2017

TenHaken asks a great question

I would really like to hear the answer to to why young people don’t vote in city elections. Sure, they show up to rallies, and like you on FB, but historically, they don’t vote. I don’t think this city election will be any different. In fact I rarely hear a person younger than me talk about city politics except my like minded friends.

I really believe it has a lot to do with Republicans in this state squashing voter rights and gerrymandering, they don’t want younger people voting, because they tend to vote more progressive and independent.

The musical precincts don’t help either. Younger folks like things to be easy and having to find their precinct is ‘work’. It’s not that they are not smart enough to do it, they are just lazy.

Until the city does a better job of educating younger folks on voting, the 55 and older crowd are going to rule the roost when it comes to city elections. I wish the younger candidates like Jolene luck, but you better be filling out voter registration cards and giving rides to the polls if you think your younger supporters are going to show up to the polls in April.

I don’t like it either, but it’s reality.

Happy Thanksgiving? (H/T Kolache Frank)

Not so much for farmers;

Consumers are paying less and farmers are receiving less for this year’s Thanksgiving feast, the National Farmers Union (NFU) and American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) said in this year’s annual holiday food surveys.

Farmers and ranchers are receiving 11.4 cents for every dollar that consumers spend for Thanksgiving dinner, according to the NFU Farmer’s Share publication. The Thanksgiving Farmer’s Share compares the Thanksgiving retail food prices to what farmers receive.

Farmer’s feed the world . . . for less and less every year.

What happened to Slater Barr?

Maybe he went to pursue his dancing career?

I’m guessing that wasn’t in his cards. Announced suddenly out of nowhere yesterday;

Sioux Falls Development Foundation president Slater Barr resigned suddenly Tuesday, following almost a decade at the economic development organization.

Of course the rumors are out there. Did he get a sudden great job opportunity? Was he just fed up and walked? Was he fired? Heck, I don’t know, really don’t care. We all know we will never hear the real story. We know how it works in the tiny little corporate world in Sioux Falls.

I did hear though behind the scenes Slater may have been pro state income tax. Like most logical people in this state we know that the sales tax model is NOT sustainable and will only continue to keep our state and city in the hole. With the continuing gap between rich and poor in our city, state and country and the disintegration of the middle class, people are spending less and less and trying to get the best deals online. A state income tax on corporations and the upper class is the only solution to pulling South Dakota out of this mess we have created by having greedy Republicans run our state. Tax cuts and incentives to the rich do not trickle down to the rest of us. That is a myth.

Publicly, I have heard Slater talk about higher wages and bringing higher wage companies to Sioux Falls, this also may have contributed to his demise. As we know the status quo is plenty happy with the wage collusion going on in our city. The irony is if we pay workers a living wage we would be less dependent on food banks and homeless shelters. They would also spend more money which would boost the local economy. I have always said, we don’t have an affordable housing problem in Sioux Falls we have a wage problem in Sioux Falls. Maybe Slater just got tired of the fight and said SeeYah!