2 thoughts on “Sioux Falls City Council Agenda, Item #8”
Huh? Isn’t this a double negative like most city ordinances? Legal result is say something then defeat it with the next statement that argues and cancel it.
The city attorney needs a new job writing the tiny text at the bottom of advertising. Nobody can read it and it’s (generally) unenforceable.
can you believe laws with the words should, may, can, I bet our EC has those words in the contract to take care of the siding fiasco. Wait til MMM has to tell all how he screwed that up, just like the walmart at 85th and Minn. Can you imagine Walmart paying 12.00 a sq ft and the cost of street infrastucture on 85 and the audie to the south. Then to find out they can go a mile to the west and get land for under $3 sq ft and be able to have an interstate and west roof tops to support them. Gees MMM, WTF Oh golden boy Jeffy Schmidt whats thay you say. Word play oh yeah
Huh? Isn’t this a double negative like most city ordinances? Legal result is say something then defeat it with the next statement that argues and cancel it.
The city attorney needs a new job writing the tiny text at the bottom of advertising. Nobody can read it and it’s (generally) unenforceable.
can you believe laws with the words should, may, can, I bet our EC has those words in the contract to take care of the siding fiasco. Wait til MMM has to tell all how he screwed that up, just like the walmart at 85th and Minn. Can you imagine Walmart paying 12.00 a sq ft and the cost of street infrastucture on 85 and the audie to the south. Then to find out they can go a mile to the west and get land for under $3 sq ft and be able to have an interstate and west roof tops to support them. Gees MMM, WTF Oh golden boy Jeffy Schmidt whats thay you say. Word play oh yeah