SF City Council

City Link Contracts Clarified

I shot off some questions this morning to city councilors about City Link contracts with some of their NON City employee on-air personalities. The Q & A Below with my thoughts, with answers from Jason Reisdorfer Director of Innovation & Technology with the City of Sioux Falls. I would like to thank Jason for getting back to me in a timely manner.

Q: I noticed the city will be paying Pinny Consulting (Michele Wellman) a FLAT fee of $10,000 a year for her assistance (I’m assuming) with the 25 minute, once a month, city link show ‘City Scene’.

I’m wondering if I can see a break down of her charges and how she came up with this ‘Flat Fee’ and what she all does for that, and how much time she spends per month on her services for the city.

A: This is incorrect, it’s not a FLAT $10,000 per year.   The contract MAXIMUM is $10,000.   Our agreement with Michelle is $50/hour, with a max of $500/month.   She rarely charges us more than $250/episode.  Year-to-date through 12/17, we’ve paid her $2750 for 11 episodes.

The Contract; pinnyPR

MY THOTS: While $50 per/hr is a pretty reasonable rate, I’m not quite sure she spends 5 hours a month on the episodes, when her last appearance on the show lasted a total of about 90 seconds.

Q: I’m also wondering if we have a similar contract with Madeline Shields who hosts the once a month, 25 minute show, Inside Townhall on city link, and what that contract looks like.

A: Madeline’s contract is a flat $200/episode.

MY THOTS: Madeline also does a pre-game with her guests usually over the phone, in an email and before the show. She also prepares questions for the show and moderates it.

Q: I’m also wondering what the contract looked like with Jolene Loetscher who was the last host of ‘City Scene’.

A: Jolene received a flat $500/month, which included pre-production meetings & other production services.

MY THOTS: I also believe Jolene did the full production of the show, because it seemed more polished to me than a normal City Link production.

Q: And since full time Staffers Colleen Moran and Reid Holsen also host shows on City Link, I’m wondering if they get an extra stipend for those duties?

A: Neither Reid, nor Colleen receive additional Stipends.  (Nor do any city employees that I’m aware of).  This would fit under the ‘other duties as assigned’ as part of their job descriptions.

MY THOTS: This final answer proves my point completely, with a very capable staff at City Link, why are we using OUTSIDE, Non-City employees to produce these shows (at an extra cost)? The on-air personality can be anyone, it could even be a voice over on the City Scene show and Council Operations Manager Jim David could easily host the Inside Town Hall show. This is publicly funded media, and needs be done in the most professional and fiscally responsible manner. Use city staff.

 

 

Sioux Falls City Council Agenda, Dec 18, 2018

I often tell people it’s the ‘Little Things’ in the meetings that stick out. This week’s meetings are NO exception. The regular council meeting is chocked full of interesting tid-bits.

Council Informational Meeting, 4 PM

Presentations on November Financials, the 85th & I-29 Exchange (That should be interesting). We also get an update on the licensing agreement with Verizon on 5G cells. Read that piece of work, looks as though executives from Verizon wrote this gem; Verizon-agreement

Regular Council Meeting, 7 PM

Item#6, Approval of Contracts

The city is spending $247K on after school programs;

While I think this programming is needed, should it not be the responsibility of the SF School District? I know the CC has argued about this in the past. While I don’t have a problem with my tax dollars funding this, the money should come from my school funding taxes. Not only that, the SFSD is set up to get grant funding for these programs. Instead of paying administrators 6 figures and having private restaurants do fundraisers for FREE and reduced lunches, maybe the SFSD needs to scrape the money together for these programs.

We are spending $40K to ‘foster a servant leadership attitude’

I have NO clue who this is for, but like I have said already, we should be electing leaders, why on earth would be spending taxdollars on ‘leadership training’.

We are paying a the host of the city link show ‘City Scene’ $10K a year;

The consultant, ‘Pinny’ is Michele Wellman who used to work at the Pavilion. She narrates the once a month, 25 minute show for $833 per episode. Even if she did more than speak, like write the show, produce it and edit video (which I doubt) It still is a lot of coin. We have full-time media services people (I believe 3) that can handle this show themselves. Especially if they have time to do crap like this;

There is NO REASON we need to pay a NON city employee to do this show. As a city councilor pointed out to me, she makes HALF of what a city councilor makes in a year, which do a heckuva a lot more than narrate a show. I think the city council needs to request Wellman come before the council on Tuesday night and explain what she does for $833 a month.

Item #24, transfer of a liquor license to Village on the River. I find the last sentence interesting ‘Pending Final Inspections’ from health and FD. I guess that will be in two years when they open the place. So what will they do with the license until than? I guess sit on it like a golden goose egg.

Item #35, Resolution to approve the SFPD Union Contract. I find it interesting they are moving forward with this without the approval from the FOP. I wonder what kind of testimony we will get on this?

Item #37 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF SIOUX FALLS’ LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES FOR THE 2019 STATE LEGISLATIVE SESSION. (Doc: Legislative-priority)

Besides the fact they keep pushing TIFs with ZERO evidence they produce economic impact, this little gem that got put in without pre-approval from the rest of the council;

My first thought besides WTF? was, what does this have to do with the CC? Isn’t this a State, County or AG issue? As we all know (or maybe we don’t) our new brainiac Attorney General, the Cookie Monster Muppet wants to eliminate presumptive probation. It seems our very partisan Republican Council Chair, Erickson has decided to slip this in at the last minute to help out the new AG. It’s sneaky, slimy, and sloppy all at once. The council would be wise to not get into the Pierre Reindeer games and strike this from their priorities along with TIFs.

Item #38, Appointment of Citizen Board members.

First the good news, Greg Jamison is getting appointed to the BID Tax board. Bravo.

Now the bad news. Mike Begeman, an executive with Sanford, vice president for public affairs, is getting appointed to the Parks Board. While he does live in the NW part of the city instead of the SE side, it is further proof as councilor Stehly has pointed out many times that the Parks Board is an elitist organization of special interests and the wealthy and connected in our community. It’s time to bring back the district ordinance for Parks Board members.

Joint Sioux Falls City Council – Brandon City Council Meeting

Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 6:00 PM

Minerva’s, 301 S. Phillips Ave., Sioux Falls, SD (This is a dinner the city councilors have with each other, each year. Since it is a public meeting, the public can attend).

Did the city change Agenda sequence after pressure from Cameraman Bruce?

When the new SIRE program came online recently, Bruce noticed some major changes;

I’d still like to have an understanding why we have to start a new numbering system, reusing previously assigned numbers? No one with any understanding of normalizing data would do this. Are we to forever have the current vendor holding this mess over the city forever?

The video indexing / numbering issues are serious. I’d still like to have an understanding why the upgrade system had to start reusing previously assigned numbers previously used. From a data management design, makes no sense. No one with any understanding of normalizing data would do this. In time, this reuse will cause data confusion and system crashes.

The agenda started using lettering under numbers, and different sequence numbers (it has mysteriously disappeared), it seems in the most recent meeting they dropped it, and scrubbed it from past meetings.

Who changed the past agendas from letters back to numbers? Who authorized this?

They kept it in the planning meetings.

Why did they do that? The decisions on how the meetings are organized and posted should be a decision made by the council’s operations committee and voted on by the entire city council. It seems those pesky charter rules are getting the way of progress.

E-Bikes Good, but let’s go a step further

A few years ago at a neighborhood meeting with former mayor Bucktooth & Bowlcut, David Z had a fantastic idea. Why not make the bike trail 24/7 instead of closing it at 10 PM. His argument was simple, many people use it as a form of transit. Many people work different hours in our community. With the proper lighting on bicycles, why can’t commuters use it 24/7?

I would like to take it further, and start installing solar lighting. The Parks department already plows the trail in the winter (thank you). So why not make it functional all the time? It should be explored.

I agree the E-Bike ordinance is a good idea, now let’s truly modernize our bike trail.