263820jpg

I guess the Event Center Task Force will be meeting tommorow at the Morningside Community Center on Bahnson between 11 AM – 1 PM. The topic of discussion is the recent consultant findings and recommendations. Should be an interesting meeting. If I am incorrect about the time, I will update this post before then.

I also took a peak at May’s financial report for the city (Item 9 A)

The city was only up $204,087 dollars from last year May in tax receipts. Ouch! Gonna be a little hard to hit that proposed Half-Billion dollar budget with those kind of gains.

My blogging cohort and all knowing Replacements fan, Scotty Hudson has been saying for years that a 15,000 seat Event Center would be too big for our demographic and population in the metro area, and apparently a consultant firm agrees;

A 10,000-seat events center would be optimal and could attract most concerts and compete for some national sporting events on the high school and college levels.

No surprise. Sioux Falls has often had the mentality, if you build it, they will come. Sometimes that is the case, but not always. Besides funding, and location, a 15,000 seat event center is just too big, especially when we have similiar facilities within an hour and two and half hours away.

Several factors threaten to limit the city’s potential to compete for large regional or national conventions, sporting events and concerts, Kaatz said. Too few hotel rooms, the availability and cost of airline service into the city, and the proximity of the centers to an entertainment district all could hinder Sioux Falls’ efforts to lure business.

What? They have a Buffalo Wild Wings just two blocks away? What do you expect, we reopen Happy Chef? Maybe the Ghost and Sy are right. Maybe it should be downtown. I know the perfect place for it, contaminated dirt and all.

In another major point, Kaatz said that dramatically increasing the size of the convention center without building up necessary support facilities, such as hotels, might not bring in corresponding growth. He argued that because the convention center is booked 60 percent of the time, and heading toward the 70 percent mark, it might be close to reaching its potential, given the existing support facilities nearby.

 

“Let’s not put ourselves in a position where we are not as successful in the future as we were in the past,” he said.

sioux_city_pete_and_the_beggars_jpg_595x325_crop_upscale_q85

The only good thing about Sioux City; a good punk rock music scene

That has always been my agrument about Sioux Falls fast growth. Slower educated growth is superior to fast haphazard growth. Who are we competing with? Seriously. We have NO competition in our region. NONE. You have to drive two and half hours before getting in a city larger then us, and frankly, Omaha isn’t that great. Are we afraid of Sioux City?

Don’t make me laugh.

Kaatz’s analysis is based on the Sioux Falls that exists today or one that will grow incrementally, Baloun said. But that’s not necessarily the city the task force envisions the new events and convention centers serving.

 

“John gave us a very conservative look,” Baloun told Kaatz and the task force. “But there are strategies in place to do other things you don’t know yet.”

BAHAHAHAHA! Why are you holding out on us? And why didn’t you use those strategies instead of paying a consultant thousands of dollars for a report you are going to throw in the garbage?

Kind of reminds of the audit of the Pavilion a few years ago. “Thanks for the suggestions where we can improve. But we will ignore them and continue to go down the wrong path.”

acr039

Thanks for the extra tax on your food Mrs. Smith, it helps pay for the next Cher concert in Sux Falls.

There were several parts of this article I could pick apart and bitch about, but it’s a Sunday, and I don’t have the patience or the time, I will, however comment on this part;

The city would need a new funding source – probably through an increase in the local sales tax, which is at 2 percent. That would take legislative approval in Pierre.

Even if my whiny little ass was on street corners, 24/7 before the this tax increase vote telling people this tax increase is ‘stupid’, it would not matter. It is stupid. And common sense will tell people that. I can’t believe that these supposed ‘city leaders’ came up with this option to fund the EC. Voters will shoot it down. A bed and booze tax is the best way to fund this place, not an increase on food and utility taxes to people who will never use this facility.

I do support a new EC, but don’t I don’t think making the people who will never benefit from it, pay for it.

The EC Task Force needs to grow a brain, seriously.

Only our genius city council would set aside funding for an election that may not happen. Unless the legislature approves letting municipalities raise the regressive tax on food and utilities 2 cents this vote will never take place.

A public vote on whether to finance a new events center in Sioux Falls probably will be held during the 2010 general election, two Sioux Falls city councilors say.

 

The council will budget about $3,000 to pay for the expenses associated with printing ballots should the issue go to voters.

“The idea is to get the most citizens to weigh in on it,” Councilor Pat Costello said.

Weigh in on what? It is a complete mystery what the EC task force is doing. Heck, the SF School board doesn’t even know.

ec-cp

There has been chatter about this for awhile, but a (reliable) little birdy told me today it is a STRONG possibility and is being studied.  Not sure if certain people are putting these whispers out there to scare the city into rushing things, or if they are serious but it would mean there would have to be a shitload of private investors involved in the venture. The plans also include it being built on the land adjoining the Cherapa Place.

I support the idea 110%. I have felt all along – if this is such a ‘money making’ venture for the city why couldn’t it be for private investors? I say it is about time the HAVE’s to put their money where their mouth is and prove it to us. And if you make buckets of money from the investment – good for you!

I also betcha it will be built for a Hell-uva-lot less and be more functional. The greatest benefit is not only would taxpayer’s NOT have to foot the bill and operating expenses, it will have an economic impact on our community that benefits all of us in jobs and tax revenue.

I say go for it!

Anybody else heard anything?