Is the City of Sioux Falls trying to play ‘Catchup’ with ADA sidewalk repairs?

A couple of interesting items on the consent agenda (Item #6, Sub-items 9-10)

Notice almost $1 million in sidewalk repairs. Is it just a pure coincidence?

The city also seems to think we need to spend $380K to design a new clubhouse at Elmwood (Sub-item #6).

Elmwood Golf Course Clubhouse; Agreement for professional services, Stone Group Architects, Inc.

While I understand there is design costs, we are NOT building a Nuclear Reactor, it’s a room where people can eat popcorn and drink beer and a lean two for parking golf carts. If it costs this much to design the facility, can’t wait for the price tag of the actual building? The new city engineering formula is estimate the cost, tack on another 10% and $10 million and call it good.

Is the current mayor looking to bring back the last administration?

Don’t take my word for it, just listen to this audio (by the South Dakota Department of Propaganda).

As rumors have been swirling about whether the former mayor will run for that position again in 2024 it seems the current mayor is busy re-instating his former administrators.

“It’s not just the lead city attorney, by the time he is sworn back in office, he will be fully staffed with with several of his former directors and administrators,” said the current mayor.

I guess I was a little curious how he knew he was even running again and that he would win.

“C’mon Man! Don’t you think it would be a little frustrating for newly elected Mayor Stehly to charge forward with her new administration using his staff? We are just eliminating the guess work for voters. If you re-elect him instead it will be a smooth transition as most if not all of his former staff will already be in place.”

The current mayor also mentioned he will be re-instating some other folks soon, but the list seemed incomplete;

The Former Police Chief, What’s His Name, the guy who hands out free food now.

The former Fire Chief, as soon as his probation is done of course.

That former planning or parking guy, you know the guy who quit city council because he got his butt kicked in the mayoral election and was instrumental in screwing up the Bunker Ramp project before it was the Bunker Ramp project.

Oh and that other guy who helped him screw up the project before it was a project. He used to hang out at the Copper Lounge a lot.

And the communications person who said bloggers were not a part of the media, or were they a part of the media? She should really warn people about mayors in large trucks trying to run over people in swimming pool parking lots.

And really anyone even with a partial knowledge of IT to run IT, or is it the Financial Cultural Street Crimes Wellness department that needs a new director?

He also mentioned he may bring back some councilors;

NO former councilors that like bees and flowers

Maybe that guy who uses steak bones as gavels and doesn’t like hats. He was good at passing bad ordinances.

Maybe the lady that made sure we are getting another packing plant in town, even though we aren’t now.

The current mayor also suggested that they move the city council meetings to Monk’s Ale House since it would be easier for council to get questions from directors answered.

No matter who may be running for the next mayor, it seems they will have a full and capable staff to guide them if elected.

This piece was satire.

What happened to David’s Granite Pedestal?

As I have pointed out several times over the years, I am still wondering where the original pedestal for The Statue of David went in Fawick Park, Downtown Sioux Falls?

In this article I wrote in 2002 for Etc. magazine, I mention the removal of David in 1997 and how the city fought to bring him back because they needed a new pedestal. My question all along is where did the original pedestal go?

No doubt that the structure of the original pedestal probably needed to go away, but it had granite inlays.

Over the years I have pressured current and former city staff where the inlays went. Nobody has said a peep. The closest I got to an admission they were taken was a person said to me, “Let’s just say some VIP in town has quite the treasure.”

I have also heard the granite placards were returned to the Fawick Family.

Either way, it would be nice to know where they went. Probably the same place the images to the Bunker Ramp mural went.

UPDATE: Sioux Falls City Council Consent Agenda includes expenditures for the Zoo and Indian Mound retaining wall

Sometimes you have to peruse the city council’s consent agenda a few times before you catch stuff (Item #6).

Sub-Item #14, Great Plains Zoo Master Plan; Agreement for professional services, CLR Design, $80K (as pointed out to me, non-profit’s subsidized by the city usually pay for their own master plans, at least the Washington Pavilion Management Company has in the past for theirs. What is even more troubling about asking city coffers to pay for this is the new the partnership the Zoo has with the Butterfly house. Is the city gearing up to becoming a bigger owner in the Zoo’s capital? I’m all for long range masterplans, but instead of a study on penguins and butterflies maybe the city council needs to have a masterplan for the long term growth of the city.)

Sub-Item #22, Indian Mound Retaining Wall Rehabilitation – Bank Stabilization – Evaluation and Preliminary Design; Agreement for professional services, Infrastructure Design Group, Inc., $52K

UPDATE: This is a different retaining wall closer to the bike trail by the Country Club.

UPDATE: 6th Street Bunker Bridge becoming more complicated and messy

UPDATE: As it was pointed out to me over the past couple of days, there are some interesting rumors coming out;

• The savings on the mobilization may be just a late fee that was padded into the bid that they no longer have to be concerned about since the project date is being extended. It reminds me of the Event Center siding settlement where the city was given a million dollars of it’s own contingency fund.

• Would have other contractors bid on this project if they would have known about the time extension and could it be broken up into separate bids?

• This may be about utilities. The rumor is Cherapa II cannot open to tenants until more water, sewer and other utilities are hooked up.

Remember when we had to get Phillips to the Falls done right away because developers were ready to start on the adjacent property. The city sat on the land for 11 years for these developers, tax free.

The reason this project is becoming more complicated is because the city is trying to cover up what is really going on.

If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything. – Mark Twain

While most might think saving over a $1 million on the project is a good thing, some may wonder why this is being told to us now (Item #6, Consent Agenda);

• Extend Completion Date – By moving the interim completion date from November 18, 2023, to August 2, 2024, and final completion date to September 6, 2024, SFC Civil is willing to reduce the mobilization on the project by $850,000.
• Cherapa II Contribution – The Cherapa II developer has offered to contribute $250,000 towards constructing right?of?way elements (sidewalk, approach and streetscape) between 6th Street and Cherapa buildings, which reduces City cost.
• Scope Reductions and Substitutions – While still in review, there is approximately $350,000 in additional savings to be realized through scope reductions or substitutions.

Most, if not all of these discounts could have been offered to begin with. There have been many engineers in the city who have expressed with me and other reporters that the mobilization and staging fees were questionable to begin with so I doubt the discount is hurting the general contractors bottom line, but we may never know.

Scope reductions are just a couple of fancy words saying there will be less expensive decorative elements.

While I am glad to see Cherapa will be kicking in some dough, they really will be benefitting the most from this project with extensive off street parking and a proposed quiet zone;

• Four prepayment invoice agreements with Wilson & Company, for approximately $40,000 each, represent the costs for required utility inspection and roadway worker?in?charge services associated with the boring under the BNSF railroad and each individual utility in the shared casing pipe.
• Another prepayment invoice agreement will be coming later, as well as a Construction & Maintenance agreement with BNSF. This agreement will outline the cost and conditions of the signal and rail crossing construction done by BNSF as a part of the project. Details are still being finalized, but it represents an important step in progress towards the future whistle reduction zone downtown.

I think these costs should be shared with BNSF (maybe they are?) when it comes to utilities but as for the quiet zone, not one single penny of city tax dollars should be used. Remember, the Railroads sit on Federal Easement land owned by Federal taxpayers. If any government money is used for the quiet zone it should come from Federal grants, the State DOT and the railroads. And if we are already spending money to evaluate the quiet zones we might as well review it for all DTSF crossings including the two between 12th and Avera on Cliff Avenue. There is a Federal DOT grant program for quiet zones.

I also think the developers of super expensive condos next to the tracks should pony up since this would most likely benefit the residents in this area.

The project just began a few weeks ago and the change orders are already rearing their head. With all the money we are spending on this project, it makes you wonder if the bridge will be gold plated?