So for some reason, the SFPD doesn’t want to share a video that would help them solve a crime;
“The video released this past Friday has been very helpful and eye-opening, shedding light on where Tyler was headed the morning of September 4th. If anyone knows where Tyler went that morning, please reach out and speak up. This season has been absolutely dreadful and confusing for our family. We all want answers. I know the SFPD has more footage from Combined Building Specialties that shows Tyler walking toward the interstate, and I am hoping that footage will also be released to the public. If anyone knows where Tyler went, SPEAK UP. This is incredibly difficult to express because my vulnerability is being mocked and used as an opportunity to create baseless theories. It’s putting my family’s safety at risk and perpetuating a false narrative that only endangers my family even more. Enough is enough.” – Mona Lisa Perez
As we know, police departments across the country and state have been successful posting evidence online to social media and getting the public to help them solve a crime. I remember a story from a small town in Eastern SD (I forget the name) but after posting a crime on their FB page it was solved in a matter of hours. GIVING THE PUBLIC INFORMATION WILL HELP YOUR INVESTIGATION! THIS IS CRIME PREVENTION 101. They don’t get it. While I hate closed government on ALL LEVELS, the PD should always be transparent in their investigations. Their lack of transparency only cost$ taxpayers because of extended investigations that go nowhere. Unfortunately we will probably have to wait for a new mayor and council to get transparency from the PD. The first thing I would do is fire the chief, the information officer (he would be FIRST!) and all the detectives and replace them with national searches that actually know how to investigate crimes and be transparent with the public. I have felt for a long time that the chief has a ‘warm bodies’ attitude towards hiring and the COS’s son is in charge of that. I often advise people if you can solve the crime on your own, you are probably better off.
Why doesn’t SFPD have body cameras? Most other similar size cities do. Cameras are an important tool. Video simplifies evidence gathering and court cases. Enough so that they’re more than justified. It’s OK, you can turn them off when you’re hiding or at the donut shop.
“Go West Young Man!” Yep, this has been done before. In fact, wasn’t it the British who sent their criminals to Australia to settle that island? Now, I’m not suggesting that most homeless are criminals, but the movement of people is nothing new in our history. The Trail of Tears is a prime example of this. Now, our Mayor wants to send the homeless to the land of Jefferson and McGovern, and a massive trailer park, which would make Bubbles jealous and any oil boom town inspired. But as we look at this alleged solution, we must ask ourselves, what is worse? Is it worse to hide it under the rug or to just sweep it outside to the West? Imagine if they tried sweeping it south towards Taupeville? Oh, the roar that would ensue, thus, another example of the ‘Tale of Two Cities,’ I guess. Plus, Taupeville already has to deal with the inevitability of the Veterans by-pass and the new prison, while out West, where they say a man can become a man, there’s great opportunity out there for banquet and tarps. Thus, perhaps, the Homestead Act should be reinstated, or does it still exist, and many are only waiting to exercise that option when Canada becomes the 51st, and then the Yukon and the Northwest offer great promise.
#TrailerParkPossibilities #Banquets&Tarps
( and Woodstock adds: “Say, do you know what’s the difference between a mobile home and a tarp, well, the latter doesn’t have a skirt”…. ( …..”Or, it’s just one big one”…..
))
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxBDUU_DDd8
Probably the police had something to do with the disappearance, reading between the lines. Otherwise why would they not share their information to the public?