Thune
Finally, some conservatives are tired of wading through Ironic Johnny’s Bullshit (H/T – Helga & Chris)
It was only a matter of time;
Pawlenty may not be the next Romney, but John Thune might be. David Brooks was waxing panegyrical in his column on Thune today, and one thing he focused on was Thune’s alleged love of all things small and local:
“He says his prairie background has given him a preference for small companies and local government. When he criticizes the Democrats, it is for mixing big government with big business: the bailouts of Wall Street, the subsidies to the big auto and energy corporations [bold mine-DL]. His populism is not angry. He doesn’t rail against the malefactors of wealth. But it’s there, a celebration of the small and local over the big and urban[bold mine-DL].”
Of course, that celebration was nowhere to be found when it came time to vote on the financial sector bailout last year. Like three-quarters of the Senate and, eventually, a majority of the House, he went for “the big and urban.†Thune voted for the bill, and even had the nerve to pat himself on the back for doing the politically dangerous thing. In fact, TARP was unnecessary, it was a dangerous grant of power to the executive branch, and it represented a gigantic swindle of the public for the benefit of financial institutions. Thune went along with most of the Senate in backing it. It’s true that Thune’s populism isn’t angry–it’s phony and opportunistic. He should do very well for himself in a party that rewards and admires politicians for just this sort of occasional, unreliable pseudo-populism.
Thune now hides behind the claim that he was misled when he cast his vote to grant the executive unaccountable power to use TARP funds however it saw fit. This is what every member of Congress who took the wrong position on a major vote tends to say nowadays when he had to answer for it later: the White House tricked me! Nothing inspires confidence in someone’s leadership abilities like the admission that he was easily fooled into making terrible mistakes. It’s a great campaign slogan: I’m so gullible, I even followed the Bush administration’s lead. I seem to remember that line of argument not working out very well for leading Democrats who voted for the war authorization in 2002.
Of course, the point opponents kept making was that there was no guarantee that the executive would use the money for the stated reason for the TARP. In fact, it has never been used for its original toxic-asset-buying purpose, because the government has never developed and likely never could have developed a mechanism for determing the price of these opaque assets. That doesn’t mean that the stated reason was a good one, and it does not mean that the program would have worked had they attempted to use it for its intended purpose, but the grant of power to the Treasury that Thune supported could have been used in any number of ways, which was why the sheer unaccountability and lack of oversight for the program were reasons enough to oppose it. Now that the public is sick of the bailouts, Thune has discovered that he, too, dislikes collusion between government and financial institutions, and in this he is just like Romney.
This part from Brooks’ article would be funny, if it weren’t so freaking sad;
C’MON! SINISTER DAVID BROOKS CAN’T BE THE ONLY ONE WHO NOTICED JOHN THUNE (R-SD) IS “SUN-CHAPPED†IN A “PRAIRIE†SORT OF WAY: “The first thing everybody knows about him is that he is tall (6 feet 4 inches), tanned (in a prairie, sun-chapped sort of way) and handsome (John McCain jokes that if he had Thune’s face he’d be president right now). If you wanted a Republican with the same general body type and athletic grace as Barack Obama, you’d pick Thune.â€
Ironic Johnny Shocked that people (women) are mad at him for protecting rapists (H/T – Helga)
And yet our local MSM has yet to cover this story . . .
Last month, 30 Republican senators voted against Sen. Al Franken’s (D-MN) amendment that would punish defense contractors “if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court.†His amendment was inspired by Jamie Leigh Jones, who was gang-raped by her co-workerswhile working for Halliburton/KBR in Baghdad in 2005, and then had to fight her employer for justice.
The GOP senators who sided with defense contractors at the expense of women — such as John Thune (SD) — have been facing an intense backlash. David Vitter (LA) refused to give a rape victim a straight answer when she confronted him about his vote, claiming that he is “absolutely supportive of any [rape] case like that being prosecuted criminally to the full extent of the law.â€
Politico reports that Republicans are now scratching their heads at why the public is so incensed about their “no†votes:
Privately, GOP sources acknowledge that they failed to anticipate the political consequences of a “no†vote on the amendment. And several aides said that Republicans are engaged in an internal blame game about why they agreed to a roll-call vote on the measure, rather than a simple voice vote that would have allowed the opposing senators to duck criticism.
As BarbinMD writes, “Seriously? They voted against an amendment that was prompted by the brutal gang-rape of a young woman by her co-workers while she was working for a company under contract for the United States government, after which she was locked in a shipping container without food or water, threatened if she left to seek medical treatment, and was then prevented from bringing criminal charges against her assailants. And they failed to anticipate the political consequences?â€
Thune is also claiming that Franken doesn’t really care about Jones and other rape victims whose employers have blocked them from seeking justice; he and other Democrats just wanted to “create a vote which they could use to attack Republicans.â€
So basically, the only lesson they learned is that next time, they have to hide their votes when they decide to screw over women’s rights. That way, they can support their allies in the contracting business and the public will never find out.
Ironic Johnny is one hot commodity (H/T – Helga)
Hubba, Hubba!
Republicans say the Democratic proposals fail to address the problem of rising medical costs. Sen. John Thune (R., S.D.) said the Democrats’ legislation will cripple the economy by increasing taxes. “It’s going to fall on a lot of average middle-class Americans,” Mr. Thune said.
You obviously are misleading the public, again. First off, where is your concern about the middle-class over the billions wasted in the Iraq & Afghan wars? Or GW’s TARP funding? Or the fact that 50% of bankruptcies are due to medical bills? As for your tax concerns, I don’t know too many ‘middle-class’ Americans making $500,000 a year, that may be in your world John, but not in mine (those will be the individuals taxed to pay for health reform).
‘Regular guy’ Thune is hot commodity in GOP circles
Washington (CNN) — He walks through Washington’s Reagan National Airport, arriving as he does nearly every Monday from a weekend home in South Dakota. He makes his way unnoticed.But John Thune’s anonymity may not last forever.
He is a Republican on the rise: a freshman senator who is already a member of the GOP leadership.
As head of the Senate Republican Policy Committee, Thune runs the weekly strategy session where all Senate Republicans try to find consensus on the best way to challenge President Obama and the Democratic majority.
“It’s probably the most candid assessment that we have in a given week,” Thune said, riding the subway to the Tuesday lunch.
With just 40 Republicans in the Senate now, Thune insists that there is still a diversity of GOP views — but one that he argues must be expanded.
“Because, like, there is tall white men, short white men, old white men and middle-aged white men, in our party”
Thune argues that Republicans can rebuild only by uniting around a promise to control spending — and meaning it.
His big push these days is to return unused bailout money.
“The TARP program now has over $300 billion of unspent funds. Why not end that program and apply it to the federal debt?”
Thune is concerned about the spending? What rock were you living under the past 8 years? I think you are more concerned about a black man as president, just admit it already.
“We want to see more people joining our party,” Thune said.
White, Christian conservatives, that is.