If Edison really wants to blame someone regarding lack of progress on health care reform, he can start with President Obama, who has refused to meet with the Republican leadership since April. Or why the Democratic leadership of Sen. Harry Reid and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi rejected every one of the 35 GOP proposals along with 800 amendments. Does anyone believe all these proposals and amendments have no merit?
First off, Steve, last I checked the Republicans are the minority party, the president has no obligation to do anything with the Republicans, and if the past 8 years are not enough proof of what not to do, I don’t know what is. The American people made a choice last November, they wanted Dems to run our country for at least the next two years, not Republicans. What does that mean? It means we should reject any idea Republicans have, especially since most of them are bad, here’s a few examples;
Can Edison explain why there is no tort reform in the current legislation, which could reduce billions of dollars in health care costs each year?
Yes, because when doctors fuck up your body or kill a family member, you shouldn’t be able to sue them for negligence.
Or why consumers are not allowed to purchase health insurance across state lines?
Who cares if I buy it in South Dakota or Timbuckto? Private health insurance is expensive everywhere and it is a broken system.
Or why small businesses are not allowed to pool their resources to offer health insurance?
I have often been a firm believer that businesses shouldn’t be supplying health care to begin with, not only would it save them billions in benefit costs which could translate into more jobs or higher wages, the other drawback is not being able to take it with you when your leave a job.
These are some of the solutions offered by the Republicans, none of which has been embraced by the Democratic leadership,
Solutions? The only thing your ‘solutions’ offer is more profits to the insurance companies. A public option or better yet single-payer is the only real solution. When the Republicans put REAL solutions on the table, then we will listen. Otherwise, please, do the American public a favor and STFU!
Or why consumers are not allowed to purchase health insurance across state lines?
Because health insurors would do the same thing credit card companies did – they’d find a state where the regulations let them basically do whatever they want, move there, and that state’s regulations would be the de facto regulations for everyone.
A better solution would be to regulate health insurers from the federal, rather than state governments so everyone has the same set of rules. Then, you could purchase a policy ‘across state lines’ from any insuror. It would also make things a lot simpler on the insurors’ end, which would lead to lower costs, and ultimately lower premiums (or at least smaller yearly increases).
Can the wingers ever come up with an original thought? Same BS questions from all of them. Lest they missed it insurance companies are like oil companies, they don’t want competition, that would cause the price to go down. Can’t have that.