The mayor finally weighs in. And as usual when you give him a microphone he can’t resist to go on.
He says that he wishes he could say what went on in the executive session. Huh? Did I miss something? You were not in the meeting, so who shared it with you? I thought those meetings were not recorded and the people in those meetings cannot share what is discussed? So who shared that information with him? Is that a violation of the executive session?
He also goes on about the attacks to the city clerk and the city attorney. He claims the city attorney doesn’t just work for him, he works for the city. That statement in itself is hilarious. When Danielson brought up ethics charges against the mayor, he couldn’t walk 100 feet to his hearing, and the city attorney stepped off the dais as the advisor to the Ethics Board and defended the mayor as his personal attorney.
As for the city clerk, that is still unresolved as far as I am concerned until a judge rules in the case tomorrow.
Once again the mayor admits to some interesting stuff over the 34 minute interview.