August 2024

Allowing EXTRA Public Input for Developers setting a BAD precedent

While I think MOST of the council is against this, it will be interesting to hear the council discuss this item (#79) the italics are the changes;

30.015 ADDRESSING THE COUNCIL; TIME LIMIT.
(a) Public input shall be allowed for any item on the regular agenda. Each person addressing the city council shall step up to the microphone in front of the rail, shall give his or her name in an audible tone of voice for the record, and unless further time is granted by the presiding officer, shall be limited to three minutes on any ordinance receiving a first reading; and on the date of final adoption by the city council, five minutes shall be allowed. If the regular agenda item is quasi-judicial as defined by state law or a zoning ordinance, the private applicant shall be invited first to provide public input and allowed an additional three minutes for rebuttal following public input. Rebuttal by the applicant shall only be allowed to respond to earlier testimony provided during public input. The city council has the right to overrule the presiding officer’s use of discretion pursuant to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (latest edition).

I am against this because there is also a process in place with Robert’s Rules that allows the chair of the meeting to call up an applicant or ANY inputer to the podium for additional testimony. I not even opposed to that applicant physically raising their hand to talk more so they can be recognized by the chair. But giving more time to the proponents is unfair to the process. Leave it as is. If you need more information, call them up. This is NOT broken.

I guess ONE applicant complained. We don’t need to be changing public input because one whiny person complained. I know who it WAS, and they WERE NOT a developer just a business owner trying to destroy a residential neighborhood around his office.

Drinking Liberally (August 2, 2024)

In Politics: Nationally: Kamala Harris is exciting Democrats and invigorating the Obama/Biden coalition. She has overtaken “The Donald” Trump in polling averages and Republicans have been caught off-foot for a change. It may be a bit of a honeymoon phase but there is substance in the shifting political winds and, with hard work, Democrat may celebrate a victory this fall.

The word against “The Donald” these days is that he and MAGA Republicans are “weird” . “The Donald” has provided us with numerous examples during the last eight years, none weirder, more telling, and more uncomfortable than his interview with the Black Journalist Association. Here is a link to the full interview. Draw your own conclusion;

Mine? Weird!!! And he is the Republican Presidential  candidate.

The scary thing is that the election is very close and many of our fellow citizens take solace in “The Donald’s” candidacy.

 I play in a poker league of 30 to 40 mainly white males, 25 to 65 years old on Tuesday nights and this week, after Biden stepped down and it became apparent that Vice-President Harris would replace him as the Democratic Presidential nominee, I was taken aback by the aggressive political talk (there usually isn’t any) against Vice-President Harris from many of the people at the tables. It was as mean as anything you have heard publicly and it was expressed aggressively with certitude. I finally asked if they would choose a man convicted as a felon 34 times by a jury of his peers. This didn’t seem to have much effect. It is scary. There was even speculation of civil war if Trump loses. 

The New York Times has an article that tries to explain Trump’s appeal. I link it here for everyone’s edification: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/07/25/us/race-wealth-gap-economy.html?campaign_id=9&emc=edit_nn_20240725&instance_id=129691&nl=the-morning®i_id=15266483&segment_id=173089&te=1&user_id=bf7f68c027dbeeacc1307445a35ef609

The point here (IMHO) is that, as James Carvelle said, “It is the economy, stupid”.  Trump doesn’t present a solution to solve the economic angst of the working middle class but he does offer them scapegoats to excuse their economic frustration. His appeal is racist, misogynist, homophobic, and autocratic but it has been effective. Democrats need to call it what it is by appealing to our fellow citizens better natures but we also need to present an economic program that appeals to them and provides them hope for the future and their ability to partake in the “American Dream”. 

From what I have observed so far, Kamala Harris “gets it”.

In Politics: In South Dakota: I keep waiting for visible signs of campaigning by South Dakota Democratic candidates and The South Dakota Democratic Party (SDDP) without much success. The SDDP has a Communication person on staff but the SDDP has only produced five press releases in July.  Maybe I am blind to the normally frantic activity of campaign season because I am not a big user of Social Media.

Reviewing the SDDP’s voter registration efforts and its overall success we find that they made absolute progress, increasing their Statewide registration by 90 voters since the beginning of July. Unfortunately, for statewide, GOP voter registration increased by 1568 voters during the same period. `The SDDP received $70,000.00 several months ago to work on voter registration. Thankfully that money is showing some results though it is a work in progress at best.