2017

Argus Leader writes a poignant editorial about the Downtown Parking Ramp investors

Like most of us who follow city hall politics, the AL has written off this current council and mayor;

It’s a shame that city leaders – for reasons at worst nefarious and at best simply tone-deaf – seem determined to dig in their heels and undermine public confidence.

We call on current city councilors to insist on a framework of transparency.

We call on the future members of the council to make open dealings a top priority, to act as a check against the worst impulses of the executive.

And we call on the future mayor and his or her administration to learn from the lessons this administration refuses to accept, paving the way for a new era of accountability.

They also bring up the 700 pound gorilla in the room;

— Legacy guarantor Aaron Hultgren’s construction company was heavily fined by OSHA for workplace safety violations after last year’s downtown building collapse, which killed a construction worker at a property owned by Norm Drake and Legacy.

This is a huge red flag, especially after reading this story today in the AL;

Both Hultgren and Command Center appealed the penalties. The appeals mean that OSHA’s investigation isn’t closed. Which in turn means that the investigation isn’t available to the public or lawyers representing various parties who might have a claim because of the accident – whether it’s the family of McMahon, Emily Fodness, the young woman who firefighters rescued, or downtown business owners who lost sales when parts of the city were closed.

The two most serious citations against Hultgren were classified as “willful,” the most serious OSHA levies. Willful violations are given to employers who knowingly failed to comply with legal requirements or acted with indifference to employee safety.

As they point out, Mr. Hultgren could be sued for millions once the smoke clears. Why would the city want to sign an 80 contract with this guy? If the lawsuits ARE filed and are successful the city could be holding the bag on this project. It is likely we could have a very expensive parking ramp with an unfinished hotel attached to it. The blatant ignorance of the city’s legal counsel is astounding on this part of the deal.

Is Mayor Ramrod putting the cart in front of the horse?

Talking about horses, the mayor is chomping at the bit so bad to get this boondoggle of a parking ramp done, he is asking the city council to approve $246K in utility relocation expenses in Item #1 (consent agenda) on Tuesday at the council meeting BEFORE Items#44-45 are approved (the parking ramp contract).

Talk about confidence. Not even sure if this is procedurally legal? Where’s Fiddle-Faddle when you need someone to bend the rules?

While I will agree this will probably pass by a 6-2 vote, it seems pretty arrogant to ask the council to approve an expense that wouldn’t be necessary if the contract isn’t approved.

Oh, but it gets better. The administration is also so confident this will pass, they are also asking the council to approve the construction contract, admend the capital program and approve easements just a few minutes after the contract is approved. They couldn’t even give the council a week to review those documents after approval.

Just goes to show just how big of a scam this is, they have to ramrod it through ASAP.

DT Parking Ramp Contract Guarantor trying to skew the public opposition

I just attended Democratic Forum where councilors Starr and Stehly talked mostly about the parking ramp and (lack of) transparency in city government. Both Pat and Theresa got applauses throughout their presentation and Q & A. While there was no official poll or raised hands, it seemed pretty obvious that most people in the crowd were NOT supporting the ramp. One of the main reasons was the math just wasn’t adding up.

City councilors received this email from a concerned constituent today;

Good morning.

I received this email* this morning and felt compelled to contact you regarding the parking ramp project.

I DO NOT support this project until additional information is forth coming. There is an alarming lack of transparency in city government.

Please do not vote to move this forward.

Thank you.

*I will not show the email from Larry Canfield, one of the guarantors and investors in the public/private partnership, but to summarize he basically sent an email to friends and colleagues asking them to contact the city council in SUPPORT of the project.

As you can see, the person above was NOT very happy about receiving the email. I wonder how many others contacted the council with the same concerns?

I suspect there will be the normal flock of sheep in suits at the council meeting Tuesday supporting the project.