2024

What’s going on at Dakotanews?

l3wis December 18, 2024 4Comments

On Monday ‘KSFY’ posted this job ad;

I have been suspicious for awhile that the experiment they are running at DN will hit aground. Over the past couple of months I have noticed that their website is ‘glitchy’ and stories and vids don’t match up. I have also noticed half-ass production on the live broadcasts with mics cutting out, teleprompters not working (because the on-air talents have to wing it) and recently Brian Allen cancelled his ‘Matters of the State’ program with little explanation. Now they are looking for a News Director. I have asked some people who have ties to DN and they said ‘They may be downsizing thru attrition’. I didn’t think I would say this since I have gotten pretty beaten up by the media while they lift my story leads, but I am worried about our media being attacked as ‘fake news’ and now the future Orange Menace Whitehouse Occupant wants to start suing news organizations who said bad things about him (which are completely true). ABC caving to him was disgusting. I wonder if anyone at that organization has read about the lead up to power in the 1930’s in Germany. They are virtually using the same playbook and the news orgs are bailing. I was glad to hear that Gannet will fight the polling lawsuit, they should win, but our courts have become ‘Trump’ courts. I have always concluded the best way to fight this BS is to double down on the criticism and keep hammering until you can’t hammer anymore.

1st Amendment Developers Development Downtown Sioux Falls religion Riverline District SF City Council Sioux Falls

Why is the city lending a religious organization $500K?

l3wis December 17, 2024 1Comments

This money will come out of the Community Development funds. (Item #6, Sub-Item 28):

Agreement for a redevelopment project located within the All Saints Neighborhood and the Sherman Historical District, tRE ministries, $500K (interest free loan).

I received a Community Development loan about 20 years ago for needed upgrades to my house, my loan was about $4,500 with a 2% interest rate. I guess I am wondering why we would take this much for ONE project when we could rehabilitate 40-50 houses with this money instead? And I mean ‘Rehab’ not demolition, which is what this money will be spent on. There is also the questionable relationship with the developer who is worth millions from video lottery, liquor and Med MJ (unless he has already handed over ownership). Why isn’t he just loaning them the money? I also don’t think tax dollars should go to non-profits (religious organizations) since they pay very little taxes and the fact they have a Daddy Warbucks taking care of them (who ironically makes money from sin taxation). I actually support this project to clean up that part of town but like any development with private parties, they need to pony up the money, but NOT in Sioux Falls, GRIFT, GRIFT, GRIFT. I thought at least ONE councilor would vote against this, but who am I kidding. The mayor wants to turn the entire town into a mega-church. Ick.

MAYOR FIRST AMENDMENT DENIER, INTERRUPTS A CITIZEN, AGAIN

Poops was at it again tonight, ignoring his Constitutional duties and denying a commenter his input. (FF: 1:44:00) Jordan Deffenbaugh came up tonight to talk about how housing would be affected by the Riverline District and the mayor cut him off saying this was already discussed. Oh, Paul, we have been over this, you can’t control the narrative at the podium that is a violation of their 1st Amendment rights but you seem to be above that. I wonder what it is like to take an oath on the Bible, surrounded by friends, family and colleagues and once installed ignore all those constitutional ‘thingies’. Paul, it may not be me, but the city and specifically you as the chair will be sued and it isn’t going to be pretty. Maybe they will let you on one of those East Coast TV morning shows where you can talk about your lack of knowledge when it comes to the Constitution and the lawsuit should be dismissed because of your stupidity. Stranger things have happened.

Downtown Sioux Falls Riverline District Sioux Falls

CORRECTION: Is the Riverline District just a gigantic scam?

l3wis December 17, 2024 3Comments

CORRECTION: The city will GET the $8 million back IF the deal falls thru. BUT, this is interest FREE and NO taxes will be paid on the property for 3 years. I guess my question is ‘Why would we buy property for a project that hasn’t been approved by voters or the council?’ It’s insanity. Usually the city gets approval before they move ahead with an ‘agreement’ with current property owners. Or better yet, why doesn’t Lloyd just sit on the property for 3 years if we waive the property taxes? Or why doesn’t the Development Foundation buy the land? Taxpayers ARE NOT speculators. We give you the money to spend on infrastructure and services not to buy a plot of land that may never come to fruition.

The more I look at this ‘deal’ (Item 29) the more it looks like a money scam and NOT an actual Convention Center. If you read the purchase agreement, one thing is for sure; The city is buying the land for $8 MILLION and ‘gifting’ it to the Development Foundation. WHY? Well if you read carefully the purchase agreement you will SEE that the land reverts BACK to the original owners in 3 years if nothing is done, State Partners, LLC, which looks like they are brokering the deal thru Ernst Capital (which one of the partners is Chris Daugaard, yes the son of the former governor and partner Todd Ernst, son-in-law to Craig Lloyd.) It appears they are brokering the deal for Lloyd. Either way, if the Convention Center fails (which it will) the property reverts back to the original owners and they DO NOT have to give that $8 million back. In other words we are GIVING the Development Foundation AND State Partners, LLC. $8 million to play with over the next 3 years. Even if the CC was legit, there is NO WAY it will even pass, we will need a 3rd penny revenue source to pay for this, and I think most people are like, F’ that. If the Development Foundation really wants a new CC why don’t you borrow the money and pay for the land yourself and if the CC passes a vote, then we will buy it from you.

Why is the city in the land speculation business?

This is just a money scam to make a lot of people a lot of money and little else. I encourage folks to attend the council meeting tonight and call out this scam for what it is; A LAND GRAB!

Downtown Sioux Falls Railroads Sioux Falls

UPDATE: What Quiet Zone?

l3wis December 17, 2024 3Comments

UPDATE: I was at this same quiet zone yesterday around 11:30 AM and once again, the crossbars came down, the lights flashed and the train pulled up and blared it’s horn. Why did we build this if the RR isn’t going to bother using it? The recent passing of a transient trying to jump over a moving train is further proof that the trains DTSF need to go. I am hoping someone in Public Works has asked the RRs to use these quiet zones properly and STOP blaring the horn!

So they put a quiet zone RR crossing east of the new $20 Million dollar Non-Unity 6th Street bridge. How they are ‘supposed’ to work is the arms come down, there is a bunch of flashing lights, etc. It is called a quiet zone because ideally the trains won’t blow their whistles anymore going thru this intersection. I have suggested we have them all over DTSF.

So I was sitting at the crossing last week on my bike, and a train was approaching, the lights started flashing to stop and the cross arms came down. Then right before the intersection the engine stopped, which is normal protocol. The lights were flashing and the bars were down, and guess what Leroy the conductor did, blaired his horn.

So what was the purpose of this very expensive crossing? (I believe it cost like $1 million to build with money coming from the city, the DOT and the railroad). So what was the purpose if the trains are going to continue to blow their whistles?

The railroads have been doing what they want to for around 150 years. Did they really think they care if this is a quiet zone? Apparently not.

Sioux Falls

Why has the bicycle committee been skipping meetings?

l3wis December 16, 2024 1Comments

So the Sioux Falls Bicycle Committee has been skipping meetings over the past couple of months and if you do a search on the city website it has been almost scrubbed from the site. The Active Transportation committee has taken recommendations from the group, but if those meetings don’t exist how do you take recommendations?

If you want to kill the committee, just do it. Bring a resolution forward at the city council meeting and dissolve it.

Please stop playing games.

If the new board has taken over these duties, just say it and move on.

I sometimes feel like when I ride bike in this town I am all alone, and that is not a bad thing since I enjoy my own company 🙂 but it is dangerous, and I really don’t think I have the city’s back on this, I am on my own.

What’s going on at Dakotanews?

Why is the city lending a religious organization $500K?

CORRECTION: Is the Riverline District just a gigantic scam?

UPDATE: What Quiet Zone?

Why has the bicycle committee been skipping meetings?

You Missed

Sioux Falls is hostile towards bicyclists and peds

TenHaken’s comment about Culture Wars shows his ignorance on how laws are made and his greed

The Color of Sound

Merry Christmas!