Sioux Falls

Sioux Falls City Council Agenda, August, 27, 2019

Charter Revision Commission, 3:30 PM, MONDAY, August 26

The CRC is going to have a very busy meeting. They will start with timelines needed to put things on the Spring Ballot.

Then they will discuss changing the rules of petition gathering for charter amendments in reference to the city attorney’s opinion to ‘Triple Check the Charter’. As I mentioned, this is just the opinion of the city attorney and they want to make this assumed rule change to the charter. The citizens could vote it down in the Spring, and I recommend they do. Anybody should be able to circulate petitions in the state of South Dakota as long as you are a resident and registered voter. I think it is a violation of the 1st Amendment to limit petitioners.

Then they will discuss the power of the CRC to make a change to our form of government.

They will also review a list of recommendations made so far to the CRC then end the meeting with reviewing the charter when it comes to elections, financial procedures and departments.

It will all be finished with public input and open discussion. This could be a very long meeting.

City Council Informational, 4 PM, TUESDAY, August 27

Presentations on the Citizen Planning Academy for 2019 and the last budget item for the City Attorney’s office. I find it interesting the city’s attorney’s office ONLY has operations and personnel in their budget and doesn’t include any outside legal counsel (they sneakily tack those costs into the individual department budgets or have the council give special appropriations throughout the year).

City Council/Minnehaha County Joint budget meeting, 5 PM, TUESDAY, August 27

Budget presentations on the Museums, Libraries and Metro Communications.

WussCollege spreading BS about ‘Triple Check the Charter’

Besides the fact it is NONE of Pitty’s business what Sioux Falls citizens want to do with their charter, he seems to be reading into things and believing Councilor Neitzert’s continued distortions and propaganda while he is attacking private citizens for trying to make their city government better.

As you can see from the original document HERE, it is notarized by the city clerk. So do you think Phatty Patty will correct this? How about city councilor Neitzert? Maybe I should call his mommy and tell her he has been a very bad, bad, boy.

Don’t Demolish SF Stadium, SELL IT!

In the private sector, if something doesn’t make money or at least breakeven it goes away. I have often argued that if there is truly a NEED for something, it will pay for itself. The Arena, the Indoor Aquatic Center, Canaries Stadium, The Orpheum, The Washington Pavilion and even the Zoo are operationally subsidized each year by the taxpayers. This doesn’t even include the maintenance and upkeep that comes from the CIP and entertainment tax each year. And who is the biggest offender? The Denty. The taxpayers are on the hook for millions each year in a mortgage payment no matter how many concerts come in or sponsorships.

While many people support the demolition of the Stadium, I say we keep the taxpayers out of the whole deal entirely, sell it as is.

If the Canaries want it, let them buy it and fix it up on their own dime. If a private hotel wants to build there, they can pay the cost of demolition.

Why is it that taxpayers always have to foot the bill whether coming or going? Make this simple, risk free and at no cost and sell the property, even at a discounted rate, and let private industry and the free market take care of it.

As for a public/private partnership with a hotel or baseball stadium, we need to heed the warning of what is happening downtown and the bunker ramp. If people want semi-quasi-minor league baseball in town, they can invest in it or just lease space at Harmadon park as I have suggested in the past.

‘Some’ people in town think we need to subsidize all this entertainment in town for ‘quality of life’. I am for subsidizing the city parks and other amenities, but have you ever looked at ticket prices at these places? I passed going to two different shows this past month at the Pavilion because I just couldn’t see myself paying $80 to see a 90 minute show. I made that mistake ONCE at the Denty. Never again.

I guess what I am saying is that while we are subsidizing these facilities for millions each year, what really are we getting back if you have to drop another $100 at the door? And what about all the people who either can’t go to these facilities, don’t care or cannot afford to? Why should they subsidize them? And don’t believe all this economic impact BS. If we were truly getting an economic impact from it, the hospitality jobs in this town would pay a living wage.

I think we can make this really simple, just sell the stadium as is and be done with it already.