Interesting the letter is dated June 6, then he spoke before the county commission on June 10 about still trying to resolve this.

Postmarked June 11.

and he didn’t even bother to sign the letter

millage-book

Click on image to enlarge

By l3wis

6 thoughts on “So is it Gant or Litz that messed up? Makes you wonder?”
  1. The ‘tricks’ of the trade. It seems there’s always something new to sway the vote favoring incumbents or promoting something citizens don’t want.

  2. Gant lives in Sioux Falls and Pat Miller campaigns all the time. Few of the County Auditors like the current SOS office. I think Democrats are missing a big opportunity to run for that seat.

    I don’t really care who’s fault it is the problem is that they don’t work together to resolve it which tells me it is both of their faults and they either need to fix it or get rid of the current administrations.

  3. When a dignitary or should I say dingbat can’t even sign his name it’s not a legal document he doesn’t want
    to be accountable to screw up his job with future employer mmm

  4. You’d think Millage would be able to call in a few favors over at his former employer KELO to make this a story, but I guess not.

  5. Did you know Litz proposed an audit of the voter list (data)? Just a way to deflect from the source of the problems with recent elections — internal control and processes. The data audit may not be a bad idea, but it won’t fix the problem by itself. How about an audit of the auditor’s office by an independent party? Not by a CPA, but someone who specializes in controls. (Just happen to know someone.)

Comments are closed.