I will admit, as a middle-aged white dude, I have no idea if the SFPD profiles. I have heard stories before, but just rumors. One of my Lakota friends used to tell me whenever he gets pulled over by the police it is for DWI. I said, “What?” He replied, “Driving While Indian.”

This past Sunday though I saw something that makes me suspect that the profiling is shared between who is reporting it, and how the officer reacts. Shortly I will tell you about an incident I saw on Sunday afternoon, but a short introduction first.

If you have ever been downtown you will notice a bike and pedestrian crosswalk on 6th street between Phillips Avenue and Raven. The sidewalk/bike trail continues South right in front of Raven’s front door, than goes past an open amphitheater and across a pedestrian bridge bought and paid for by taxpayers. The sidewalk in front of Raven’s, IMO, is quasi-public.

This Sunday after enjoying some brunch at my new favorite restaurant, The Blarney Stone, I rode my bike to Falls Park. It was packed, if I had to guess there was about 200 people down there. The water was high due to the snow melt and many adults and children were walking very close to the rushing water. As I have mentioned in the past, you can’t legislate ignorance, but what surprised me the most was there wasn’t one single person from the Parks Department, Fire Department or Police Department monitoring the visitors and reminding them to stay away from the water. There wasn’t even any temporary fencing.

But hey, I get it. The SFPD is short staffed and they have better things to do, or so I thought.

I proceeded to 6th street on the bike trail and crossed the bridge going towards Raven. As I was crossing the bridge I saw a cop car speed past and pull into Raven’s parking lot. As I started to ride past the entrance I saw a police officer talking to what appeared to me as a wedding party taking photos in front of the building. Mind you, it was obvious they were there to take pictures, the entire family, about a dozen of them and two photographers were dressed in their wedding best with the wedding party in tuxes. They also didn’t appear to be touching anything on the building, just standing in front using the quartzite walls as a backdrop. They were having an engaged conversation with the officer, who stood there and monitored the situation. Now most would wonder why a PO would have to monitor this. It occurred to me that someone at Raven must have saw them on a security camera and called it in. I know, probably still scratching your head why anyone would think a wedding party not disturbing the property taking photos would cause such an alarm. Than I wondered if it had anything to do with these very nicely dressed people (I don’t even have a wardrobe that nice) being African refugees (I could overhear them speaking in their native language).

First off, if makes you wonder if the person who called this in was profiling, but what disturbed me even more as I sat and watched this was the officer stayed there while they continued to snap photos. You could tell by the quite loud conversation that the wedding party seemed either confused or upset that an officer would respond to this situation.

So when I hear our officers are understaffed, all I have to point to is an officer monitoring an obvious photo session while hundreds of people are standing dangerously close to the falls and wonder if they really are understaffed or if they are profiling?

Not sure. But it didn’t look good.

4 Thoughts on “Does the SFPD profile, or is it more of a symptom of who is reporting?

  1. Fluff Mc Fluffin on April 24, 2018 at 3:43 pm said:

    So the police, by your own admission, responded to something called in by a citizen? And they didn’t arrest anyone? Those racist bastards!

  2. l3wis on April 24, 2018 at 3:58 pm said:

    Didn’t say they were racist. What surprised me besides the fact some idiot called in a wedding party taking pictures on a public sidewalk is that after the officer determined there was no threat he didn’t just leave and do something better. Hanging out while they were taking the photos is a form of intimidation. After he assessed the situation there was NO reason he had to stay. It was weird.

  3. You should run a sting operation on this one. You could have four black guys walk down 41st Street at dusk with Bruce filming in the distance and see what happens. Then a week or two later you should do it with four white guys under the same conditions.

    A couple of years ago I reported an incident to a SF police officer and he claimed it wasn’t right but that he couldn’t do anything about it because of “liberal judges.” This is a true story involving a threat on Facebook against one my family members… He eventually reach out to the person who made the threat to warn them, but not until after I and the officer debated for a few minutes by phone…. I realize that we all have our political views, but when you are a police officer you should not be attacking our judicial system with such ignorant generalities, especially when a police officer, in more ways than one, is an agent of our overall criminal/judicial system.

  4. D@ily Spin on April 24, 2018 at 5:36 pm said:

    Police need the raise Huether deprived them of. With an improved attitude and focused sensitivity training, this issue can be improved upon. I think officers should have body cameras always on. It documents their action so there’s no unsubstantiated confusion. Video is invaluable evidence. There are times an officer is violent to protect himself yet a minority screams discrimination.
    We all know these actions will not happen. It’s why the first thing citizen witnesses do is take a cell phone video.

Post Navigation