The Sioux Falls City Council agendas have been posted on Fridays since the dawn of time, and posting those agendas hasn’t slowed government down one bit. It has, however, given the public the opportunity to review the agenda over a longer period of time, and let’s be honest, that’s what the council and administration are worried about;

The Council is also proposing swapping the agenda posting days from Friday to Monday to make it easier for contracts to make the deadline by Monday.

Danielson, however, said he believes it is an effort by the council to put the public in the dark.

“They are doing everything possible to circumvent the group of activists out here that are trying to preserve our rights,” said Danielson.

Karsky said they are meeting the state’s 24-hour agenda requirement and that the public shouldn’t be worried about under the table proposals.

“We’re just trying to make our government run more efficiently. What are we slipping in? It’s posted. We’re doing what the state says we have to do and we’re just trying to make government run more efficiently,” Karsky said.

I asked a Minnehaha County official yesterday why they choose to post their agenda on a Friday before their Tuesday meeting (since they only have to follow the State’s 24 hour rule also). They told me that it would be hard to meet the 24 hour deadline since they would have to have the agenda posted by 9 AM Monday, and would just be easier to get it done on close of business day on Friday. In fact they told me that previous county administrator McFarland just preferred to have it up when he left on Friday so it could be up over the weekend for people’s review and wouldn’t have to scramble to get it completed on Monday. Imagine that, customer service and actual efficiency in government.

Some others have expressed to me that maybe the new city clerk (with no clerking experience, and will be making the same salary on day one as the current clerk makes when she retires, around $87K) may need the extra time to get the agenda together, even though his two assistant clerks have been doing this for years.

This is no more then an opportunity to close the public review time down, councilor Karsky’s smirky face says it all in the above interview.

GARDENS IN THE BOULEVARD

The council will also be taking public input once again on the boulevard gardens, in that mysterious time somewhere between 4:15 and 6:45 PM. Just hang out, you will get your opportunity eventually.

It is predicted that the administration will be bringing their recommendations to the table at the meeting, which may or may not include condemning all homes that are adjacent to 36.5″ Day Lillies in the boulevard, even though the Fire or Police department have NOT been able to give us concrete evidence that tall flowers have caused mass casualties and killed more toddlers then Polio.

3 Thoughts on “Shorter Posting times makes government more efficient? Not for the public.

  1. My Mistake Mike on January 19, 2016 at 8:22 pm said:

    Karsky is wrong as usual. “We’re doing what the state says we HAVE to do” couldn’t be farther from the truth. State law sets the MINIMUM at 24 hours notice. They are perfectly within the law to leave things alone.

    In Karsky’s defense, though, his statement sounds like it came straight from the city attorney’s mouth – and we know his track record when it comes to open government.

  2. teatime on January 19, 2016 at 8:27 pm said:

    So, what is so “efficient” about waiting until the last possible minute to meet the 24-hour posting requirement? If someone is submitting a contract, efficiency would require that they get it in BEFORE a Monday deadline and get it in on Friday.

  3. The D@ily Spin on January 20, 2016 at 9:20 am said:

    What’s become apparent is everything they do is sneaky and counter to public preference.

    Karsky, you’ll never become mayor or sell me insurance. Get used to it. The reason for bringing in the high profile city clerk is he’s to become the next mayor via absent RV voters and hidden poll places. Perhaps the city attorney could add some double talk so we’re not sure who we’re voting for.

    Doesn’t matter about city code regarding vegetation height or (for that matter) anything. Per case history, courts do not recognize their legal procedure.
    I repeat myself but:
    – Never pay a citation. It’s an admission of guilt.
    – Ask for 3 citations. It’s city policy but double jeopardy. If the original citation wasn’t enforced, another citation cancels the matter.
    – They’ll take you to small claims court. Insist your case be heard in circuit court because your defense expense exceeds small claims scale.
    – They’ll not sue in circuit court because case a dismissed citing their charter is due process unconstitutional.
    – Without the court, they have no way to impose a fine or impose a lien.

    They’re a small dog with lots of bark but no bite. Kick them aside but be polite about it in case they someday comply with constitutional law.

Post Navigation