Ellis from the Argue Endorser wrote a column today about the water rate finger pointing;

Mayor Mike Huether got a phone call Tuesday. It was Gary Hanson – former mayor and city commissioner, current Public Utilities commissioner.

Hanson was looking for clarification about comments Huether had made the night before.

“We’re in a catch-up mode in so many ways,” Huether said.

Hanson, who served two terms as mayor, heard about the comments that evening and called Huether the next day to find out whether Huether was accusing him of being a leaderless leader of Sioux Falls. Huether assured him he wasn’t pointing the finger at Hanson. Hanson says he takes Huether at his word.

Really? Then why did you use PART of my quote, “Seems were paying for the sins of the past?”

Oh, and it seems Munson wants to be known as the ‘Roads Mayor’

Munson left office after one of the worst winters in recent memory. With rain in January that subsequently froze, it was an especially bad season for roads. In his last few weeks in office, Munson launched what he called the “most aggressive campaign ever” to fix the roads. When Huether took over, he intensified that effort, to much acclaim from the public.

Munson isn’t happy about being a scapegoat for bad roads. If you look at the final capital budget he proposed, there was $209 million budgeted for roads over five-years. Huether’s first capital budget has $150 million over five years

The key word here is ‘final’ that’s because in his other 7 years he squandered the money on stupid crap, and it seems he was trying to make up for lost time.

Back to those water rate increases: They started under Munson. It was his long-term plan to pay for the bonds that financed the city’s stake in the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System. The rate increases also ensure that water users pay for that service, rather than subsidizing the water utility from general tax dollars.

“When I was there, we were in danger of looking at a subsidy from the general fund, and I don’t think that’s the way it should be,” Munson said.

Huether has accepted that philosophy as well. The city borrowed $70 million for Lewis & Clark, pledging water rates to pay off the debt. You can’t change that now, he said, so the rates must go up.

Poppycock. You can do whatever you want, Munson says in his opinion it shouldn’t be subsidized, but there is no state or federal law preventing a city from doing that. Tax money is tax money. I don’t think you are ‘subsidizing’ anything if you are spending that money on infrastructure. Now streets to nowhere and rock and wood thingies, that is up for debate.

 

 

I had to chuckle while reading the comments of this story this morning. Look who came out of his internets cave;

First off, clarification, Costner. The Reclamation (sewer increases) a few months ago were justified because the extra revenue was going to go towards fixing the sewer pipes. So why all of sudden we need to raise water rates? Secondly, does it really matter what fund fixing pipes comes from? It’s not that the money wasn’t there in the previous administration to fix these pipes, it’s that Munson’s priorities, for the lack of a better word were FUCKED. We had record sales tax revenue. Making it sound like the city was too broke to fix pipes makes me laugh, every time I drive down the $3 million dollar street to nowhere. Who pays rate increases? Taxpayers. Who pays sales taxes? Taxpayers. Who pays property taxes? Taxpayers. Does it really matter where the money comes from to fix pipes? No. We had the money to keep up with these upgrades, but our pussy-whipped council and mayor decided that rock/wood thingies in McKennan Park were more important. So shit hit the fan, literally.

As for your snow gates dig. I thought you were for snow gates? Did you have a change of heart?

Our guests on Tuesday (June 14) will be SF citizen advocates Theresa Stehly and Cheryl Rath. We will try to dedicate most of the show to city politics, such as the Events Center, snowgates, water rates and everything in between. This will be an exciting show because it will be our first female guests and Cheryl has taken detailed notes on the Event Center discussion and has attended several meetings, if not all, concerning the EC. This will not be a love fest for the events center. I did invite Dave Syverson and Steve Hildebrand of Build it Downtown and got no response. I also invited a frequent opposition commenter on my site, and never heard a response. That’s fine I guess, but this would have been their opportunity to make there case un-edited. Prepare to be skewered.

Next month we hope to have on Dr. Allen Unruh to talk about the Sioux Falls Tea Party, I have a feeling other topics will come up to . . .

I left a voice mail (below) with a friend tonight after reading the AL ED Board’s editorial today about increasing sewer and water rates;

“It seems they want to give all kinds of freaking advice to voting citizens in Sioux Falls about local government and how our council should vote, and how we should vote, because they are all knowing in these matters, yet, they can’t seem to figure out how to read a simple agenda calendar to know when our council votes on these matters.”

The city council is voting on raising water rates again on APRIL 18, but this is what the ED board said;

On Monday (April 11), the council will vote on the request for the mid-year increase.

Here’s the deal, I have trouble taking advice from an ED Board that doesn’t even know when the party is supposed to start, or what it’s location is. Once these clowns figure out how to read a calendar, maybe I will take advice from them on how I should vote. But don’t count on it. Remember, one of the members of the ED board, Hawkins, kinda-sorta-kinda compared Huether to Jesus in one of her columns.

I didn’t know whether to laugh, cry, or eat chocolate?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5kHx1itU8c[/youtube]

We don’t seem to be concerned about transparency and conflict of interests in local government. We don’t seem to care about sewer backups, pot-marked streets and water rates being raised every 10 days. We even love to let the city spend millions on task-fucking-force after task-fucking-force on the events center (even though the public has yet to vote on a funding source).

But what do we like to get concerned about? Spring flooding.

Like a women’s menstrual cycle, spring flooding is pretty much gonna happen. Yeah, it may be off a few days, but it always happens. But it doesn’t stop our local government, officials and local media from blowing it way out of proportion;

They believe they have dodged a major bullet.  After weeks of preparing for record flooding, they now believe the flood threat for the city is over, at least for now.

While I should be having a sigh of relief, all I can do is laugh at how freaking ridiculous our city officials look making mountains out of mole hills. It would of took a civil engineer and a meteorologist about 30 minutes to figure out our flood threat was low. But hey, let’s divert attention from the real problems that exist in our city by talking about a woman’s monthly visitor.

Maybe we should hold a press conference about the threat of one-way streets downtown have on public safety. I see Iwegions and old people driving the wrong way all the time on them.