Sioux Falls

No money for salaries but plenty for fancy-smancy windows

Oh, the Pavilion continues to amaze and bewilder;

The winning bid, submitted by Sunkota Construction, came in at $779,400. The project had a budget of $925,576 with an estimated price tag of $791,000.

Funny, how all of sudden once the media covered the Pavilion and city hall screw-up over the cost the city decides to be fiscally responsible on a project. See what happens when the MSM in Sioux Falls tells the citizens what are beaurcrats are up to? They become more accountable.

I wonder if this will happen here too…

The red light cameras in Minneapolis are coming down. I’ve long said red light cameras are borderline illegal. This gives precident to sue the city for any money lost due to red-light tickets as well as increased insurance premiums. Hopefully, the days when the city can just set one of these things up and watch the money roll in are over.

On a related note, if you intend to park dowtown in the forseeable future, make sure you keep feeding the meter. Studies have shown that parking ticket enforcement increases as other city revenue decreases. The same can be said for the ratio of warnings to citations issued for minor traffic infractions.

Who knew law enforcement couild be so profitable?

Is there a disconnect between Rounds and Munson?

It’s about time Mayor Munson gets a clue about the economy

One has to wonder after watching events this week.

First the week started off, all fine and dandy, with our esteemed Mayor telling us that Sioux Falls will weather the storm, even though people are getting canned left and right. Then towards the end of the week, Rounds came out to tell us the budget had to be trimmed by $50 million and our shortfall could be $85 million next year in revenue.

So what spreadsheet is Munson reading from? Or better yet, what is our city finance director Eugene ‘Montgomery Burns’ Rowenhorst providing him?

It’s no secret that Pierre has a hissy fit everytime Sioux Falls wants to limit revenue sources. They threatened us with a lawsuit when we wanted to limit Video Lottery telephone booth casinos.

Why is that? Because a monster chunk of money comes from Sioux Falls to fund state government, and ironically from Iowa, Minnesota and probably even Nebraska.

So what isn’t Munson telling us? I think Rounds’ estimate of an $85 million dollar shortfall is conservative and fluff at best, I think it’s gonna be a lot more. And since most of that kitty comes from Sioux Falls, wouldn’t that mean Sioux Falls is gonna be short on revenue also in 2009? Well logically one would come to the conclusion that yes, professor Ehrisman, it was the candlestick in the billard room.

So when is Munson gonna drop this bombshell on us? I suggest he does it, ASAP, I also suggest the council goes into emergency session and amends the 2009 budget to clean out all the extras, like arterial roads we don’t need, $750,000 suspension bridges, million dollar historical windows for the Pavilion, fancy-smancy trim on the new library, new parks, and the list goes on an on.

I may have been hard on Northside Davey over the last few years, but this is no time to play politics with the city’s budget, this is serious shit, and needs to be treated as such.

Amend now Dave, or the only legacy you will have is a failed one.

Good thing I wasn’t at the SF City Council Info meeting yesterday

I would have needed this to get out of there.

View the BS slinging here (click on Jan 12 – info meeting).

First it started out about how rezoning issues with Sanford need to be handled differently in the future. Councilors point out how poorly the way notices are posted and mailed out to homeowners. Amazing. If you were opposed to how it was handled why did all of you (besides Staggers) voted for it?! You knew before the vote that this stuff wasn’t handled correctly, you should have voted NO! Saying something after the fact is a wash. If you want to send a message about how the zoning was handled you do it when you vote – not piss and moan about it after the vote at some little known info meeting. Christ-sakes-alive, please shut off your TVs and engage your brains before voting at meetings.

Secondly the Pavilion showed up to tell the community about a new program(?). They will be open from 5 – 8 PM on the first Friday of each month. Hate to break it to you, been there, done that. I suggest as the marketing manager of the Pavilion you dig up past records about your programs. BTW, it was wildly successful, so wondering why you got rid of it in the first place. You should be open every single night from 5-8 PM so people who go to school or work during the day can enjoy your programs. Of course, that would make sense . . .

Thirdly, a info meeting would not be complete without another theatrical performance by Greg ‘Grease Lightning’ Jamison and his sidekicks Vernon and ‘Biceps’ Bob Litz. I could go into a long description about windbreakers and AC/DC shirts, but ya gotta see it for yourself. It is about a new Event Center and imaginary checks. Funny stuff.

I will summarize that they now are comparing us to the Fargo Dome (I guess they gave up on the Qwest Center comparison). Well, for one, Fargo is a massive college town, there isn’t a larger events center for hours and hours away, and they haven’t sold out many events over the past 20 years (Thanks Costello for that tidbit of info). Staggers, of course is the only councilor to remind them raising retail taxes to build this is a very bad idea, and suggests they use private money instead. Then De magically makes up facts, again. ” The last poll I saw has shown overwhelming support for a new event center”- . (Paraphrasing) De does this quite a bit, so I’m challenging you De, if this is true FREAKING PROVE IT! I do agree people may support it, but not thru retail taxes. It will fall flat on it’s face if you plan to build this with a tax increase on groceries, etc. De also mentions that our tax burden is low in Sioux Falls, yup, and wages are to De.