Minnehaha County

Good thing the county had an opt-out, otherwise there would be no raises for the part-time commissioners

Am I the only one that catches the Minnehaha County Commissioners in constant contradictions?

Signaling Minnehaha County’s emergence from several years of budget austerity, county commissioners voted themselves a pay raise Wednesday.

The county has turned the corner on a period of “economic dire straits,” according to Commissioner John Pekas.

Okay, so just a few months ago we had to have an opt-out because of the increasing number of prosecutions, but now all of a sudden we have ‘turned a corner.’ Huh? Is Mayor Huether running the county commission also?

I guess I am not the only one who thinks handing out all these TIF’s is a bad idea

I have often wondered how the city has gotten away with giving out tax incentives at the detriment of the county and school district. But have no fear, the city is using prudence;

The districts are crucial for economic development, but city officials are conservative about which projects qualify, said Brent O’Neil, the city’s economic development manager.

I guess I would like to know what Brent considers to be conservative? Luxury lofts and big box retailers (that already planned on coming with or without the TIF incentive).

“We end up picking up more work without any means of financing it for a long time,” said Dick Kelly, Minnehaha County Commission chairman, adding that the city benefits from increased sales tax revenue, and schools have other funding during this waiting period. “Long-term thinking, it’s good, but you still gotta get there and demands come right away.”

Yeah, what does the city care, they are not taking any money out of their coffers to enable the TIF’s. It would be like buying a car with a loan that you don’t have to make a payment on until 20 years down the road, but by then you have sold car and the loan becomes someone else’s problem.

The issue will be up for discussion during the Legislative session in Pierre. The South Dakota Association of County Commissioners approved a resolution — Minnehaha County did not support it — seeking a change that would require all taxing entities to approve TIFs in order to use the anticipated property tax increase, said Ken McFarland, the Minnehaha County Commission’s administrative officer. If the city, for example, was the only entity to approve, then only that portion of property tax increment could be used.

Makes sense. Right? Not to Mikey;

Mayor Mike Huether credits TIFs with changing the city.

“When I first started, we were hoping and working to get out of the economic funk, and one of the tools we realized could help stimulate some activity were these TIFs,” he said. “And, oh my, they are making a difference … it not only cleans up a site but also develops the site and it will turn into what I believe will be a retail and sales tax cash cow for the city.”

And while you are taking money away from the county, subsidizing wealthy developers and putting more in the city coffers to spend on pickleball courts (and not snowgates) how is it benefitting me, the lowly tax payer? I have often said if TIF’s are good enough for private development, they are good enough for home owners. It’s funny how Lloyd claims he and his buddy Donny Dunham couldn’t do these projects without TIF’s yet everyday in this fine city, private homeowners pull up their boot straps and figure out how to restore and fixup old homes in the central DT area;

“There’s no way in God’s green earth we could have done CNA (Surety building) and the (downtown Hilton Garden Inn) hotel, no way we could have done Uptown lofts, no way (Don) Dunham could have done some of the buildings downtown without TIF,” Developer Craig Lloyd said. “It’s been pretty site specific, area specific.”

Yes, those projects could have been done without TIF’s, the difference would be that instead of taking away from property tax revenues developers would have to spend their own money to do it. Gee, isn’t capitalism a bitch?

Beninga said commissioners have had informal discussions about TIFs for a few months, and it’s time to bring it to the public table.

“We don’t get a say,” Beninga said. “That’s an issue. It’s a decision we don’t make, but it affects us. We need to have more input, frankly.”

Beninga is right, why doesn’t the county have a say in the matter?

Lloyd, who has been working with the city since last November to create TIF No. 18 for a Phillips Avenue Loft development, said expanding the use of TIFs for economic development is necessary, because South Dakota has few other tools to attract business. Yes, there’s no income tax, and lower workman’s comp, Lloyd said. But those things don’t help in the short term.

What a load of baloney. We have some of the best public saftey, public schools and parks and rec in the nation. We also have high productivity and low salaries in SD, these things DO attract business. Not sure how building luxury lofts using a tax rebate incentive attracts business, but this is coming from the same guy who promised us before the 2nd penny got raised to a full penny that developers would be putting in 50% to the arterial road fund. How did that prediction work out Craig? Seemed to work out pretty good for you, just not the rest of us, and I don’t look at TIF’s any differently. The developers will reap the short term benefits while the regular property tax payer will be left holding the bag when the county has to have another property tax opt-out.

Maybe someone should read SE Fair Manager Scott Wick the US Constitution

First he stopped people from petitioning their government on the fair grounds (which are owned by the people petitioning the government) now he wants to fine bands for using cuss words (a clear violation of 1st Amendment rights).

Not sure what country Wick is from, but he doesn’t sound like he is from America.

Sure, cuss words and pesky petition gatherers can be annoying, but guess what, they have rights, the US constitution guarantees these rights.

It reminds me of something Lucinda Williams said about one of her songs a few years back in concert, she was going to perform the song on the ‘Today’ show, and they asked her to censor some parts of the song (it is about masturbation, and other stuff). She told them she was going to perform the song ‘as is’ or not at all. This was of course about 60 seconds before air. She performed the song ‘as is’ and she said this, “And guess what? No one died, and no one got hurt.”

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3kABrix9Ko&feature=fvwrel[/youtube]

UPDATED: Let the petition drive games begin

Minnehaha County Auditor’s office fearless leader, “Not sure if they have enough signatures. They won’t let me look in their minivan.”

UPDATED: BTW, my apologies to Litz. He apparently is telling the truth in this matter, according to the Argus.

I will admit, I am surprised the opt-out signature gatherers were able to get 5,400 signatures. I do know there was 35+ volunteers out there getting them. The problem is the short time they had to get them (20 days). As I told one of the volunteers the other day, “This is done on purpose to make it very, very, difficult for citizens to overturn legislation.”

You should always try to get at least 20% over your needed amount for a buffer. But like I said, time constraints are a bitch.

Shortly before a 5 p.m. deadline today, activists say they turned in about 5,400 signatures, more than the 5,334 they need.

Minnehaha County Auditor Bob Litz didn’t count or verify the referral petitions today. That process will begin on Thursday. But his office did a rough, unofficial count and say the opponents might be thousands of signatures short.

C’mon Bob! You determined from a ‘rough count’ they were thousands short? I suggest that if Bob ‘Can’t get enough ballots to the precincts’ Litz deems them invalid, that the group ask for an independent audit agreed upon by both parties. How can you trust a county auditor that 1) collects his paycheck from the very county that is asking for a tax increase and 2) chased the petition gatherers out of the Republican booth at the SE fair? it is pretty damn obvious he has a bias in this matter, and his hands should be kept off of the petitions. I would also suggest the group have a representative sitting right next to the auditor reviewing the signatures. Remember this same office can’t even distribute ballots correctly, blaming it on a mini-van taking the ballots hostage. My confidence in the current auditor’s office is at a all time low, and his current support system, SOS Jason Gant, doesn’t know petition laws from a freaking hole in the ground. I guess he is too busy tracking people who are visiting his website.

Will the audit of these signatures be fair? I guess we will have to wait and see. I’m not holding my breath.

UPDATED: Group is feverishly trying to overturn Minnehaha county property tax opt-out

UPDATED: A group of about 35-40 concerned citizens have been trying to gather enough signatures by Wednesday’s deadline to put the property tax opt-out to a vote of the people. (The auditor’s office told them they had until the end of the day Wednesday to submit the signatures) But they may not have to worry about it. Apparently they are seeking an extension because of a mixup in the publication dates. They will know soon about that.

Rumor has it that the opt-out is misleading because the group says that the county commission is essentially raising property taxes RETROACTIVELY.

Apparently, the new proposed tax increase begins already in January, 2013 when the 2012 taxes will need to be paid. So in essence, by passing this tax increase in July and having it begin already next January, they are retroactively raising the tax rate going all the way back to January 2012. There is also a rumor that this opt-out had more to do with a raise for county workers then increasing costs in prosecutions. While it is true that they DO need the extra money for prosecutions, it will be interesting to see if it comes out about the pay increases.

They also have pointed out that the county commission may not have followed protocol before voting on the opt-out. It is in reference to public announcements before the vote.