2017

Sioux Falls City Council anoints a new Dr. No

Meet the Council’s new Dr. No

Well, Rex Rolfing has been working on it for awhile, and after voting against recording the Park Board meetings tonight (Erpenbach also voted no) he has cemented the deal. He also wanted to vote against gifting the Glory House city land, but realizing he was out numbered he voted for it.

I want to say bravo to the city council for standing up for transparency in government tonight. It’s easy to do the right thing. There really is no excuse for closed government. Heck, even at one point, Rolfing suggested we should be fair and record all board meetings (but didn’t offer an amendment) he was just being cynical as usual.

Sioux Falls Affordable Housing Crisis

Cory beat me to this post (thank you). I figured he would do a much better job of analyzing the situation;

As a primary solution, ARI advocates coordination among all actors in affordable housing: the city, state, non-profits, and developers.

But remember: collectivism is a response to market failure. Even amidst 2.3% unemployment, Sioux Falls employers are failing to provide their scarce workers with the wages they need to support the renovation and construction of decent cheap houses. Since our captains of industry and bumper-car owners are being stingy, we have to run around drawing cooperation lines on concept maps and pouring tax incentives and federal grants into housing efforts.

Ironically I had this conversation Saturday with Mayoral hopeful Nick Weiland. I told him that the city needs to have less focus on annexation and urban sprawl and a push for fixing up our core, central and proper areas of Sioux Falls, which basically is 41st street to Russell and Kiwanis to Cleveland Ave (my educated guess). I’m not just talking sewer/water, roads and curb and gutter, I’m talking properties. This area of town has some of the most affordable housing in our city, unfortunately many of these single family homes and four-plex apartments also need some TLC. But they are perfect for affordable housing. The solution I have offered for several years is to change our TIF program to include landlords and single family homeowners willing to invest in these core houses and apartments and have any other loose ends tied up with low interest or no interest loans from community development or other state and federal programs. If we can give TIFs to luxury condos (Washington Square) we can certainly turn the program over to people willing to help out with our affordable housing glut.

The other issue is that housing costs are not in line with wages in Sioux Falls, and the regressive sales tax system is not helping matters.

At the end of the day, while a study like this is comprehensive and needed, it didn’t tell us anything new. It takes more then a report to change things, it takes a big boot up the asses of our local and state lawmakers to change the rules of tax incentives to get the ball rolling on this.

The ‘Real’ cost of the Washington Pavilion

Yes, another ‘rosy’ story about our shining purple giant downtown. Things are not so bad afterall;

Looking to build on the progress of his predecessors Larry Toll and Scott Petersen, who served as co-presidents during the Pavilion’s first profitably successful years, Smith is going all in on giving the 350,000-square-foot facility a makeover, authorizing a three-quarter-million investment in the three-level Kirby Science Discovery Center, new paint throughout the building and nearly a half-million worth of new flooring on the way. More changes are planned for the year with a restructure of the attraction’s front lobby and more big dollar investments in the upper floors.

Sounds great doesn’t it? We’ll get back to above paragraph;

While final numbers aren’t in yet, Smith said 2016 will mark another year of gains for the Pavilion and the projection for 2017 is another year in the black. All the while, the amount of public dollars the facility is relying on continues to decrease.

Historically, the annual contribution from the city’s entertainment tax has made up about 20 percent or more of the Pavilion’s operating budget – which was around $7.5 million last year. In 2016, 22 percent of its budget was covered with taxpayer dollars, but that’s expected to dip to 17 percent in 2017, Smith said.

“It will always be important for the city to play a role in supporting it, but I also think a lot of people would like to see the private portion of the pie get larger every year,” he said. “So were going to take a pretty significant jump toward achieving that.

Bravo to Smith for getting subscriber and member numbers up, bravo also to him for trying to reduce the (operational) subsidy. But don’t be fooled by the numbers. Like the Events Center, while the Pavilion may be tackling it’s operational expenses, the maintenance and mortgage doesn’t come cheap, and doesn’t come from operational.

Back to to the first paragraph of the story;

authorizing a three-quarter-million investment in the three-level Kirby Science Discovery Center, new paint throughout the building and nearly a half-million worth of new flooring on the way. More changes are planned for the year with a restructure of the attraction’s front lobby and more big dollar investments in the upper floors.

What is not evident in this story is that these ‘investments’ don’t come from the Pavilion’s operational budget, they don’t even come from private investors. Since the city owns the Pavilion (building) we are responsible for all new construction and maintenance. The WP Management doesn’t spend one single penny on these things. The money comes from our 2nd penny CIP, the same place where are road money comes from. So every time the Pavilion spends $500K on carpeting, that is $500K less spent on filling potholes. It’s easy to talk about the operational success of a facility when you have a separate entity subsidizing your structure. It would be like having a retail business in a building that you don’t have to pay a lease on.

It seems Smith learned well from his old boss at city hall. Smoke and Mirrors.

To Grant or Not Street (Jan 3, 2017)

Is this a misunderstanding, a good project gone bad or just plainly a mistake? Grant Street is one of those forgotten pieces and places of Sioux Falls. A neighborhood without the promised neighbors, a mud road instead of the promised paved street all courtesy of poor planning on the part of the city of Sioux Falls.

Grant Street is a forgotten place in need of our help. It should not be an industrial park because of a flying fickled finger of fate put it in a battle to be livable. On January 3, 2017 the Grant Street neighbors banded together to fight a development of storage units instead of the once promised twin homes with a city street.

Fix the street, fix the neighborhood and make it something any of us would be willing to live in. The city of Sioux Falls allowed this problem to exist, now solve it.

Ethics & Represent SD at Dem Forum (Jan 13, 2017)

Corruption is illegal in America? When did this happen? Who knows this? If this is true, who snuck this into the rule book? Does South Dakota use this rule book? Does Sioux Falls count? Anybody let the Sioux Falls City Attorney and pseudo Ethics Board know anything about this?

So many questions and no answers even though the voters of South Dakota tried to do something about it last November when they voted overwhelmingly to begin the effort to open up the books for all to see. The Sioux Falls Democratic Forum put the Open Government efforts on the wall for all to see when they invited Represent South Dakota to address the crowd on January 13, 2017.

Doug Kronaizl and Mark Winegar of Represent SD brings a message of ethics and responsibility to reality for all to see.

We are in a time when those who are in power are struggling to shut out everyone else. We voters are stupid, gullible, uninformed and hoodwinked for demanding our “leaders” be open in all ways if they are chosen to be help us. Being an officeholders does not mean we give you the keys to the treasury to do as you please. It does not mean you are to take everything so the next officeholder has to start from scratch.

In the November vote, the voters said we do not fully trust our officeholders or as Saint Ronnie liked to say, “Trust but verify”.