UPDATE: Lawsuit filed against the City of SF?

by

Stormo VS. City of SF

It looks like there was a Board of Appeals hearing in October (DOC: Stormo-hearing )

Then a court hearing in November (DOC: Stormo-vs-city )

I’m no lawyer, but by the looks of the hearing in November, it was preliminary. Correct me if I am wrong, but it looks like that hearing had to do with what the court will allow him to sue for.

Posted in: Sioux Falls

6 Thoughts on “UPDATE: Lawsuit filed against the City of SF?”

  1. Boring on August 13, 2013 at 11:24 am said:

    Well that was quite a let down after all that “I can’t talk about it” baloney.

    Reminded me of when Donald Trump said he had big breaking news and then it turned out he would offer 5 million for Obama’s college transcripts.

    Wake me up when you find a real scandal.

  2. l3wis on August 13, 2013 at 11:36 am said:

    I guess I didn’t say it was ‘scandalous’. But I did find it ‘interesting’ that actual people are being named in the lawsuit. There hasn’t been any reports in the news about it either, I also find that interesting, especially when two mayors and the Chief of Police are being named in the lawsuit. The final case still has to go to trial, and I have tried to get a copy of the brief, but I am afraid we won’t be able to see that until it goes to trial.

  3. Testor15 on August 13, 2013 at 11:47 am said:

    Does anyone know what started all of this?

  4. Perry Mason on August 13, 2013 at 12:07 pm said:

    Don’t forget he also named John Doe. When it comes to frivolous lawsuits it’s better to flock shoot – you name a bunch of important names and hope one sticks.

  5. Detroit Lewis on August 13, 2013 at 10:06 pm said:

    Is that what Mattlock does, Mason?

  6. Testor15 on August 14, 2013 at 7:08 am said:

    It is called a conspiracy suit. You name unknown other participants as John Doe to leave the door open for more charges.

Post Navigation