Grumpy Councilor blames it on the ‘Fake’ City Charter

Seems councilor Erpenbach had a change of heart, and decided that searching un-registered rental properties and charging them for it, probably doesn’t pass the smell test, OR the Constitution test. Seems the DRAFT ordinance has a couple of changes (DOC: rental-register). It seems the ‘Search and Destroy’ portion of the DRAFT ordinance has disappeared.

By l3wis

One thought on “I guess the Constitutionality of searching landlords leaky toilets stands”
  1. It would be practically impossible to prove a property is unregistered. It would cost more than revenue from fees to enforce this ridiculous requirement. I don’t have rental property here and wouldn’t. City code enforcement harassment prevents profit. If I did rent, I’d be proud to not register. There are so many jobs here because nobody can afford to rent due to expensive city controls.

Comments are closed.