Once again the mayor’s cheerleaders come out to brag about breaking another building permit record this year. I have often argued that we shouldn’t be counting public projects because that is an expenditure to taxpayers, and NOT and economic booster. For instance, the administration building will cost taxpayers $1 million a year in mortgage, in essence to solve a $100K lease payment we had. This is $1 million we are taking away from our road funds.

Just in the top 15 projects we had almost $28 million in public projects.

I think it should be broken down into 3 categories;

• Private for profit/housing, etc.

• Private non or not for profit (Hospitals for example)

• Public (City, County, School District, Higher education)

What do you think? Should public projects be included?

By l3wis

One thought on “Should Public Projects count towards building permits?”
  1. And there’s the building permits issued but retracted like the house at McKennon Park.

Comments are closed.