Look at at this change to policies, (page 13) they are trying to find cover from their Constitutional duties;
Robert’s is a guideline on how to run a meeting, but those RULES do not supersede the 1st Amendment or US Constitution. Like I told the council last Tuesday (FF: 1:10) these are consideration rules that the public AND the council should use as a guideline to the meetings, but when it comes to PUBLIC INPUT anything besides violent threats is allowable and limiting speakers is blatant censorship and little else.
Instead of spending so much time trying to silence the public, why don’t you talk to us? The only time I see councilors is at Carnegie, makes you wonder if some of them are playing Marshall Selberg Musical Districts on us? Speaking of that crooked fella, still wondering why all the councilors and mayor shirked their responsibility of managing their own? Selberg should have been booted from the council and he should have been charged, but not these guys, circle the f’ing wagons.
Did anyone the Trump dance party featuring Krist Noem?
Dance Party USA: Featuring Donald and Kristi
Who is this Robert guy, anyhow? AND, is his last name really Rules?…… AND, why should we listen to him? Plus, what stops one of us from writing a rule book like this? Because, who does Robert really think he is, E.F. Hutton?
When there’s transparency there will be trust