Secretary of State

Are militant lesbians in cahoots with SOS Jason Gant?

(image: wiki)

. . . And I heard the meetings are taking place at undisclosed BK locations.

Sometimes you read online comments (On the Argus site) and just shake your head. This one had me busting at the seams;

Lora Hubbel: The man who counts the votes….the man who COUNTS THE VOTES…is endorsing my opponent and Tim Belgalka’s opponent..BOTH of who are ardent pro-abortion and anti-gun legislators and one of them has been endorsed by Militant gay/lesbian groups. I will have lawyers as poll watchers in my precincts….if anyone comes without a picture ID they will be hounded to make sure they are casting a legitimate ballot….Tim you better do the same

While ridiculously funny, I did not find Gant’s endorsement to be very wise. I think this quote from the article said it best;

Begalka said he was mystified by Gant’s move to support his opponent.

“We’ve never had a cross word or disagreement about anything,” he said.

He mused it might be “the establishment in Pierre, who wants to re-elect anybody who’s a yes-man and wants to go along with whatever their agenda is.”

Not a laughing matter and probably true.

The SOS’s office looses again in court

Looks like Gant tried to pull another partisan hat trick, I wonder how much he is costing us in legal fees?

Judge: Democratic candidate can be on ballot

Posted: May 25, 2012 11:12 AM CDT Updated: May 25, 2012 11:12 AM CDT

PIERRE, S.D. (AP) – A judge says a university professor from Mitchell can be placed on the November ballot as a candidate for the South Dakota House.

The state’s chief election officer, Secretary of State Jason Gant, had rejected the nominating petition filed by David Mitchell because Mitchell did not list his political party on one line of the document. But Circuit Judge Mark Barnett says Mitchell substantially complied with requirements because other lines on the document clearly show he is running as a Democrat.

Gant also had argued that Mitchell’s nominating petition was invalid because Mitchell notarized the document himself. But Gant dropped that argument during a court hearing in Pierre on Friday after evidence submitted by Mitchell indicated at least one other legislative candidate might have notarized his own nominating petition.

 

Voters Triumph over SD Secretary of State

Looks like Whopper and Whopper Jr. were handed their asses, again;

Sioux Falls, SD (May 21, 2012) – South Dakota Democratic Party Chairman Ben Nesselhuf released the following statement after a judge reinstated district 8 democratic state senate candidate Charlie Johnson, who was unwarrantedly rejected from the 2012 general election ballot by Secretary of State Jason Gant.

“The will of the voters has triumphed over the whims of the Secretary of State. Judge Barnett agreed that elections should be decided by the voters in district 8 rather than the bureaucrats in Pierre. District 8 voters now have a real choice for state senate this year, and we all look forward to a strong election.”
Judge Barnett of the Sixth Circuit ruled in favor of reinstating state senate candidate Charlie Johnson to the 2012 general election ballot. Charlie Johnson’s petitions were rejected by the Secretary of State’s office as a result of a clerical error made in the Lake County Auditor’s office. The South Dakota Democratic Party sued the Secretary of State to reinstate Johnson.

Where do we go now?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-AYAv0IoWI[/youtube]

Or maybe it should be ‘Where did you go now?’

Well, if you are doing NO wrong, or don’t believe you have a conflict of interest, how do your supposed ‘conflicts’ disappear?

Mr. Ehrisman has since updated his post to show Mr. Powers’s response. Powers has not quite shut down his DakotaCampaignStore.com website, but he has deleted most of the pages on the site. He has also redirected hits to the homepage to drag viewers through three different sham sites before finally dropping them on the infamous “Rick-Rolling” video (go ahead, click: you could use Rick Astley pop-rocking you through your day).

Guess what Pat? The joke you tried to make about ‘obsessive people’ isn’t on me or you, it’s on all the SD voters who trust in your office. Poor bastards.