SF City Council

This is what a compromise looks like for Elmwood Avenue

Here is an overview of where we started on the street vacation and where we ended up.

This is what it looked like before the houses were removed;

This was what Lifescape wanted to do;

This is a proposal by a resident in the neighborhood who used to work as an urban planner. This was proposed last Fall when the first attempt at the street vacation was proposed. Notice the only difference between his proposal and the city’s new compromise is he proposed keeping a two way street instead of one-way.

City’s compromise proposal;

 

Sioux Falls City Council Agenda, March 12, 2019 (Meth epidemic & Pavilion contract)

In the agenda review, we will be covering the explosive growth in Meth and Heroin seizures last year and that the Pavilion apparently negotiating a contract with the city to run (I assume) the Orpheum.

Also, there was a behind the scenes announcement at city hall that Matt Tobias was named as the Assistant Director of the Planning Department. Matt was the head of code enforcement before his promotion.

Council Informational Meeting, 4 PM

The presentation on crime stats show that there has been an enormous growth in Meth and Heroin seizures from 2017-18. We can point a lot of fingers, but let me make it very clear, the number one problem is criminals, gangs and drug traffickers. As you can see, Meth labs are no longer an issue in Sioux Falls that is because it is cheaper to buy the drugs then to make them locally. As I said, it’s hard to point fingers, but our law enforcement needs to get serious, not on addicts but on DEALERS! Our last mayor was in complete denial of the meth problem, so was the former police chief. It’s time the city takes this seriously.

There are also presentations on equalization in Lincoln County (which has been on a steamroller trend to raise property taxes). And another presentation on recycling education.

Council Land Use Committee Meeting, 4:30 PM (Following informational)

Future Land Use and Growth Tier Map Updates

Regular Council Meeting, 7 PM

Item #6, Approval of Contracts, Pavilion legal counsel for agreements;

City Hall says they are exploring a contract with the Pavilion to run the Orpheum, even though SMG has already said their contract ends in July and the Events Center Campus study Book Club said they were looking at it, yet the council is being asked to approve an outside counsel contract negotiator. So which is it Paul? Head City Attorney, Kooistra said Tuesday at the city council meeting that the attorney’s office is short staffed and that they were looking to hire a contract attorney. I wonder why they let their civil rights/ADA attorney go if they were so short staffed? I also wonder if the city should be allowing the Pavilion to run another public facility when they are participating in CENSORSHIP – More to come on that one.

Item #18, 2nd Reading, naming rights for hospitality deck at Levitt. So while the public owns the land and the Levitt, the Levitt will be taking in sponsorship money for a private hospitality deck. While this is probably needed to raise money for the organization, last Tuesday at the council meeting, there was no real good excuse to NOT allow BYOB. Their first argument is that the Levitt is part of Falls Park. Not quite. While there is a sidewalk connecting Levitt to Falls Park, it is NOT Falls Park. Was the Pitts salvage yard part of Falls Park when it sat there? No. They say they cannot allow people to bring their own beer because it is a part of Falls Park which doesn’t allow alcohol. Yet, if they have a special one-day license (which the Levitt will do) they can allow them to sell the alcohol. While they were making the argument, you could tell they knew is was BS. Mayor TenHaken tried to shut down the conversation.

Items #20-30, 1st Readings, International Building Code updates.

Item #32, Resolution. The council finally gets to vote on the Falls Overlook Cafe contract, now that it is pre-packaged for them with a nice bow on top. Read the contract, it’s one heck of a deal for the contractor, the city, not so much. But hey, we will have ice cream at Falls Park!

Item #33, Resolution, demolition approval of the Raven building on 6th and Phillips. Yeah! More parking lots 🙁

Item #34, Resolution to Appoint Citizen Board members. For the 3rd mayor in a row I have been denied to serve on the Visual Arts Commission. This doesn’t surprise me. Radical change and ideas scare the hell out of people. I will commend current board members for arguing my case, who will remain nameless. Thank you.

MORE COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS TO COME.

Who are the Score Keepers? (Guest Post, Bruce Danielson)

Of course they don’t want to acknowledge they keep score.

“As public servants, we don’t keep score. It’s about doing what’s right. We do what is best for the public and the community as a whole to move our great city forward and care for its citizenry,” TenHaken said Thursday after seeing Starr’s Facebook post.

It is always interesting how shallow the 5 and mayor are. There is no ability to see past their winner takes all attitude. This is not a football game. This is government where the people elect representatives to work together to craft solutions good for as many as possible without trampling the rights of the less powerful. Why is it when the public wins, sore heads like the six work so hard to make it seem like the public didn’t win anything.

The classic line from Vince Lombardi “Winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing” just isn’t supposed to apply to government.  

“TenHaken’s deputy chief of staff T.J. Nelson said none of the three councilors who opposed the street vacation were involved in crafting the compromise proposal.”

Those of us who have worked for years to open the doors to Sioux Falls city government find humor in the following statement.

“Kiley said Starr’s role in finding compromise was minimal at best and his response to it isn’t productive for Lifescape or the community.”

Of course they were not involved, the doors of power have been locked to keep the three councilors out. If the doors had been open to any of the three to contribute, it would have validated their concerns. The way this has been handled including not informing the whole council before the media shows this administration does not understand the importance of or care to give respect to the Council.  This process shows the way the simple moronic authoritarian ways of city hall are perpetuated post-Huether.

The compromise was hatched by citizens during the September street vacation public input. The compromise proposal was cultivated by neighbors. The ill-conceived second vacation vote did not address the neighbor’s concerns or the mismatched and ill-fitting proposal being forced on the Council during the last vote. The legal process was followed and the voting showed the vacation was legally rejected by the Council.

“I wish the effort and energy it requires to take credit for things he has little if any invovlement would be placed in a more positive and constructive fashion for citizens, especially those who struggle with disabilities,” he said.

Mr. Kiley in speaking for the losing majority seems to forget his hours of lectures he and a few others on the Council have forced us to listen to as they have crafted their demands for the three to be subservient to the majority’s wishes. The March 5, 2019 Council meeting incident where Mr. Kiley cried out to the mayor about an audience member laughing at his pompous buffoonery just shows how weak he really is when faced with opposition.

Just think how much more could be accomplished if the leader of the administration and his followers on the Council tried to compromise?

Start link:  https://youtu.be/Dopk4WwAW7Q?t=6192

Sioux Falls City Council Digging in their Heels

If you watched last night’s city council meeting or several before that, you will notice a trend of some Sioux Falls city councilors digging in their heels on really bad policy decisions. As a person who has watched this for several years, I’m baffled by it. The public sees it too, and they are equally baffled. What accounts for this? Is there a deep state of local power broker puppeteers pulling the strings? Has the influence of private and/or business money in politics become so second nature, that even our city council and mayor don’t notice it – or just don’t bother to hide it? Example: look at the plurality vote. Everyone knows it was a bad idea to change it to majority, but the majority council voters didn’t blink an eye. Why?

Consider the re-zoning for the Avera nun apartments. This takes taxpaying residential affordable housing off the table for the benefit of non-profit housing. What’s in it for the taxpayers? Why the corresponding destruction of a core neighborhood next to Avera, and those adjacent to Sanford, Lifescape Children’s Hospital & School, and even Billion Buick/GMC? Why the closed door meetings when transparency has been promised? Why the dissent and apparent indifference toward Public Input at official municipal meetings?

Maybe we just chock it up to politics as usual, but given how much these decisions seem related to commercial development, it sure smacks of a bunch of quid pro quo. Are these obstinate councilors really that cheap of a date?