GO AFTER THE FRICKIN’ CONFLICT OF INTEREST THE COVER UP AND THE LIES!
Okay, that was my vent. A judge has granted a hearing for the Argus vs. the Scab. I have said that the Argus has a case if they go after the blatant conflict of interest with every single councilor KNOWING in advance of the vote that Matt Paulson was an investor and that he gave to every single person sitting on the dais’ campaigns. The worst part was the council and the Scab hid it from the public. That’s deception on the highest level, not only by council but by the Scab. On top of it, the only blogger covering city politics for 20 years gets told in a nasty text message from one of the owners that him and the other main writers are the only owners . . . until they weren’t.
If the Argus argues this on the original premise of not posting investor info in advance, they will lose the case. Go after the conflicts.