December 2013

Keep your fire hydrants clear of snow

!cid_09B3BB1D-A072-4273-A628-D1A85ED1DD40@midco

A friend recently sent me the above picture. Apparently some people in his neighborhood think it is okay to bury the fire hydrant. Not only does it endanger their own property, it endangers other people on the block.

It’s not like Sioux Falls has not tried to get people to clear their hydrants much less get people to NOT bury them. What is the financial, criminal or civil penalty for this stupidity other than death or loss of property? While I am not big on turning your neighbor in for code violations, if you do see someone burying the fire hydrant, please report the incident to the SFFD or talk to your neighbor about it.

Here are several stories about consequences;

City of Sioux Falls Code Enforcement – Snow Removal – Fire Hydrant

Buried Fire Hydrants Can Be ‘Life and Death’ Situation

Clearing Snow From Fire Hydrants

Garage Fire Carries Reminder to Clear Hydrants

Fire Rescue asks you to keep hydrants clear

Take a gamble, build a house in a new SF development

rollingreddice

I don’t agree entirely with this letter writer, but they make some good points;

The city of Sioux Falls has sent a clear message to potential homebuyers. The planning commission and city council have made it clear that you had better not buy or build a house in a newly developing area unless you are a “gambler.”

It seems that when a developer goes into planning and zoning to change things, the city planning staff goes to work for the developer to help get it done. Planning commission members call the developer by their first name and assure us all that the developer has met all the requirements set out by staff and ordinances.

I have seen attitudes on both the planning commission and City Council that were condescending toward the citizens of Sioux Falls who had done their due diligence and thought they had built in a single-family neighborhood. Now we know that building in these new developments is a gamble. The message from our city government is to build or buy in an established neighborhood or roll the dice. Shame on our city leaders.

I do know that not all developers in Sioux Falls are treated equally. Some don’t even bother building in Sioux Falls because of the multitude of zoning ordinances. I also think that developers do have property rights, and to some extent can build just about any thing they want to within limits and respect of their neighbors. The homeowners must also understand that when you build in a newer part of town, and their is an empty lot next to you. Things may change. But in the case with RMB, this had already happened, and the homeowners had already agreed to zoning changes just a few years ago. But with the change in the economy it seems instead taking a hit (like a lot of homeowners did during the recession) RMB felt they needed the rules changed due to their poor investment. In this case, the neighborhood was handed a raw deal because of the out of options property owner. This is neither fair nor right. The sad part is that this should not have even made it to the Planning Commission or City Council. The Planning department should have looked at the petition had the city attorney deny it. This is actually done quite frequently. The zoning change had already been made, RMB should have stuck to it.

Looks like the only winner here is the house (City Hall).

What is going to happen to the Arena now?

SiouxFallsArena_SD_49250_4Z

It seems almost like the city doesn’t really have a plan for the Arena? Does it?

Sioux Falls Arena General Manager Terry Torkildson said “you’ll see a drop off. It’s not going to be maintained at the level it has over the past few years, with the number of events we’ve done because we’ll move the majority over to the new events center but it will still be a very active building and a very important part of the complex.”

With sports teams like the Stampede moving on to the newer building next door, Torkildson hopes to fill these seats for other events.

“There’s always smaller, unique things that you can do in here, anything from a place for teenagers to go on the weekend, we can bring in local bands, and fill the place up that way, there’s just lots of options out there and we’re exploring all of them,” Torkildson said.

City leaders believe keeping the arena up and running allows for more events.

Sioux Falls Project Manager Kendra Siemonsma said “it offers this tremendous opportunity to bring in conventions, acts and events that will utilize all three spaces, but it also gives us the power to have more available dates.  In the entertainment industry, if you talk to SMG (management), it’s important to have available dates.”

And one of Torkildson’s fondest memories at the arena is bringing in the Summit League Tournament.

“When we pulled that one off, and showed what we can do, I think last year there were over 40,000 people through the building during that tournament, is really one of the crowning achievements,” Torkildson said.

“There’s lots of memories here but we’re going to create bigger and better ones in the new building,” Torkildson added.

Torkildson tells us the Shrine Circus will stay at the Arena. They’ll welcome the Home Show  in 2015.  And he’s also in talks with bringing in the derby team the Roller Dolls, as well as a few acts to be announced.

This concerns me for a number of reasons;

1) I have often felt the better option would have been to refurbish the Arena instead of building a new EC and expanding the meeting rooms at the Convention Center.

2) Was there any true discussion about the future of the Arena before we went full steam ahead of selling the public the new EC?

3) There are renovation plans for the Arena after the EC is completed (I believe $9 million is budgeted) but what are those plans? And will the public be given specifics?

4) We could hardly fill the Arena to capacity before we started building the new EC, what will they do with the building now?

5) I find it a little hard to swallow that the space will be used for a lot of conventions when you have a shiny new building a few hundred yards away.

6) Why didn’t anyone propose making the Arena into the new iceplex instead of building a whole new facility, or a public rec center?

7) Is the new EC being built not because the Arena wasn’t sufficient but because some people wanted to make a little quick money (bond sales/contractors).

8) What kind of operating costs will the taxpayers have to endure to keep the doors of the Arena open, especially while we are trying to make the new EC profitable and paying down those bonds?

9) Doesn’t the city/SMG have an obligation to have a viable plan for the Arena after the EC opens? Don’t they at least owe us that much?

We got sold a brand new entertainment center without having some key puzzle pieces in place. Parking. Adequate lodging and dining in the area. And no real future plan for the Arena except a teen hangout, a circus and ‘some’ conventions. Hey, but we closed the EC deal, so that’s all that matters. Right?

Pressler’s Press Conference

larryp

Pressler jumped right into it. Blaming Republicans and Democrats in Washington for the stalemate. He called the political system ‘poisonous’ several times during the press conference. He concluded the parties are a conduit for money in Washington. Pressler said that is why he will only serve one term so he won’t waste time raising money for next term, but working for citizens.

As for running as an independent, he pointed to Senator Byrd as a successful Indy senator.

Larry says military spending in the mideast wars is ‘outrageous’ and thinks some army bases overseas should close to modernize the military to save money. He added that he hates endless wars because they don’t yield results.

One of his agendas is more international trade with agriculture in SD.

He described himself as a libertarian several times that is opposed to NSA spying on citizens and thinks it violates our rights and freedoms.

He said he initially supported Obama because he thought Obama would fix the patriot act, but was disappointed he has done nothing, also disappointed that Obama hasn’t done much to end our foreign wars. He also criticized Senator McCain several times for wanting to expand our wars into Syria and Africa.

While he thought the ACA was important legislation, he would have voted against it and thinks it needs an overhaul like cost containment and interstate insurance commerce.

He also believes Obama should concentrate on lowering the deficit.

He touched on supporting women’s and minority rights such as equal pay.

He contests that indies are not spoilers and doesn’t want to be treated as such. He thinks the race could easily be won by 35-40% of the vote and that raising money will be difficult. He joked, “It takes a lot of money to tell people you don’t have money.” He confesses that nobody watches debates so you have to compete with marketing your bid.

WHAT I THOUGHT

I think it was the first time I met Pressler in person. Before the press conference, we introduced each other and I was very surprised by two things, how good he looks physically and how approachable he is. His wife is also very approachable. After a friend told Harriet (his wife) about my blog, she had some kurt words to say about another ‘Republican’ blog.

My first impression is that Pressler is serious about this run, and very cool, calm and collected about it. I feel that this can easily be a three man horse race, especially since Rick and him have a lot of ideas in common and can easily gang up on Rounds. He also sets himself away from his opponents because 1) he has served successfully 5 terms in Washington (Rick is a two time loser) and Rounds is an establishment man.

Do I think Larry has a chance? Too early to tell. After the Republican primary we will have a clearer picture of how this will go. The EB-5 investigation could topple Rounds, which would put a very conservative Rhoden or Nelson in the candidacy. I think this will be one of the most exciting and interesting senate races in the history of the state if Pressler stays in the race until the end.

Merry Beermas!

santa-drinking-beer-bud

Had to laugh about the letter to the editor yesterday about the lady complaining that the Argus featured a photo of a beer drinking black bearded Santa, because she thought Santa should be seen as a role model to children (and should only have a white beard).

I guess no one told her that Santa doesn’t ‘really’ exist and any portrayal of this fictional character is game. Besides, doesn’t she know the true meaning of Christmas and what she should be teaching children about the holiday? Consumerism.