2017

‘Loving Vincent’ to play in Sioux Falls on Sunday

You can’t miss this movie!

The film brings the paintings of Vincent van Gogh to life to tell his remarkable story. Every one of the 65,000 frames of the film is an oil-painting hand-painted by 125 professional oil-painters who travelled from all across the world to the LOVING VINCENT studios in Poland and Greece to be a part of the production. As remarkable as Vincent’s brilliant paintings, is his passionate and ill-fated life, and mysterious death.

I have been following the progress of this movie for over a year.

Parade of Lights – Political Float BAN

I knew about this before last Friday’s Parade of Lights, but I didn’t want to spoil the parade for mayoral candidate David Z.

At first David was told he couldn’t put his ‘David Z’ for mayor car in the parade because the Parade of Lights has a ban on ‘political’ floats, you know, because of all that ‘family crap’ event (God forbid we expose the youngsters to politics), never mind all the commercialization of Christmas which turns a knot in my stomach more than any political candidate waving from a car.

David was allowed to be in the parade, but he had to ‘cover’ the ‘for mayor’ lettering on his car. David covered it so it said, ‘David Z as honest as Abe Lincoln’ and dressed himself in a holiday lighted version as America’s greatest president. Good for David, he rolled with it, I would not have.

Besides the fact that thousands of tax dollars are being spent on the winter wonderland (putting a private charity fundraiser out of business at Yankton Trail Park) and the fact that over a dozen of public works vehicles were featured in the parade. And most importantly DTSF receives property tax money for operational costs.

The Brookings Parade of Lights does not have a political float ban. So why does Sioux Falls?

We are constantly asking why we have such low voter turnout in municipal elections, well one of those reasons is that the city spends very little money promoting city elections. Organizations like DTSF doesn’t have a problem with TAKING our tax dollars, they just don’t want us to have a conversation about the politics in this community, they just want our money.

DTSF needs to END the political float ban, simply for the fact they receive public funding. If they want to keep their archaic rule about the ban, fine, we can take their public funding away and move the Parade of Lights to circle the Top Hat and Sunshine foods like the Zombie Walk parade.

A parking ramp or an excuse to build an expensive foundation?

 
Guest Post by Bruce Danielson
Questions not gaining any discussion in the new proposed Sioux Falls downtown parking ramp is who is paying for the foundation, why and how much. The construction of any building requires a foundation to anchor it to the ground. The much touted 2014 Walker Parking Study reported a parking ramp in downtown on the very same “fractured” quartzite stone would cost about $9 million. Why does this building all of a sudden have fractured stone problems?
According to city parking staff and studies, parking ramps have a 50 year life. What will happen to this ramp in 50 years with an 80 year building lease on top of it? 
 
How do we pay for upkeep when our reserve funds are all used up? We will be using all our reserve funds to build this ramp. The more we put our numbers together, the harder it is to see how it can pay for itself.
 
A $1million dollars for 80 years lease? No inflation factoring? No future value of money put into a formula? Using history (I know dangerous) as a guide, $1,000,000.00 in 1937 had the same buying power as $17,245,142.86 in 2017, the annual inflation over this period was about 3.62%. An example from savings.org tells us a conservative inflation rate of 3% over the next 80 years would be $10,640,890.56.
 
What’s a million bucks going to be worth in 2097? We know our mayor’s version of bucks is not likely to be the same as ours but we must consider real money and not the funny money of a subprime credit card salesman. 
 
What will the future residents of Sioux Falls accuse us of when the lease ends? How are these residents suppose to fund the implosion of this building when the lease ends? Why is there no discussion of this in the grand plans for the parking ramp? Every longterm rental agreement has inflation adjustments and site cleanup, why not this one?
So many questions and no consistent answers. The story changes every time there is another question not fitting the city narrative.

Another broken promise of the indoor pool?

Remember one of the big promises of the indoor pool? Water rehab for veterans;

The only reason I have been given from people at the VA Hospital for not using the aquatic center is that the two government entities, city and federal, can’t agree on how to fund it. Hard for me to believe.

Not me. The VA said from the beginning said they had no plans of partnership with the aquatic center, but city hall continued to peddle the lie. As you can see, just another broken promise.

Sioux Falls Parks Board Meeting, Nov 21, 2017

Every month the Sioux Falls Parks Board has a meeting they claim does not set policy or make decisions but they vote anyway.

AGENDA DOC (This includes the pool attendance numbers): 2017-11-14 Park & Rec Board

On November 21, 2017 was just another meeting of their denial. The Midco pool isn’t doing so well, the golf courses are losing money and now setting rates for the new managers to use plus we find out when the meetings are for 2018. This meeting of under 15 minutes was so important it had to start early?