Freedom, Liberty and David Z
The much anticipated vindication video has arrived. I didn’t know David was suing the city for civil rights violations.
The much anticipated vindication video has arrived. I didn’t know David was suing the city for civil rights violations.
UPDATE: David told me this week he did a video interview with a local videographer and after it is edited, produced and posted to YouTube I will share.
I got word yesterday that all charges against David were dropped before the hearing.
Ever since this happened I have had several conversations with David about the incident. Initially, as I understand it there was three charges against David, two were dropped pretty quickly but the 3rd charge didn’t get dropped until this week.
I told David after he gets the all clear to send me a guest post about his side of the story.
One of the reasons I never posted about this when it happened is because I know David, and didn’t think he did it, but felt it must go thru the court system before I comment on it.
I think the media owes David a massive apology jumping to judgement. Domestic disputes occur several times a day in this community, why isn’t the media reporting on that? Oh because David is ‘weird’. Funny how the media will report a candidate for mayor alledgedly involved in a domestic assault situation but won’t say anything about Marshall Selberg ILLEGALLY living out of his district for a year. I guess the David thing is a bigger story.
Once again, our Food Truck media in Sioux Falls can’t see the story in the forrest.
I was NOT at the meeting tonight, so the only copy I have is this screenshot from David presenting the claim to the city at public input (he is the last person to talk at the end of the meeting).
It sounds like a potential civil rights lawsuit. David did say he was ‘considering’ taking action, so he hasn’t filed an actual suit against the city, but notified them that he may.
From his testimony and presentation this is about how the SFPD treats people. Even if David sues and loses the case, at least the noise from the suit will let some sunshine into our police force.
I have heard rumors that since Chief Thum took over he has been trying to clean up the bad officers with some success, but he knows it is a Herculean task. Let’s just say that Thum is probably feeling more like a house cleaner then a police officer these days.
The SFPD has neglected properly training and reprimanding officers for decades and so now there is years of institutional bad habits that will probably take twice as long to remedy.
There is also a rumor circulating that several top officials with the SFPD and SFFD are walking out the door with the mayor in 2026. Some are scheduled retirements some are NOT.
If this is true, it will be a great learning opportunity for the new mayor new councilors in 2026, lets just hope they are all NEW and not USED.
*I corrected the year from 2024 to 2026.
WHO IS RUNNING IN THE MAYORAL RACE?
I’m a little surprised that I have NOT heard an announcement yet. The election is less then a year away and I was at least expecting one major announcement by now. And if you are running for an open seat, you would be wise to be the first to announce, because people will remember you because you will be the media darling for several days.
I wonder if one-term Jensen will run for mayor? I see that Pitty Patt put up a post about how Jensen is running for the legislature and NOT seeking a second term on the council. Nice smoke and mirrors. We all know you can’t run for mayor and city council at the same time. So Pitty, I call Bullsh!t on you!
Guest Post by Mayoral Candidate David Zokaites
Goals
Community Outreach
City Council Meetings
Current Council Invocation
Ideas for Invocation
Public Input
Designing Laws
Controversial Votes
Before the debate starts, moderators Brian Allen and Trevor Mitchell have a hot mic conversation on how they will do the debate. I found this exchange interesting and thought I would document it if it gets edited from video;
UPDATE II: During the KELO TV debate they addressed Paul as Mr. TenHaken, the correct protocol.
UPDATE: They did edit it out of the DakotaNews and Argus FB videos, so luckily I caught it;
Brian Allen, “I’ve done this a time or two, I know where the quicksand is.”
Mitchell asks Allen, “How do you plan on addressing them? First name?”
Allen then asks who I assume is his producer, and there is a quiet conversation and it is decided to call him Mayor TenHaken.
Allen, “So we are giving him the power of the incumbency during the debate? That makes sense, so it will be Mr. Zokaites, Ms. Islam and Mayor TenHaken.”
Actually, they all should have been addressed the same way, as this handy little guidance points out.
Also during the debate Allen made sure he thanked Paul for his response every time, “Thank You Mayor TenHaken.” That did not happen with the other candidates as often.
Trevor and Allen also had a discussion about the candidates in attendance before debate, and Trevor said, “I see Brekke and Pam Cole.” and Allen perks up and says, “Is Sarah Cole here?” Not sure what that meant?
I will give props to David (who I voted for and have been endorsing) I think he gave common sense answers to big issues. I think Islam has a lot of passion when it comes to the vulnerable and she is well studied on the issues and she took Poops to task several times. TenHaken was on the defense most of the night, and seemed frustrated at the beginning and a little agitated. That is because he is NOT cut out for the job and never has been.
I guess Stormland TV is having another debate tomorrow night at 8 PM, hopefully the council meeting will be done by then.
Downtown Rotary hosted a forum with the At-Large A Candidates today;