South DaCola

Are the same recycling requirements enforced on Commercial vs. Residential?

A few months ago I spoke to the SF City Council about my concern that NOT all (a majority) of restaurants are NOT recycling (besides cardboard and cooking oils).

Jessica Lantgen, Sustainability Coordinator for the city spoke about the topic of recycling enforcement yesterday at the Public Services Committee meeting.

Below is the separate set of ordinances for recycling requirements;

Commercial Recycling

57.028 states that commercial and business establishments, governmental facilities, entertainment facilities and schools must separate from the waste stream materials banned from landfill per 57.050 and the recyclables must be removed at a minimum of twice per month

oThe City of Sioux Falls regulates the licensed waste haulers’ recycling rates. The waste hauling community is the connection between the City and individual residents and businesses

 

Residential Recycling

 

 

I find it interesting that residential have specific requirements for materials but commercial does not. And this may be why enforcement is not as strict on commercial properties?

What I also find even more interesting is that if these ordinances are in place, why are they NOT being enforced on commercial properties?

Lantgen talked about trying to increase that enforcement and has a goal of higher recycling rates, and that is wonderful! But my question is why hasn’t it been done up until this point? I think I have been recycling as a resident in Sioux Falls since the late 90’s.

Once again, the rules may or may not be the same for residents and businesses, but it also seems residents have to follow stricter rules then the commercial properties.

The supposed ramped up enforcement on commercial properties will be intriguing to watch.

Exit mobile version