2018

UPDATE: TenHaken promises transparency as mayor, but won’t answer questions about his previous involvement with Mike Rounds

UPDATE: Jo goes after Paul on Facebook. Paul calls it a ‘Nothing Burger’. What the heck is a ‘Nothing Burger’. Must be something the ‘Evengelist of Downtown’ serves at BBQ’s.

Like Huether, he says there is ‘nothing to see’ and kills the messenger.

—————————-

You know what they say, politicians will say almost anything to get your vote. Remember Mayor Huether as a candidate? He promised to be one of the most transparent mayors ever. I know, funny stuff 🙁

So when the Argus asks TenHaken a question about being involved with a trolling investigation, he says this;

TenHaken declined to comment for this story.

“In 2014, Click Rain was contracted by the Rounds for Senate campaign to dig into some libel/slander against various parties,” he said in an email. “I would be breaking my former client’s trust by commenting on your story.”

First off, you are no longer employed by Click Rain. Secondly, Rounds is elected public official, what’s the big secret? If you can’t even answer a simple question about this incident, how will your relationship be with the media when you are mayor? Probably like Mayor Huether’s. I have often thought of TenHaken as the Republican version of Mike Huether.

A few months ago I had my own little ‘doxing’ incident going on. Someone was commenting on my site and making disparaging comments about a city councilor. I know what you are thinking, myself as well as other anon commenters make those remarks everyday on my site. This was different though. The first suspicion I had was they were a new commenter. I often check the IP’s of new commenters. This one was different, the IP was linked to the city’s network. The comments were coming from a city owned computer during the middle of the morning and afternoon. I assumed it was a city employee making the comments. When this city councilor asked the city’s IT department what computer the IP was linked to they told them, “From the library’s public use computers.”

Yeah right.

I guess this commenter was so upset with this city councilor they went to the library in the middle of the morning, logged in and made the comments. And when they had to respond, they returned to the library almost 4 hours later to make more comments. But when they made even more comments later that night it came from a residential Midco IP. After the inquiry this ‘person’ stopped making comments altogether. Go figure. I did some research on my side, but without having access to the city’s network OR Midco’s it was nearly impossible for me to track the user. My concern wasn’t that a person was making these kind of comments, that is their 1st Amendment right. But it is a violation for a city employee to be making these comments about a councilor on city time, using city property, most likely ending in termination.

Back to Paul.

Cory brings up something I have known about Mr. TenHaken for a very long time;

And if nothing else, TenHaken’s involvement in the hyper-defensive Rounds campaign’s internal dirty tricks should dispel any misconception that TenHaken is just a nice nonpartisan guy looking to serve his city. He’s a long-time, well-connected Republican hack, a shade more technically adept but no less partisan than Pat Powers. His involvement in RINOMike-gate could show that, if he succeeds Mike Huether as mayor, he be just as brittle about criticism of his administration, and he’ll be willing to deploy his technical skills to root out his perceived enemies.

Besides the fact that he was trying to get the help of a public university to do his dirty work, it shows what lengths Mr. TenHaken will go through to bury enemies of his right-winger clients, ironically defending one of the most corrupt governors the State of South Dakota has ever had.

That could not have been an easy job.

The City builds 100 year buildings. Really?

Not sure why I was thinking about this, but recently Rex Rolfing said that city buildings like the admin building cost more because the city builds buildings to last 100 years.

Not sure what buildings he was referring to?

Let’s look at City Hall, it has weathered well but has needed upgrades.

The only other building I can think of is the Arena, ironically a building we want to tear down. Good luck.

Let’s look at this stellar resume of ‘100 year old’ buildings.

Canaries Stadium. As I understand it, it was built in the 90’s and is falling apart. Some have suggested we bulldoze it.

Convention Center. This place has seen many repairs. In fact it’s roof repair was part of the siding settlement.

Washington Pavilion. Supposed to cost $19 million and cost more than $50 million to date, including two roof repairs, and fixing the foundation, and more fixes to come.

Aquatic Center. As I understand it one of the pools needed to be fixed for a leak shortly after being opened.

Events Center. A building that has siding that has to be checked more often than an patient with Heart Disease.

Now we come to the $25 million dollar Admin building. I guess we will have to wait and see how it holds up, but if history has taught us anything, the city doesn’t have a stellar record of building ‘100 year old’ buildings.

The thought was nice though Rex.

Sioux Falls Central District Council Candidate Curt Soehl says nobody reads the Argus or Facebook

This wasn’t the first time Curt pulled a funny at a Forum (even though I think he was serious). At the Multi-Housing Forum he said he got rid of his rental property because renters are a ‘pain in the butt’.

Tonight at the Chamber forum (2nd Half of Forum) he decided to bag on the Argus and Facebook (several times) about how no one reads them anymore. Hey, who can blame him, we all know an Argus endorsement is a kiss of death, ask Daschle.

While I will defend Soehl that home deliveries of the dead tree version are way down, I’m guessing online readership is higher (especially when stories online show up almost 24-72 hours before they print).

As for Facebook, they can defend themselves, something they are busy at these days.

I got the feeling that in some weird way Curt was trying to defend the current council and mayor by killing the messenger.

I know that Curt wants to believe what his donors are telling him is the truth, but the corruption runs deep and it is real. As one other council candidate in the central district said tonight, Thor Bardon, unlike others running in this race he can’t be bought by donors.

I guess that would explain Curt’s Kool-Aid mustache. But you didn’t read it in the Argus.

Why isn’t Sioux Falls City Councilor Rick Kiley participating in Forums?

No challengers. No Problem. Suck it.

Technically Rick doesn’t have to debate since he is an incumbent without a challenger.

But I had two different people tonight ask why he just doesn’t do it as a courtesy.

Good question.

I know in the past I have seen incumbents with no challengers participate in candidate forums, just to give voters a refresher of who they are and what they plan to do in the next term.

Maybe Rick doesn’t want us to know what he will be doing in the next 4 years. So much for transparency. I wonder if he knows that Huether will be gone after May 15th?

UPDATE: Jamison Campaign gets UNSOLICITED $47,000 donation

Imagine you are running for mayor of Sioux Falls, and without asking, a national organization drops you a cool $47,000 to help you with direct mail.

That was the surprise the Jamison campaign got last week when they donated that amount.

But here is the amazing part of the donation, according to the finance report document, they gave the money without asking Jamison (DOC: National-Association-Realtors-DON)

WOW!

UPDATE: The latest mailing;