Poly43

We Built This City On….

No. It was not built on Rock N Roll. But we did build this city on “Fee Harvesting”. Google that sometime. Hours of insightful reading will await you.

Last week I suggested this in the Sioux City thread.

Just sayin…when you stop to think about WHAT built this town into a city larger than Sioux City…well the pieces all start to come together.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/credit/view/

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2009/03/25/pm_sioux_falls_i/

The REAL reason SF surpassed SC in population back in the eighties lies right here in those two links. The PBS link is especially good. Watch it…especially the first installment called “Over a thousand miles away from Wallstreet”… then we can discuss.

firstpremierloanshark[1]

Sioux City???

Orpheum Theater

A picture of the historic Orpheum Theatre stage in Sioux City

Was thinking of your conversation with KSOO talking head Ruth. She said

“Sioux City???? Who’d wanna live there???

Way too often people only look at the outer layer of something and stop right there. Sure…what we see of Sioux City from I29 cuts right thru there industrial area. What would Sioux City think of Sioux Falls if I29 were where Cliff Avenue is? Not much I suspect.

Ruth’s dig at SC needs to be looked at closer. Maybe from a hourly wage point of view. Ruth’s own job maybe.

So what does a fully qualified and trained radio and television announcer make in SF vs SC? The 90th percentile announcer in SF….$20.88 an hour. In SC. $24.58

How about Customer Service reps? You know, in the town that credit card predators built, the 5470 jobs that start at the 10th percentile wage of a whopping $9.35 an hour. In SF the 90th percentile of those 5470 workers is $17.14 an hour. The SC counterpart? $18.53 an hour. HMMMMMM.

How about a cross section of other jobs and what they pay per hour? We’ll use 90th percentile figures as that is when a person is fully qualified in that particular field.

Chef/Head Cook SF $20.41 SC $24.91

Fast Food Cook SF $10.28 SC $11.23

Security Guard SF $16.66 SC $23.80

Accounting Clerks SF $18.23 SC $19.55

Brick, Block, and Stonemasons SF $22.87 SC $26.10

Carpenters SF $19.82 SC $24.04

Journeyman Electricians SF $25.25 SC $30.29

Plumbers SF $26.25 SC $30.89

How about necktie jobs?

Operations Managers SF $65.05 SC $71.76

Loan Officer SF $34.84 SC $44.26

Civil Engineer SF $42.16 SC $59.04

Numbers accurate from DOL May 2008

So…do Sioux Citians have more fun? You betcha. At least from an affordability standpoint.

Short Yellows Mean More Tickets

20100105_traffic-light-yellow_614mzJust Like this story, the city of Sioux Falls finds revenue much more important than safety. It is DOCUMENTED that the city has LOWERED yellow times. The reason? Well. Take just one guess. The following from an AOL link I had a hard time linking to this forum so I just did a copy and paste of part of it.

Recent studies of the effects and usage of red light cameras at intersections in Texas brought the website The Newspaper to the same conclusion that many motorists have: it’s about revenue.

First let’s look at some numbers: according to the NHTSA there were 34,017 fatal crashes in 2008, with 11,179 of them – and more than 800,000 injuries – attributed to speeding. Most of those fatalities occurred somewhere other than the Interstate, where the speed limit was under 55 miles per hour. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, there were 260,000 “vehicle incidents” from people running red lights, resulting in almost 900 deaths.

That’s 11,179 deaths vs. 900 deaths. In 2006, when traffic fatalities were higher, speeding was deemed the number one cause of death for people ages four to 34.

Yet the IIHS reports that as of December, 2009 only 52 communities use speed cameras. The number of communities that use red light cameras: 442. Almost nine times as many cities employ red light cameras for the stated goal of increasing safety even though speeding appears to be far more deadly.

The problematic issue with red light cameras brings up the same word that describes the problem with speed cameras: “trap.” In the case of Texas, short yellow light times have been found to make it more likely someone will enter the intersection after the red begins to glow – and therefore make it easier to issue ticket.

In one case the length of a yellow light in El Paso was shortened by just a four-tenths of a second and citations jumped by 132%. In another case, a yellow light at a 45-mph intersection in Houston that lasted 3.6 seconds rang up 341% more tickets than the yellow lights at other, similar 45-mph intersections.

Opponents of the red light cameras point to the fact that the duration of yellow lights in these scenarios is often less than the minimum durations proposed by national and state traffic engineering bodies. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has a formula for determining how long a yellow light should stay illuminated, but intersections boasting red light cameras rarely follow those informal guidelines.

In 2003, a study by two researchers at the Texas Transportation Institute published a study that resulted in these findings: “(1) an increase of 0.5 to 1.5 s in yellow duration (such that it does not exceed 5.5 s) will decrease the frequency of red-light-running by at least 50 percent; (2) drivers do adapt to the increase in yellow duration; however, this adaptation does not undo the benefit of an increase in yellow duration; and (3) increasing a yellow interval that is shorter than that obtained from a proposed recommended practice published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is likely to yield the greatest return (in terms of a reduced number of red-light violations) relative to the cost of retiming a yellow interval in the field.”

In plainer English: increase the time of a yellow light, reduce the number of accidents. A one-second increase in the yellow light time duration resulted in a 40-percent reduction in crashes and a 53% drop in violations.

Never mind the fact that many red light cameras are not installed at the intersections with the highest accident rates. And never mind the fact that while cameras are said to capture up to 90% of their violations in the first second of a light going red, the large majority of accidents due to people running red lights happens five seconds after a light has turned red.

What makes it easy for to ignore that facts is the huge amounts of money involved. In Coppell, one of those Texas towns studied, one red light camera issued $862,275 in tickets during a 1-year span. That’s a healthy addition to the coffers in a town of just 39,000 people. Other, larger cities are known to reap millions from red light camera revenue.

And when it comes to short yellows, statistics and studies will pale in the face of the most important number of all: millions. Given the chance to address a municipal budget – and safety – the length of yellow lights is almost the same as a game of limbo: how low can you go?

City Labor

bilde[4]

l3wis, I could not help but think of you as I read this article this morning. Did you not have an issue with a bill the city sent you for trimming one of their own trees in your yard?

http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090928/NEWS/909280306&s

From the Argus

“It took 127.5 labor hours by city employees on three separate dates last year to clean up the Snooks’ yard.”

 

That many hours? For ONE yard? AND for $5059.00.