that should allow the sales tax rate to drop, which in turn benefits all.
I think one of the proposals on the table is to eliminate the tax on ‘unprepared’ food, like bread, milk, flour, etc. And it can be easily barcoded. I can’t imagine that even small town grocers are still using a non computerized system.
Just feed the local homeless. The city has no programs. The county tries but their partition from taxes is low and unfair. Huether buys fountains for the rich peoples hotel but watches the homeless die in the streets. If they panhandle, he arrests and tortures them until they agree to leave town. No wonder he’s not a christian.
To live in Sioux Falls, you must be rich and arian. An occassional arm high, forward, and with an open hand salute to Huether might get you some attention but be sure it’s with cameras rolling or you’ll be beaten.
Dan – you might be the first person on the planet who has an obituary that reads “He died from an overdose of cynicism”.
Why don’t you just move out of Sioux Falls already so you don’t have to continually feel the city is after you. Clearly you will never be happy here.
I tend to agree with Craig on that. I saw a couple available houses in Bryant last week. I’m sure they’d be happy to have a new citizen/taxpayer.
Craig, he isn’t in town much as it is. Be easy on him, he is working on something pretty beneficial to the citizens of SF. He may be a little erratic, but there is a method to his madness, trust me 🙂