June 2016

Why are we here?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QvYqDSZmG_I[/youtube]

We have to ask, what is so wrong with neighbors showing up to a Sioux Falls City Council meeting? Why does the Leadership seem to get all flustered?

Our example presented here is democracy and the right to air citizen grievances gone amok. We elect people to hire competent staff to keep things straight. Look what happens when the weight of keeping a story straight begins to make the house of cards fall apart.

Remember this June 21, 2016 City Council meeting, a shaky stack of cards is getting ready to fall. We don’t know when but it is interesting how our city government is rattling and shaking.

We ask questions and expect answers, what’s wrong when we get a different answer to the same questions? Why are the answers to our question always, “You didn’t ask it in the right context” or something like “You should have asked it (fill in the blank) way.”

Remember the immortal words of Dolly Parton “It costs a lot to look this cheap” and consider. We have a city government of image and very little substance.

HUGE FAIL! $27 million Federal tax dollars and rail traffic in Downtown Sioux Falls will remain almost the same

railyard winter 15

The cold hard truth about the RR relocation project

Yesterday at the informational meeting there was an update on the RR relocation project. And while the switching yard will move outside of town (that is why we are getting ten acres of land) it was confirmed by planning staff that rail traffic will remain ‘almost’ the same.

I guess when the environmental study was done, BNSF explained that while the longer trains will not be switching cars for smaller deliveries downtown anymore with Eastern and Ellis, that those deliveries will still have to be made Downtown. Planning described it as ‘Smaller trains, but more frequent traffic’.

I went to the city council meeting last night, and during public input I expressed my disappointment in how this project has really changed from its original intent, which was to close the switching yard downtown AND reduce rail traffic. In fact, it could get worse with more frequent train traffic.

Not sure where the train went off the tracks with this project (no pun intended) but it seems the feet dragging and delay after Huether took office may have affected the final result. It was no secret that Huether was cock blocking the project so talk of an Events Center downtown could be quelled. The ten acres would have made a perfect spot for a parking lot for a downtown EC. In fact many still burning from the sting of that whole fiasco have argued that is all that property is good for, besides a public park. As I expressed last night, you won’t be able to build residential, and retail may be questionable also. Besides the noise of the more frequent trains running along the development land, the close proximity to the river could flood the Southern edge of the development. There has been talk about making the area a ‘quiet zone’ which requires crossbars on the street, but as I have understood Federal law on that, there will still have to be some kind of (audio) warning system in place. And even if the whistles are NOT blowing the rattle and clank of trains is loud enough.

Of course all of my whining really is coming to late. Our media really failed pointing out the reality of this project, the only journalist willing to say anything in agreement with me is Johnathan Ellis, and he gets chided for it.

This project is a HUGE FAIL for Federal Tax payers, a HUGE FAIL for downtown commuters and soon it will become a HUGE FAIL for local tax payers once we will be all standing around holding the bag for a piece of property we paid $27 million for that at most, probably will sell for around $4-5 million, AFTER we clean it up.

This is prime example of how pathetic government can really be with our money.

 

Lacey Estate Planning Commission Meeting, June 1, 2016

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ou3k6cmxXtQ[/youtube]

The Sioux Falls Planning Commission met on June 1, 2016 to discussion rezoning the Lacey Estate property on North Bahnson and East 6th Street.

This century old farmstead has been in the Lacey – Brown family as the last holdout to agriculture in east Sioux Falls. The Lloyd Companies have big plans which do not sit well with the neighbors.

We’ll have more on this in the future but for now sit back and enjoy our Sioux Falls Planning department personnel make a fine confusion out of a plan.

T Denny throws John Paulson a Hail Mary before the municipal election

hail

Now that most of the financial reports are up for the council candidates, I can do a review of them. Nothing really glaring in the reports except that recently appointed planning commission member John Paulson received one last whopper donation of $1,000 from T. Denny right before election day (the max an individual can give within a period of time). Should have just saved his money for another fancy hat for the Carneval Celebration. Well at least he did win a volunteer position on the rubber stamp committee.

Speaking of the Planning Commission, looks like the council may be throwing the Lacey Park project back at them for doing such a lousy job of review to begin with. Lloyd companies will be asking for a deferral tonight to September 13, but that may not cut it. Should be an interesting debate tonight at the council meeting.

Sioux Falls City Clerk’s office sloppy handling of finance reports

Last Wednesday (June 15) was the filing deadline for city council candidates to file their quarterly report. You may not think it is important, but this report has the final fundraising numbers before the election, and what funds may be left over for a future run.

I didn’t expect to see them online until Friday afternoon at the latest. I assumed that some candidates may have forgotten about the deadline and had to be called on Thursday.

Friday went by, but no postings online (though the city clerk admitted he did have all the reports and could be picked up in hard copy form at the clerk’s office). So now we are here on Monday, and if you check the listing online, only about half of the reports are up.

After our last experience with filing the reports, we would think the new city clerk learned a lesson about filing the reports in a timely manner. Especially a (very proud) retired military officer.

What’s that saying about not following orders?

Even if it takes a few days to file the reports online, in all fairness, they should have been filed at the same time. Ironic that the candidates that raised the least in the final days were put online before the big money boys. Coincidence?

Either way, very sloppy clerking.