A South DaCola foot soldier sent me this interesting 990 data on what L & C spent on lobbyists over the years (DOC): Lewis-N-Clark-990s

It’s interesting to see the slow dribble of money coming into the organization (except for suckering the taxpayers of Sioux Falls for $80 million – which saved them).

I have often argued L & C was created to give a couple dozen people who make 6 figures a year something to bitch about our Federal Government.

Get in line. It gets longer every day.

By l3wis

6 thoughts on “Lewis & Clark really needs a new lobbyist”
  1. Just for curiosity, what was the amount of federal monies that the lobbyist obtained for L and C during that same time? Yes 1.5 million is a bunch, but maybe not all that much when you consider the return on investment….

  2. I like water. People in Madison and Worthington and Sheldon like water. Lewis & Clark is one of those government funded projects that is necessary and is a success.

  3. Unfortunately, lobbying is required for this substantiated project. Annual here is kinda ‘Oh Well’.

  4. I would agree it is a good project, but it should have been done 10-15 years ago. That is my point, it just seems like sometime they are just dragging this out to keep the consultants busy.

  5. Lewis & Clark needed and needs ongoing lobbying support because the federal government, including Congress, has forgotten the deal South Dakota made when Oahe was built. The payments for L & C look like pork when, in fact, they’re deferred compensation for the state’s loss of land mass to a federal project decades ago.

    Changes in federal staff and Congress mean that there is a perpetual need for education on the history and justification for the appropriations.

Comments are closed.