Join the Argus Leader’s Patrick Lalley and blogger/city hall watcher Scott Ehrisman as they discuss the ballot initiatives and the candidates on the ballot, as well as the latest on the pro-outdoor group that is challenging wording on the ballot. They will also compare endorsements from the Argus Leader editorial board to Ehrisman’s picks.
http://www.argusleader.com/story/news/politics/2014/03/26/100eyes/6913975/
l3wis
Someone asked me who I’d vote for. My answer was whomever is running against Huether.
This is the first time my vote has not been for candidates but against incumbents and anything city hall is pushing for.
I don’t need election information when it’s obvious everything’s wrong with local government.
“They will also compare endorsements from the Argus Leader editorial board to Ehrisman’s picks.”
Sorry I missed the show, but if memory serves the only race you agree on would be one of the city councilors right? (Speaking of the initiatives and races only)
Did you and Lalley make a friendly wager for a amber colored beverage to the one with the closest results?
1. City made a mistake on the ballot
2. Save Spellerberg alerted city to the error.
3. City refused to make any effort to correct misinformation
4. Save Spellerberg Group tried to ensure voters are provided correct information
Voters should have the proper ballot language. The integrity of the vote is at stake!
Judge said today Spellerburg language ok. However, challenge the city whenever you can legally. It’s harrassment they deserve for not being citizen friendly.
You can watch the replay on the main website.
I think it is fantastic that Pat let me have the final word on the election before the election. I was so giddy.